Metro Chief Talks HOT Lanes and Alternative Transportation

Today, Metro hosted it’s third "online chat" with Metro Board Chair Pam O’Connor. Today’s topic was HOT Lanes and the regional transportation funding crisis. For the full chat, click here.

The highlights of the chat were mostly congestion-pricing related. Metro has taken a beating for examining road pricing as a way to reduce congestion, and hopefully today was the beginning a pr campaign designed to explain what it is Metro is hoping to do.
Below are some quotes from the answers about Metro’s HOT Lanes plan.
In response to a question about "punishing car poolers":
Our hope with congestion pricing is to better manage our highway lanes — to make the system work more efficiently and optimally. We think toll lanes will keep the lanes running at 50 miles per hour. And any money collected — although this is far from a huge money-making tool — would be used to increase other transit options along the corridor like van pool subsidies and add more freeway express buses to help everyone move better … especially those who use transit or carpool.
In response to a question about possibly only taking one lane, so that one carpool lane would remain:
So to research, Metro has been working closely with Caltrans on this issue and both agencies feel that congestion pricing can be effective with only one lane – especially as a demonstration project — just to see how the concept works. Certainly we like the flexibility of having two lanes in each direction, as is the case on the Harbor Freeway Transitway. With only one lane, however, the goal will be to get enough people to switch to non peak hours or to vanpools and transit so that the lane moves at a consistent 50 miles per hour.
In response to a claim that congestion pricing is a tax that "puts yet another unfair burden on the motoring public."
The goal is not so much to make big bunches of money — because it won’t (although we will take what is collected and use it for transit improvements along those corridors) — but to squeeze better efficiency out of the lanes and frankly, people will have to give more thought to their driving habits and to the choices they make about travel.
( ed. note: It seems that either Metro or I had a technology snafu, because I haven’t seen the chat updated in the last half an hour…if there are more tidbits on congestion pricing when I have access to the final transcript, I’ll be sure to write about them.)

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Feds Helping Metro Move to HOT Lanes.

|
Traffic Patterns Could Change on the I-10 with the Coming of Congestion Pricing The Federal government has chipped in $213 million to help Metro convert HOV Lanes into a type of toll lane known as a HOT Lane.  HOT Lanes are managed toll lanes with a user fee varies based on the amount of people in […]

Katz Blasts Back at Congestion Pricing Foes in S.G. Valley

|
Metro Board Member Richard Katz took aim at San Gabriel Valley Congresspeople who are fighting Metro’s congestion pricing plans for the I-10, I-110 and I-210.  Steve Hymon, who is suddenly the busiest writer in Los Angeles, wrote about the brewing fight over HOT Lanes at both the Bottleneck Blog and in his weekly Road Sage […]

Daily News Repeats Others’ Arguments Against HOT Lanes

|
Sign Announcing HOT Lanes on SR-167 Outside of Seattle Metro took another shot to the chin this morning when the Daily News joined the congestion pricing pile-on with its unimaginative editorial, "HOV lane conversion plan is a taxpayer rip-off." Honestly? The Daily News should have just reprinted the Tim Rutton’s Op/Ed from the other week […]

Tomorrow’s Big Metro Board Agenda Item: Expanding Congestion Pricing

|
An Exit for Los Angeles off I-210 Headlining tomorrow’s meeting of the Metro Board is a motion by County Supervisor Michael Antonovich requiring staff to examine other highways where Metro could implement congestion pricing.  Antonovich wants the study completed by June’s Metro Board Meeting.  To see the the rest of tomorrow’s agenda, click here. Antonovich’s […]