High Speed Rail Conference: Station Motivation

9 24 10 reed1

The story of high speed rail is one of extremes. The thought of high speed trains whizzing up and down the state is enough to induce a futuristic giddiness – and carry a plurality of voters in 2008’s bond measure. But for some, the train line will be a community crushing blight, a noisy Berlin Wall carving deep into suburban utopia. So far, opposition to the high speed train has mainly been confined to Northern California, but that’s probably because LA’s NIMBYs are too busy suing the Expo Line.

And thus the Urban Land Institute came to its inaugural California High Speed Rail TOD conference with recognition for the perils of HSR development, but nonetheless intensely focused on the glories afforded by a shimmering new high speed rail system for California.

The event gravitated toward large-scale station plans; design teams from the massive stations in San Francisco, San Jose, Anaheim, and San Diego were on-hand (for this post, I’ll stick to the stations in SoCal). Glossy renderings hung proudly on architecture firms’ easels and presenters’ slide shows, bright visions to see us through the difficulties of construction.

The day began with Curt Pringle, California HSR Authority Chair and Mayor of Anaheim. After a few minutes of touting his development accomplishments in Anaheim’s Platinum Triangle, he laid out some of the specifics of California’s HSR plan. He reminded us that despite the tendency to get “bogged down by the news of lawsuits”, people are increasingly seeing HSR “not as a vision but a reality.” Next up were Andreas Heym and Jeff Heller, with presentations on the accomplishments of the French and Chinese HSR systems.But back in California, Kathleen Garcia and Wallace Roberts of San Diego’s proposed Lindbergh Field train station/airport multimodal transit center had plenty to say. It appears that they are at the head of an ambitious project to build a new station and reshape the surrounding neighborhood, and are working to integrate the station into a proposed restructuring of Lindbergh’s check-in center. The center would be relocated to the north side of the airport and be connected with boarding areas, which would remain on the southern side, with an underground tramway. This new center would then be easy to connect to a new high speed train station, along with the Coaster, Amtrak, and Trolley stops. It’s an interesting strategy: if the train doesn’t go to the airport, bring the airport to the train. Maybe we should try that with LAX.

Lindenbergh Station
Lindenbergh Station

In addition to a new train station, designers plan to reshape the street grid, turning Pacific Highway into a “great gateway” into San Diego. There’s even talk about sinking Interstate 5 below grade level, although one of the panelists I spoke with afterward admitted that that’s probably not going to happen. There are also plans to for transit oriented development, or as the panelists prefer to call it, transit integrated development (TID!). One of the speakers lamented that currently “this is a challenged area”. While these new plans would do a lot to counter that, it would seem the biggest challenge is connecting this grandiose new station to the center of San Diego. It appears that this station is intended to supplant a HSR stop at the current Amtrak terminal in the middle of downtown SD, and though there is some loose talk of the train being extended as far as the Mexican border, even that plan wouldn’t include a station in the center of town. This would be a huge nuisance to riders. San Diego should either rethink its endgame for the end of the HSR. Or, as it did with the airport, bring the city to the station by revitalizing the industrial area all the way to the beginning of downtown.

Rendering of Anaheim's Artic Station
Rendering of Anaheim's Artic Station

Though Anaheim’s ARTIC train station didn’t receive a prime spot on the schedule, some of the designers of the project had set up tables near the entrance to the conference hall. I talked to a representative from Arrellano Associates who talked about some of the details of the project. The new station features a soaring design and a massive interior, which is odd considering that its initial train service will only be with Metrolink. Though it will eventually house the high speed line and possibly a maglev to Vegas, none of that looks likely to be done by ARTIC’s projected 2013 opening – hopefully it won’t get too cold a reception. The terminal will also house an extensive bus hub, and even a beautification project that will help connect the station to the nearby Santa Ana river and potentially include bicycle projects, though Arrellano Associates didn’t know exactly what kind of bike projects were being considered. It’s great that Anaheim is getting such a substantial project, though the fact that the whole project exists in the shadow of the 57 freeway and is billed as a place where “freeways… and the rail transit system converge” may put a damper on the enthusiasm.

Throughout the whole convention, I couldn’t help but wonder if there were any prospects for a grand, shiny set of HSR-related developments closer to LA. Katherine Perez, of the ULI’s LA bureau, had some background. Though something definitely needs to be done with Union Station, she felt that any design would have to respect the history of the area. On top of that, Metro is currently negotiating to take full control of the station; currently, they don’t own the entryway and ticketing area. The ULI even tried to get Metro to appear at this convention, but they had made so little progress that there was nothing for them to report. So the ULI is taking matters into their own hands: they’re staging their own design competition for Union Station, with the winning entry hopefully influencing the final design picked by Metro and the HSR authority.

