High Speed Rail Project Has Mojo, But Expect a Bumpy Trip

4_27_10_hsr.jpgImage: Metro.net

In perhaps the strongest sign yet of just how politically potent the
statewide high speed rail project has become, a bid by a Republican
Assemblywoman to squelch the project has fallen flat (Assembly Bill
2121) and as a face-saving move the bill has been amended to merely
mandate the California High Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) submit funding
reports
as it goes forward with the project.

As
I noted in a prior commentary, the buzz this project now generates
floors me. For the longest time it received scant attention or respect.

Now
if anything is it suffering from "too many cooks" as jurisdictions and
interest groups clamor to offer their two cents. The most prominent
example of this is the recent request of local transportation agency
heads
Art Leahy (of Metro) and Will Kempton (of OCTA) for CHSRA to
reconsider shared use options for the Los Angeles to Anaheim segment of
the project.

Leslie Pollock at the recent American Planning Association conference
outlined why many high speed rail supporters look askance at share use
being compatible with true high speed service.

But this may be a case where the locals have a good point. In
discussing this situation with local advocate Jerard Wright, he pointed
out to me this is a key corridor worthy of upgrades whether it is
served by full out high speed service and supplemental services or
perhaps a half hourly bullet train from Anaheim that services Los
Angeles and continues on the the Bay Area (and vice versa) along with a
more blended mix of upgraded existing Metrolink and Amtrak services. I
would imagine Leahy and Kempton would agree that is about the level of
service the coastal stub (the high speed line in Orange County will
only go as far south as Irvine) will require for the foreseeable
future. That factor would allow a less impactful plan for the corridor
of the sort local officials have put forward of late.

The good thing is all the stakeholders are now at the table and
talking. Not so long ago that wasn’t really happening. I keep noting
this is a huge project, on a scale comparable to the construction of
the state aqueduct. Our California civic culture is grappling with how
to deal this new and unfamiliar kind of challenge, which admittedly at
times results in zigs and bumps as the project goes forward. That is
the price you pay for being a pioneer.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

The High Speed Rail Debate Moves to the New York Times

|
The New York Times yesterday published a series of six opinion pieces debating the merits of the $90 billion High-Speed Rail plan that would connect Los Angeles to San Francisco. Attacks have intensified on the “bullet train” rail project in recent weeks, focused mainly on the projects gigantic $90 billion budget and a recent audit that called funding for […]