LaHood on Transport: ‘We Don’t Want to Pit One Mode … Against Another’
While Vice President Biden was giving a
candid take on cities’ difficulties taking advantage of the economic
stimulus, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood was giving a recovery
speech of his own in Chicago — where he sent a message of transport
reform to an audience that might not have expected it.
bulk of LaHood’s speech focused on the federal effort to jump-start the
economy, but he closed with a mission statement of sorts for future
policymaking at the U.S. DOT.
LaHood mentioned the importance of setting national targets for the transport system, which has been a central goal of reformers but is absent from the current House version of the long-term infrastructure bill.
also discussed the need for regional planning that better serves the
needs of metro areas instead of top-down transportation decision-making
in state capitals.
One aspect of LaHood’s message in particular, however, was applicable to everyday drivers and cyclists as well as the Washington lobbying machine. "[W]e don’t want to pit one mode of transportation against another," he said.
relevant portion of his remarks is available in full after the jump.
Could it signal the beginning of a more even-handed federal approach to
urban transportation needs?
beyond the [stimulus], I believe it’s time to re-think our federal
spending priorities and focus on transportation investments that more
effectively meet the needs of our communities.
For many years,
federal transportation spending has mainly been driven by rigid
formulas and divided by modes of transportation — with separate
funding for each type of need, from highways to subways to ferries. We
need to turn this around, so that our priorities and the outcomes
people care about — such as building transit and affordable housing
closer together — drive our investments.
In order for this to happen, we have to change the way we
operate. We need to make our national priorities clear — and then
empower state and local jurisdictions and other stakeholders to make
them a reality. And we don’t want to pit one mode of transportation
Instead, we’re asking communities to put
outcomes first — and then determine the type of transportation
infrastructure that works best to meet those outcomes. We’re hoping and
expecting that this will be an effective way to strike a new balance
among all forms of transportation.
We also want to allow
counties and cities to work together to develop regional plans
reflecting both regional and national priorities. Then we’d fund them
directly. The fact is, metro areas hold over 80 percent of the U.S.
population. They’re major centers of economic activity. And they
account for most of the congestion and greenhouse gas emissions.
metro regions to tackle their transportation and energy problems will
move us closer to enjoying cities and suburbs that are cleaner, less
congested, and less polluted than many are today. We think all this can
be accomplished without sacrificing the important investments that also
need to be made in rural towns.
What’s really important
isn’t the size of a project or a jurisdiction. It’s whether we can
succeed in investing in transportation projects that enhance our
quality of life and help us compete economically.