<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Streetsblog Los Angeles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:23:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Echo Park Community Warns Metro: Hybrid Plan for Route 2 Terminus Untested, Illegal by ubrayj02</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/18/echo-park-community-warns-metro-hybrid-plan-for-route-2-terminus-untested-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-51001</link>
		<dc:creator>ubrayj02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21331#comment-51001</guid>
		<description>A &quot;gap closure&quot;?! Wha?! A gap should be created to keep as much auto traffic as possible from further destroying the quality of life in this neighborhood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A "gap closure"?! Wha?! A gap should be created to keep as much auto traffic as possible from further destroying the quality of life in this neighborhood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Cartoon Thursday:&#8221; Eastside Blog Punks Metro on Gold Line Safety by Randall BusTard</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/19/cartoon-thursday-eastside-blog-punks-metro-on-gold-line-safety/comment-page-1/#comment-50991</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall BusTard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21561#comment-50991</guid>
		<description>One might imagine that the reason Metro is upset at such a wee bit of well-deserved satire is because Metro&#039;s reputation is such that such signs are not impossible. Were metro half as concerned with building and maintaining a world-class metropolitan transit system as it is with its PR campaign, then Los Angeles might have a world-class public transit system. 

Perhaps Fred and Steve might tell us why Tom Horne—Metro&#039;s head of customer service—is the weakest link in metro&#039;s chain, so lousy as to dissuade straphangers and bus riders from complaining. Maybe the Metro duo can tell us why metro is more concerned with fantastic &quot;Go Metro!&quot; video campaigns with Hollywood stars and massive sound stages instead of putting the same safety features on the MGLEE as it does for the Pasadena segment of the Gold Line. Or maybe there&#039;s an article to be done about the massive print campaign that promotes Metro despite the decades-old dearth of timetables on the busses and trains. or why not just tell us why Metro hired a former L.A. Times columnist and a transit blogger to parrot the PR from &quot;the source&quot; instead of fixing the problems that we all know exist but which Metro will not acknowledge? 

It is obvious that Metro is more concerned with its reputation than with making its execs and PR mouthpieces put its boots on the ground (Fred notwithstanding, which is shameful in its own fashion) so as to understand how Metro does NOT work. Art Leahy is commendable in what he has done and is doing, but he is but one man—and a former bus driver who&#039;s father was in transit in Chicago, so he knows the ropes—against a vast sea of bureaucrats. Unfortunately, these clueless execs as well as PR people who brazenly proclaim their refusal to regularly ride the rails about which they write daily, are busy putting lipstick on a pig and calling it a thoroughbred horse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One might imagine that the reason Metro is upset at such a wee bit of well-deserved satire is because Metro's reputation is such that such signs are not impossible. Were metro half as concerned with building and maintaining a world-class metropolitan transit system as it is with its PR campaign, then Los Angeles might have a world-class public transit system. </p>
<p>Perhaps Fred and Steve might tell us why Tom Horne—Metro's head of customer service—is the weakest link in metro's chain, so lousy as to dissuade straphangers and bus riders from complaining. Maybe the Metro duo can tell us why metro is more concerned with fantastic "Go Metro!" video campaigns with Hollywood stars and massive sound stages instead of putting the same safety features on the MGLEE as it does for the Pasadena segment of the Gold Line. Or maybe there's an article to be done about the massive print campaign that promotes Metro despite the decades-old dearth of timetables on the busses and trains. or why not just tell us why Metro hired a former L.A. Times columnist and a transit blogger to parrot the PR from "the source" instead of fixing the problems that we all know exist but which Metro will not acknowledge? </p>
<p>It is obvious that Metro is more concerned with its reputation than with making its execs and PR mouthpieces put its boots on the ground (Fred notwithstanding, which is shameful in its own fashion) so as to understand how Metro does NOT work. Art Leahy is commendable in what he has done and is doing, but he is but one man—and a former bus driver who's father was in transit in Chicago, so he knows the ropes—against a vast sea of bureaucrats. Unfortunately, these clueless execs as well as PR people who brazenly proclaim their refusal to regularly ride the rails about which they write daily, are busy putting lipstick on a pig and calling it a thoroughbred horse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just How Regressive is America’s Federal Housing Policy? by ubrayj02</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/just-how-regressive-is-america%e2%80%99s-federal-housing-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-50981</link>
		<dc:creator>ubrayj02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21791#comment-50981</guid>
		<description>The problem that politicians have is that most of their constituents wouldn&#039;t live where they lived without the intricate web of government handouts that keep people buying homes.

