Ad Nauseum: Really? Zombies?

Last week, the California Highway Patrol and California Office of Traffic Safety unveiled their newest Public Service Announcement Campaign encouraging drivers not to drive while distracted.    Using zombies as the protagonist, the ads attempt to link unsafe driving practices to the driving dead.

The ad-campaign is based around research showing that talking on a cell phone increases a driver’s distraction by 35%.  Thus, drivers that are talking on the phone are reverting to a zombie-like state endangering all other road users.

The campaign has drawn a fair amount of media attention, websites such as LAist and news channels such as ABC 7 have written and broadcast the PSA’s to their audiences.  In that way, the campaign has already had success, but I worry that the ads themselves miss the mark on several points.

Let’s take “Mobile Zombie” first:

In this ad, the zombie driver is comically engaging in multiple acts of talking, texting and reading his i-pad or other such device. The driver almost never looks at the road and certainly isn’t doing so as generic crash noises sound in the background and we fade to black.

There are several issues in this ad, but as with the other ads, I worry that it misses too many target audiences. I don’t doubt that there are many drivers who do drive in this ridiculously unsafe manner, but most of these drivers consider themselves super drivers who don’t cause crashes.

And those people that use a hands-free car phone setup, or are rocking out on the radio? The people who’s actions cause them to be 35% more distracted than other drivers? They are left off the hook. Yes, shoving a sandwhich in your mouth while drinking a soda while talking on the (non-hands free) phone, as illustrated in Grubbin Zombie, but so is having a container of fries open on the seat next to you and nibbling on them even if you never take your eyes off the road. By focusing on the top 1% of unsafe drivers, the ads let the other 99% off the hook.

One of the most effective P.S.A. campaigns of all time did change driver behavior. In the 1980’s, drunk driving and the crashes, deaths and carnage caused by drunk drivers was actually somewhat tolerated. I had a great-uncle that used to brag that he could “drive better drunk than most drivers can sober.” Mothers Against Drunk Driving and other groups managed to change the conversation through a series of education campaigns and the simple “someone drinks, someone drives, someone dies” campaign. The message was simple, uncluttered, and to the point.

In recent years Departments Of Transportation, including LADOT, have stuck to simple themes with dramatic ads that attempt to change the subject of driver misbehavior by focusing on the victims of distracting driving. LADOT actually won an Emmy for their “Watch the Road” P.S.A. that introduces us to an eight year old girl playing soccer moments before she’s smashed by an innatentive driver. While that ad spreads the blame between the girl and driver, it also makes clear that the adult behind the wheel is, well, is the adult. A second ad shows the driver, who “only took his eye off the road for a second,” trying to emotionally put his life back together.

Ultimately, the end value of a P.S.A. campaign is reliant on a lot of factors, including the biases and sympathies of the person at television stations who makes the decisions which P.S.A.’s to air. But with a limited amount of space to air these advertisements, messages need to be sharp, to the point, and lasting. Do you think these announcements do any of those three things?

Can’t get enough zombies? Don’t worry, there’s more. There are zombies putting on their makeup (and talking on the phone), zombies doing work (and talking on the phone), and zombies partying (and talking on their phone.)

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Why Are Cyclists Included in Distracted Driving Bill?

|
Photo: markofphotography A bill introduced last month by State Senator Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto), who has been a steady advocate for reducing the dangers of distracted driving, would increase first-time and repeat fines for drivers who text while driving or who don’t use hands-free devices, and would extend the prohibition of cell phone use to […]

Proposition 19: Will Legalized Marijuana Lead to Unsafe Streets?

|
One of the more celebrated ballot propositions appearing on next month’s ballot is Proposition 19 a measure that would legalize possession and smoking of Marijuana for people over the age of 21 under state law. Meanwhile, the Federal Government has vowed to continue enforcing a federal prohibition on marijuana regardless of the vote of California […]

Through the Cracks: Governor Signs Speed Limits Bill A.B. 529

|
Last Friday, Governor Jerry Brown signed A.B. 529, legislation authored by San Fernando Valley Assemblyman Mike Gatto that gives local government some discretion in setting speed limits on local roads. “I promised residents that I would do something about those who speed through our neighborhoods,” says Gatto, “I am proud to have delivered that promise today, […]

There Are Opponents to Highway Crash Memorials?

|
Photo: salon.com The California State Assembly recently passed legislation that will allow the family of victims of highway crashes to pay Caltrans to erect signs memorializing the fallen and reminding drivers to drive safely.  However, thanks to opposition from a group of what the Times terms "environmentalists," the legislation is actually watered down so that […]