A Rojas-Style Model of the Santa Ana Station area.
A Rojas-Style Model of the Santa Ana Station area.

But you don’t have to be an architect or urban planner to get involved in the design process. RailLA was at the conference, showcasing the results of their community input project for Union Station. They gave participants a square foot foam board and asked them to come up with a James Rojas style model of what they wanted for the area, cataloging the results. They also had a large interactive model for Anaheim that guests were timidly tinkering with.

Though the same doubts remained at the end of the day, the enthusiasm infused from the advancement of planning left everyone a bit more optimistic that they would one day be zipping up and down the state in a gleaming new high speed trains.

  • I was wondering where they were going to put the HSR station in San Diego.

    Frankly, I doubt very highly that HSR would fit into the dimensions of the existing Amtrak station. That’s a shame, because the old station is lovely.

    For what it’s worth, the airport is probably the best possible location, and it’s not that far out from the middle of downtown. The Shinkansen doesn’t go to Osaka’s historic core, it goes to Shin-Osaka (New-Osaka) and the subway connects the two stations.

    As for ARTIC, Anaheim’s aiming to be the central rail hub for all of Orange County. Realistically, it’s probably not a bad idea that its ambitious train station is near the 57 freeway.

  • Anaheim is plenty big enough to be a major train/transit hub. Across Europe, several cities of the same size (around 300,000) have substantial train stations, and few are an hour each way from a couple 1,000,000+ cities.

    Take Strasbourg, http://www.flickr.com/photos/mark_vogel/3020212774/

  • Oh, I have no doubt that Anaheim is big enough. And they have Disneyland to sweeten the pot. All they lack is a light rail line.

    Ironically, Los Angeles with its classic train station (with dozens of connections) tucked neatly into an older part of downtown, will have a much harder time finding a way to squeeze HSR.

  • Clyde Williams

    Unfortunately the Anahiem/LA segment has included the Union Station which affects the other segments (LA-Palmdale and LA-SanBern.

    CHSRA appears to hae finally gotten away from the Super-Platform profile…same as the Space Ship over the Whitehouse in 4th July and would have killed the Union Station…Basic question why did Red Line go underground…because of the many impacts for the surface/elevated in an urban area…

    Now CHSRA has finally accepting going underground north of the Union Station…some BUT they have to come down from an “at-grade” (=elevated to the platform level of the Union Station/GoldLine) station then go under Cornfields State Park, then under LA River/ArroyoSeco, RRs, I-5, and SR110..

    BUT until they put Anaheim Segment under at 12th Str.LA, SanBern Segment under east of Garfield, and Palmdale Segment under north to SR2 or Fletcher AND build the station – 6 tracks – in 1, 2, or 3 levels CHSRA will be oppose and suits filed…whether PPP or CHSRA…

    Oh BTW – SFMuni is building a new underground station in SF Chinatown….UNDERGROUND what do they know??

    Unfortunately all the architects want a monument above ground while screwing over the people that will suffer…


  • Thanks, Drew, for the excellent story, you really caught the “spirit” of the day — get on board, everybody!


On a Rainy Day in Los Angeles, Villaraigosa and Ray LaHood Spread Sunshine for High Speed Rail

In a somewhat rainy day in Southern California, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and United States Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood spread a little sunshine on California’s embattled High Speed Rail project with an upbeat press conference at Los Angeles’ Union Station.   There was no mention of the Federal Transit Administration’s Civil Rights Review […]

Passenger Rail Symposium, Day 1: Hooray for High Speed Rail

(Drew Reed is usually our volunteer Long Beach writer.  However, he volunteered to cover the CTA’s rail transportation symposium in Long Beach that took place Monday and Tuesday.  Here is a review of Monday’s coverage.  Tuesday’s will come tomorrow.  With the exception of the above graphic, all images are by Drew Reed.) Last Monday afternoon, […]

The High Speed Rail Debate Moves to the New York Times

The New York Times yesterday published a series of six opinion pieces debating the merits of the $90 billion High-Speed Rail plan that would connect Los Angeles to San Francisco. Attacks have intensified on the “bullet train” rail project in recent weeks, focused mainly on the projects gigantic $90 billion budget and a recent audit that called funding for […]