Whose Lifestyle Is It Anyway?

As malls have struggled over the last 20 years or so to stay culturally
relevant — or even profitable — one of the solutions that has gained
ground is the "lifestyle center." These are malls with sidewalks and
sidewalk musicians, European-style fountains, open-air restaurants, and
of course, lots of shopping. They are prefab places masquerading as
real places. Check out this 2006 piece from Slate and you’ll get the idea.

might ask, What’s so terrible about that? After all, these neo-malls
take a lot of their design points straight from the new urbanist
playbook. They recognize the human desire to walk in a safe environment
and interact with other humans. They bank on the idea that people
hunger for the connection of street life.

Well, as Streetsblog Network member Extraordinary Observations discovered on a recent trip to Cleveland’s Orwellian-sounding Legacy Village,
there’s one major hitch: It’s impossible or unsafe to approach most
lifestyle centers without a car. Which is why the blog’s author, Rob
Pitingolo, calls his post, "Not My Lifestyle Kind of Center":

legacy.jpgThe Apple Store at Legacy Village: Drive there so you can walk past it. Photo: parislemon via Flickr

this week I took my bike and rode over to Legacy Village, one of two
"lifestyle centers" in suburban Cleveland.… Every previous visit I
made, I came and went like 99% of the visitors: by driving in a car and
parking in the ginormous "free" surface parking lot. Only after I made
a trip in a way the designers didn’t intend it to be made did I get a
perspective on why these "lifestyle centers" are truly so awful.…

There are two
primary entrances to the center. One on Cedar Road and one on Richmond
Road. There is a perimeter road with 25 mph speed limit signs, but the
streets were designed to handle traffic moving at speeds well exceeding
25. Many drivers ignore the speed limit, and why shouldn’t they? The
designers built the perimeter road so that they would feel safe flying
around every curve.…

[T]he heated sidewalks inside
the center were salted, dried and cleared so that no "pedestrian" would
have any trouble moving from store to store. But the sidewalk right
outside the center on Cedar Road, the street that I carried my bike
along to get to the center, was covered in a foot of week-old snow. No
salt. No plow. Nothing. The street itself was clear and dry. Cars sped
by at 40mph.

Legacy Village is surrounded by an ocean of free
parking spaces, but bike parking spaces are few and far between. I
couldn’t find a rack near my destination on the main "courtyard,"
although I was told after the fact that there is a rack somewhere near
the Apple store. I locked my bike to a fence and on top of about a
half-foot of snow.

In the end, the question in my mind was, what
kind of "lifestyle" does the center attract? It’s ironic that in order
to be a pedestrian inside its borders, it’s essentially a prerequisite
that you must be a motorist to get there. It’s convincing evidence that
if what we want is density and walkability, the solution doesn’t come
prepackaged in some faux village on the outskirts of a city. We had
real towns, villages and cities in this country for most of its
history. And we destroyed them and replaced it with this? That’s sad.
Really sad.

More from around the network: Bike Portland on the importance of better bike infrastructure for families that ride for transportation. The Bus Bench asks a Metro employee a strangely uncomfortable question. And Bike San Diego posts on the fight for road safety for all users.

  • While I’m not particularly fond of these developments on aesthetic grounds, I do think it’s possible to develop them without these specific problems. Americana in Glendale is a decent example as is Paseo Colorado in Pasadena. They both incorporate residential units directly in the “lifestyle center,” are reasonably accessible to transit and are not surrounded by oceans of flat parking lots. They’re also both in relatively high density areas.

    Though The Grove doesn’t have integrated residential units, it does have good transit accessibility, extremely high local residential density (Park La Brea, Pallazo, and West Hollywood generally), a very nice park across the street, and The Original Farmers Market. Personally, I much prefer these kitschy shopping developments to things like L.A. Live which seem mostly cold and isolating.

  • John K

    Still, I find the Grove hard to walk to, since you need to enter the complex from a driveway leading to a parking garage. Also, these developments, from the main thoroughfares that cross their boundaries, appear as monolithic structures, with no entrances to the stores from street side. The “main street” aesthetic is cut off from the community. it would be nice if there were sidewalks and direct access to Pan Pacific Park form The Grove.

  • Shoot, the Grove is a mall surrounded by four meat grinders. The streets around that place are hellacious.

  • Spokker

    “The “main street” aesthetic is cut off from the community.”

    It’s like an exclusive main street for those who own cars. The streets are the moats that keep pedestrians, cyclists and transit riders out.

    So it’s not that dramatic, but it’s telling that the mall parts largely face inward. They should face outward toward the street. It’s like a mini-theme park.

  • As well, the rents and prices at these places are astronomical so that only corporate backed operations can foot the bill. These shopping malls are no more real places than their predecessors not simply because of their disneyland-design, but because the stores and restaurants within them are exactly like every other store and restaurant in every other out-door mall in the country. What we can walk away with is the knowledge that had these projects not been forced–by local governments–and expected–by brainwashed consumers–to provide parking, rents, taxes, and prices at these locations would be significantly lower. It is the concept of designing for affordability that will move us into the future of livable communities.

  • One thing I’ll say about the Grove is that it has a ton of parking but at least they charge for it and it’s mostly in structures so it doesn’t waste as much land as it might have.

    However, these streets are an attempt to have a city without a city’s problems. Homeless person? Kick him out, it’s private property. I’d love to see some housing there instead of the surface parking lot by the Farmer’s Market.

    The crazy thing is some of the buildings are designed to look like they have apartments over them, but they don’t! If we like the look, why not the real thing?

  • Oh yeah, anything that might conceivably add to traffic is anathema, even if it makes it easier to walk, bike, support frequent transit and is better for the environment than more sprawl . . .


Mega Mall Wants Your Comments (Well, maybe not your comments…but it does want someones comments.)

The Woodland Hills/Warner Center Neighborhood Council wants your feedback on the expansion of its mega-mall in the valley. Paradox Unbound has the best description of the Warner Center Deverlopment Project I could find online: The project will link the adjacent Westfield Topanga and Westfield Promenade malls, creating a massive shopping and entertainment district that will […]

LA’s Worst Bike Amenities: Wilshire Crescent

Three weeks ago, I announced a new Streetsblog feature where "every Friday" we’d examine a particularly bike-unfriendly place to visit. The idea was to show how far we have to go to have the Los Angeles that we all want and that’s it’s not all a political problem.  Many places in Los Angeles can actively […]

Maine DOT Leaves Portland Pedestrians Stranded

Plans for a highway widening in Portland, Maine, make little room for pedestrians. (Photo: Rights of Way) This morning on Streetsblog Network, Rights of Way, a blog in Portland, Maine, writes about how the Maine Department of Transportation (MDOT) is trying to push through a highway-widening plan near the city’s scenic Back Cove. Despite a […]

Parking Madness: Vancouver vs. Rutland

Welcome to day two of the 2016 Parking Madness tournament. Yesterday, the assortment of surface parking between the Capitol and Union Station in Washington crushed the parking lots that greet people entering downtown Burlington, Vermont. Today pits “Vancouver’s upscale shopping mall” against the parking crater by the train station in “Vermont’s second city,” Rutland. Vancouver, BC The parking crater around the Oakridge […]