White House Economic Report Touts TIGER, High-Speed Rail, Transit

The White House Council of Economic Advisers’ first annual report under President Obama made headlines
today for its gloomy job-creation outlook, but tucked inside its 462
pages is a tangible reflection of a changed outlook on transportation
policy under the new administration.

NA_BE235_whecon_G_20100211182945.jpgTop White House economic adviser Christina Romer, at right, holds up yesterday’s report. (Photo: WSJ)

In
a section entitled Rescuing the Economy From the Great Recession, for
example, the president’s economic aides name-check a series of
"Responsible Policies to Spur Job Creation."

One of those policies — which neither the House nor the Senate
has chosen to add to their jobs bills this winter — is an expansion of
the stimulus law’s merit-based TIGER grant program, which many
transport reformers view as
a step towards a leveling of the playing field between transit and
roads. Here’s the relevant section of the White House report:

The
experience of the Recovery Act suggests that spending on infrastructure
is an effective way to put people back to work while creating lasting
investments that raise future productivity. For this reason, the
Administration is supporting an additional investment of up to $50
billion in roads, bridges, airports, transit, rail, and water projects.
Funneling some of these funds through programs such as the
Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) program
at the Department of Transportation, which is a competitive grant
program, could offer a way to ensure that the projects with the highest
returns receive top priority.

The economic report
also touts the value of clean transport spending in its section on
energy policies to aid adaptation to climate change.

"Investments
in high-speed rail and public transit will increase energy efficiency
by improving both access and reliability, thus making it possible for
more people to switch to rail or public transit from autos or other
less energy-efficient forms of transportation," the president’s
advisers wrote.

Will this White House support, however buried
it might be, help persuade congressional leaders to add more transit
and rail aid to any jobs bill that comes down the pike?

The prospects appear dim for now in the Senate, where a measure outlined yesterday by Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) focused solely
on keeping the highway trust fund afloat until the end of the year, but
Senate environment committee chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) has suggested that more infrastructure spending could emerge as part of a second small-scale jobs plan.

House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), for her part, indicated in a statement
today that she was not prepared to abandon the transportation
provisions of her chamber’s jobs bill, which included $27.5 billion for highways and $8.4 billion for transit but no TIGER money.

"We will work to ensure that critical pieces of the [House jobs bill] are enacted into law – including investments
in our roads, bridges, and public transit systems," Pelosi said.

The
biggest question mark, then, may be how long it takes the House and
Senate to achieve a workable deal — and whether cash-strapped cities
and local transit agencies can wait that long before imposing more
service cuts and fare hikes.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

House and Senate Agree on $2.5B for High-Speed Rail — And More

|
(Editor’s Note: At the end of Elana’s article, I’m attaching a statement by CALPIRG declaring partial victory) After lengthy negotiations, the House and Senate agreed last night on a massive "omnibus" spending bill [PDF] that includes $2.5 billion for high-speed rail — a compromise between the two chambers — as well as $150 million for […]

Transportation Priorities Jostle for CA’s Cap-and-Trade Revenue

|
A series of hearings in Sacramento have been revisiting California’s Global Warming Solutions Act, Assembly Bill (A.B.) 32, which calls for a statewide reduction in greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) to 1990 levels by 2020. Two recent hearings have opened discussions of Governor Jerry Brown’s proposed spending plan for the revenue received so far from the state’s […]

Report: In Cutting Emissions, CAHSR Expensive Compared to Local Upgrades

|
Streetfilms featured Los Angeles’ Orange Line BRT and bike path in 2009. A new UCLA report says infrastructure projects like the Orange Line are a better way to invest cap-and-trade funds than CA High-Speed Rail. UCLA’s Lewis Center published a report yesterday finding that California’s High-Speed Rail project is a relatively expensive way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) […]