Take away those home ownership handouts and even the Teabaggers will be up in arms whining about how their give-away went away.

Politically, it is tough to fight against the cluelessness of the entitled</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem that politicians have is that most of their constituents wouldn't live where they lived without the intricate web of government handouts that keep people buying homes.</p>
<p>Take away those home ownership handouts and even the Teabaggers will be up in arms whining about how their give-away went away.</p>
<p>Politically, it is tough to fight against the cluelessness of the entitled</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compromise In the Air for Downtown Connector, Expo Phase II by James Fujita</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/compromise-in-the-air-for-downtown-connector-expo-phase-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-50961</link>
		<dc:creator>James Fujita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21741#comment-50961</guid>
		<description>Spokker:   Sorry, if I misunderstood you.  &quot;Massive&quot; isn&#039;t always used in a positive connotation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spokker:   Sorry, if I misunderstood you.  "Massive" isn't always used in a positive connotation...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compromise In the Air for Downtown Connector, Expo Phase II by Spokker</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/compromise-in-the-air-for-downtown-connector-expo-phase-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-50941</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21741#comment-50941</guid>
		<description>I had no problem with the big bridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no problem with the big bridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compromise In the Air for Downtown Connector, Expo Phase II by ubrayj02</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/compromise-in-the-air-for-downtown-connector-expo-phase-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-50931</link>
		<dc:creator>ubrayj02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21741#comment-50931</guid>
		<description>I wish we could have a big bridge too.

If not, I&#039;ll take wider sidewalks, calmer traffic, and a god damned bike lane on Alameda from Little Tokyo to Union Station.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish we could have a big bridge too.</p>
<p>If not, I'll take wider sidewalks, calmer traffic, and a god damned bike lane on Alameda from Little Tokyo to Union Station.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wanted: Your Photos of Kids on Bikes by ubrayj02</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/wanted-your-photos-of-kids-on-bikes/comment-page-1/#comment-50921</link>
		<dc:creator>ubrayj02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21671#comment-50921</guid>
		<description>Done and done.

I dug through all my baby in bakfiets pictures and tried to choose the best.

By the way, I am carry bakfiets at my shop in a variety I never thought possible before!

(1) Flying Pigeon lightweight bakfiets
(2) WorkCycles bakfiets
(3) nihola cargo trikes

Bakfiets in LA! Woo hoo! Now all I need is a customer or two to buy them (other than Damien, of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done and done.</p>
<p>I dug through all my baby in bakfiets pictures and tried to choose the best.</p>
<p>By the way, I am carry bakfiets at my shop in a variety I never thought possible before!</p>
<p>(1) Flying Pigeon lightweight bakfiets<br />
(2) WorkCycles bakfiets<br />
(3) nihola cargo trikes</p>
<p>Bakfiets in LA! Woo hoo! Now all I need is a customer or two to buy them (other than Damien, of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Northeast LA Critical Mass by sonja</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/29/northeast-la-critical-mass-6/comment-page-1/#comment-50871</link>
		<dc:creator>sonja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1554#comment-50871</guid>
		<description>I went to this ride on Friday November 20th and NO ONE WAS THER!!!!! all links fail. there is not contact. why is this on the bike boom calendar???
I&#039;m happy to get the 10 mile round trip ride in anyway, but please! if its on the list, make it happen. LAME!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to this ride on Friday November 20th and NO ONE WAS THER!!!!! all links fail. there is not contact. why is this on the bike boom calendar???<br />
I'm happy to get the 10 mile round trip ride in anyway, but please! if its on the list, make it happen. LAME!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Tweed, Moxie &amp; Mustache Ride by Joe Linton</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/10/the-tweed-moxie-mustache-ride/comment-page-1/#comment-50861</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Linton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=19711#comment-50861</guid>
		<description>The time is incorrect - it&#039;s 12:30pm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The time is incorrect - it's 12:30pm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Study Quantifies High Personal Costs of Building CA Cities for Cars by Spokker</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/21701/comment-page-1/#comment-50851</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21701#comment-50851</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s say you worked in Downtown LA. You&#039;re telling me that some people wouldn&#039;t find it attractive to live near the Gold Line and commute into Downtown every day once the regional connector is open? Sounds more attractive to me than living in Pomona and tackling the 10 everyday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's say you worked in Downtown LA. You're telling me that some people wouldn't find it attractive to live near the Gold Line and commute into Downtown every day once the regional connector is open? Sounds more attractive to me than living in Pomona and tackling the 10 everyday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Study Quantifies High Personal Costs of Building CA Cities for Cars by Spokker</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/21701/comment-page-1/#comment-50841</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21701#comment-50841</guid>
		<description>New York City is just one extreme and no one says you have to live in a place like that. Hell, even streetcar suburbs weren&#039;t that bad as far as suburban development patterns go. Some of them were actually relatively dense. I still think there are ways to live close to transit and closer to work without having to deal with the bums downtown, John. 

