Metro Pokes SCAG. Endorses Higher Standards for SB375 Clean Air Emissions.

Downtown L.A. as seen from Westlake.  Photo ##
Downtown L.A. as seen from Westlake. Photo:## King of the Hill/Flickr##

Earlier this month, the Board of the Southern California Association of Governments (S.C.A.G.) rejected the long-term clean air targets for Southern California requested by the Air Resources Board and recommended by their own staff.  While today’s Metro Board Meeting featured good news for cyclists and bad news for bus riders, there was another hot debate over what goals for reducing Greenhouse Gas should be set for Southern California.  You can read the motion here.

A quick bit of history.  After the passage of S.B. 375 in 2008, the landmark legislation that tied greenhouse gas emissions to land use and planning, the state’s Air Resource Board was charged with coming up with a plan to reduce emissions statewide through better planning and reducing vehicle miles traveled.  After a lengthy outreach and research plan, the ARB recommended that the SCAG region, which includes L.A. County, the Inland Empire, Orange County, Riverside County, and San Bernadino County, set goals of an 8% reduction in Greenhouse Gases by 2020 and 13% reduction by 2035 (i.e. the 8/13 standard.)  However, the SCAG Board chose much lower standards, 8% reduction by 2035 and a 6% reduction by 2020 (i.e. the 6/8 standard.)

But those standards weren’t good enough for a Metro Board that is quite a bit more progressive than their colleagues at SCAG.  Metro’s Ad-Hoc sustainability committee recommended that the Metro Board endorse the 8/13 reduction standards and after a brief debate earlier today, the Metro Board passed that recommendation.Speaking for the lower standards was County Supervisor Mike Antonovich who noted that even the lower standards are controversial in many parts of the SCAG region and that it was strange for this body to go against the regional planning agency.  Antonovich introduced a replacement motion supporting the 6/8 standards which was seconded by Diane DuBois.  The motion also drew support from Supervisor John Fasana before being rejected.

What is the difference between the 6/8 standards and the 8/13 standards?  If the state moves forward with the ARB and now Metro proposed standards for Southern California, communities throughout Southern California would have to create zoning laws and transit planning that created the following changes by 2035:

  • 1% reduction in home-based work trips,
  • 174% increase in vanpools
  • 144% increase in carpools
  • 20% increase in walk/bike to school

In other words, support for the kinds of policies that lead to not just clean air, but also livable and vibrant communities.

The whole notion that the 6/8 standards are going to e a difficult goal to reach, one that has been put out by the sprawl lobby, was put to rest by Richard Katz, a Mayoral Appointee to the Metro Board.  Katz noted that because of technology improvements, both in the transportation and other sector, Southern California could see up to a 7% reduction in Greenhouse Gas emissions over the next twenty five years.  In other words, the 6/8 target is really not about protecting the quality of air and reducing carbon emissions as much as it is supporting the already sprawling status quo.

Neither the Metro nor SCAG votes carry the weight of law when setting the standards.  That decision ultimately rests with the ARB.  But Metro’s support for higher emission reduction sends a message that not all of Southern California believes that sprawling development needs to be a way of life in the Southland.


CARB Adopts Aggressive Targets to Meet State Greenhouse Gas Laws

Last Thursday, the California Air Resource Board (CARB) voted unanimously to adopt ambitious targets for greenhouse gas reductions statewide by 2020 and 2035.  Thursday’s vote, hours after the Metro Board of Directors voted to endorse high standards for the Southland, will compel Municipal Planning Organizations (MPO’s) to create development and transportation plans that will encourage […]

What Happens to Transportation Reform if A.B. 32 Does Get Repealed?

What is California’s future? This? Or more cleaner air?. Photo: Kayveeinc/Flickr Last week, the New York Times broke the news that Texas based oil companies were funding the ballot initiative that would "temporarily" place the Greenhouse Gas reforms required by A.B. 32 on hold until California’s unemployment rate reached 5.5%.  When discussing the news with […]

Smart Growth Bill Needs Gov.’s Signature Today

Eastern Dublin, Where Growth Has Taken Place Rapidly Over Recent Years. The Sacramento Bee reports that Sacramento State Senator Darell Steinberg’s efforts to promote cleaner air through better planning are running out of time.  Steinberg’s ground breaking legislation, S.B. 375, directs the state Air Resources Board to set greenhouse gas reduction targets for each of […]

Legislature Passes Groundbreaking Anti-Sprawl Measure

In addition to passing legislation authorizing Metro to begin a "Congestion Pricing" program and allowing Metro to place a half cent sales tax proposition on the fall ballot, the legislature also passed S. 375.  S. 375 is first of its kind legislation that ties land use patterns to emissions and penalizes cities and municipalities that […]