Where do you choose to live anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York City is just one extreme and no one says you have to live in a place like that. Hell, even streetcar suburbs weren't that bad as far as suburban development patterns go. Some of them were actually relatively dense. I still think there are ways to live close to transit and closer to work without having to deal with the bums downtown, John. </p>
<p>Where do you choose to live anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just How Regressive is America’s Federal Housing Policy? by cfh</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/just-how-regressive-is-america%e2%80%99s-federal-housing-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-50831</link>
		<dc:creator>cfh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21791#comment-50831</guid>
		<description>&quot;That spending on homeowners included $80 billion for the tax deduction for  mortgage interest, $16 billion for the state and local property-tax deduction and $16 billion for the capital-gains exclusion.&quot;

I don&#039;t agree that these items are subsidies for home ownership vs. renters.

Landlords can deduct mortgage interest and property taxes as business expenses, and also benefit from capital gains treatment of property sale proceeds.  All these provisions are factored in to rental rates.

On the contrary, if this kind of favored tax treatment were not available individual home owners, they would face substantial penalties vs. rental owners.

These provisions simply even thing up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"That spending on homeowners included $80 billion for the tax deduction for  mortgage interest, $16 billion for the state and local property-tax deduction and $16 billion for the capital-gains exclusion."</p>
<p>I don't agree that these items are subsidies for home ownership vs. renters.</p>
<p>Landlords can deduct mortgage interest and property taxes as business expenses, and also benefit from capital gains treatment of property sale proceeds.  All these provisions are factored in to rental rates.</p>
<p>On the contrary, if this kind of favored tax treatment were not available individual home owners, they would face substantial penalties vs. rental owners.</p>
<p>These provisions simply even thing up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Study Quantifies High Personal Costs of Building CA Cities for Cars by John Boucher</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/21701/comment-page-1/#comment-50821</link>
		<dc:creator>John Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21701#comment-50821</guid>
		<description>DJB - I swear, this Metro fetish is just bizarre. If little electric trains and high density housing are the savior of the world and the solution to Global Warming, then how come NYC isn&#039;t the Garden of Eden? 

Been there, seen it, don&#039;t want to do it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DJB - I swear, this Metro fetish is just bizarre. If little electric trains and high density housing are the savior of the world and the solution to Global Warming, then how come NYC isn't the Garden of Eden? </p>
<p>Been there, seen it, don't want to do it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compromise In the Air for Downtown Connector, Expo Phase II by James Fujita</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/compromise-in-the-air-for-downtown-connector-expo-phase-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-50811</link>
		<dc:creator>James Fujita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21741#comment-50811</guid>
		<description>I tell you what,  I actually wish they would build the pedestrian bridge.   

It wasn&#039;t (going to have been) &quot;massive&quot; and it wasn&#039;t ugly. It was colorful.  It would give people an easy way over Alameda.  It would fit right in with the Nikkei Center.  It would give Little Tokyo a new landmark. 

It would have been public art, but with a public purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tell you what,  I actually wish they would build the pedestrian bridge.   </p>
<p>It wasn't (going to have been) "massive" and it wasn't ugly. It was colorful.  It would give people an easy way over Alameda.  It would fit right in with the Nikkei Center.  It would give Little Tokyo a new landmark. </p>
<p>It would have been public art, but with a public purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Study Quantifies High Personal Costs of Building CA Cities for Cars by DJB</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/21701/comment-page-1/#comment-50791</link>
		<dc:creator>DJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21701#comment-50791</guid>
		<description>John, you just proved my point beautifully :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, you just proved my point beautifully :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Study Quantifies High Personal Costs of Building CA Cities for Cars by Spokker</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/21701/comment-page-1/#comment-50781</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21701#comment-50781</guid>
		<description>&quot;It&#039;s what millions left behind when they fled the cities for the suburbs.&quot;

How well has that been working out? Last year they were showing a special on PBS about homeowners in Temecula and Murrieta going apeshit over gas prices and home foreclosures. One dude, a real man&#039;s man, owned a truck nearly his whole life and after 2008 the fucker was driving a Prius with three other people.

People scream, &quot;But the free market! The free market! People will live where they want!&quot; all day but you have to determine whether the free market actually was at work all these years. You know, if planning favored the suburbs, if government funding favored the suburbs, if policies favored single family homes, how free market is that? If I wanted to live in the city, but I saw that they were only investing in the suburbs and not urban areas, I&#039;m going to choose the suburbs! The decision was practically made for me!

If you had a bunch of blacks and Hispanics wanting to move to the suburbs but local governments artificially inflated the price of housing by enacting strict zoning laws and outright banning the construction of apartment units in some cases, how free market is that? If a company wants to build an apartment, why prevent them from doing so? Where&#039;s the laissez faire attitude then? 

Some people advocate pro-choice attitudes about where people can live. I&#039;d like to see it, believe me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"It's what millions left behind when they fled the cities for the suburbs."</p>
<p>How well has that been working out? Last year they were showing a special on PBS about homeowners in Temecula and Murrieta going apeshit over gas prices and home foreclosures. One dude, a real man's man, owned a truck nearly his whole life and after 2008 the fucker was driving a Prius with three other people.</p>
<p>People scream, "But the free market! The free market! People will live where they want!" all day but you have to determine whether the free market actually was at work all these years. You know, if planning favored the suburbs, if government funding favored the suburbs, if policies favored single family homes, how free market is that? If I wanted to live in the city, but I saw that they were only investing in the suburbs and not urban areas, I'm going to choose the suburbs! The decision was practically made for me!</p>
<p>If you had a bunch of blacks and Hispanics wanting to move to the suburbs but local governments artificially inflated the price of housing by enacting strict zoning laws and outright banning the construction of apartment units in some cases, how free market is that? If a company wants to build an apartment, why prevent them from doing so? Where's the laissez faire attitude then? </p>
<p>Some people advocate pro-choice attitudes about where people can live. I'd like to see it, believe me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compromise In the Air for Downtown Connector, Expo Phase II by Spokker</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/compromise-in-the-air-for-downtown-connector-expo-phase-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-50771</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21741#comment-50771</guid>
		<description>I will miss that massive pedestrian bridge!

James Fujita, another railroad crossing in Tokyo (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FL177gDK95E&amp;feature=fvw). Three trains cross before people are able to go, haha. Only a minute delay though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will miss that massive pedestrian bridge!</p>
<p>James Fujita, another railroad crossing in Tokyo (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FL177gDK95E&amp;feature=fvw)" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FL177gDK95E&amp;feature=fvw)</a>. Three trains cross before people are able to go, haha. Only a minute delay though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compromise In the Air for Downtown Connector, Expo Phase II by James Fujita</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/compromise-in-the-air-for-downtown-connector-expo-phase-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-50761</link>
		<dc:creator>James Fujita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21741#comment-50761</guid>
		<description>Actually, there are at-grade crossings in &quot;Big Tokyo.&quot;   For example, here: 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/22038157@N05/sets/72157618807616940/

=

Putting that aside, I am glad that the MTA and the Little Tokyo community were able to discuss things and come up with something that should work well.  

Honestly, I didn&#039;t see the at-grade crossing as that big of a deal, but it does look like they might be able to have the trains go underground without seriously affecting the Nikkei Center, so that&#039;s good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there are at-grade crossings in "Big Tokyo."   For example, here: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/22038157@N05/sets/72157618807616940/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/22038157@N05/sets/72157618807616940/</a></p>
<p>=</p>
<p>Putting that aside, I am glad that the MTA and the Little Tokyo community were able to discuss things and come up with something that should work well.  </p>
<p>Honestly, I didn't see the at-grade crossing as that big of a deal, but it does look like they might be able to have the trains go underground without seriously affecting the Nikkei Center, so that's good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Study Quantifies High Personal Costs of Building CA Cities for Cars by John Boucher</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/21701/comment-page-1/#comment-50751</link>
		<dc:creator>John Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21701#comment-50751</guid>
		<description>This revelation is absurd. If people wanted to live in small stacked boxes and spend their time being trundled around in dismal public transportation, they would. I grew up in New York and believe me, your wonderful future is my not so golden past. It&#039;s what millions left behind when they fled the cities for the suburbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This revelation is absurd. If people wanted to live in small stacked boxes and spend their time being trundled around in dismal public transportation, they would. I grew up in New York and believe me, your wonderful future is my not so golden past. It's what millions left behind when they fled the cities for the suburbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compromise In the Air for Downtown Connector, Expo Phase II by Dave S</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/20/compromise-in-the-air-for-downtown-connector-expo-phase-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-50741</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21741#comment-50741</guid>
		<description>just curious, any one know if there are at-grade train crossings in Big Tokyo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just curious, any one know if there are at-grade train crossings in Big Tokyo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
