(Note: An earlier version of this story mis-identified the Council Member who introduced the motion as Mitch O’Farrell. It was introduced by Mitch Englander. Streetsblog deeply regrets this error.)
Sometimes, a crash is so terrible that a permanent memorial is created. Other times, family and friends will erect a temporary memorial with flowers, pictures and religious symbols. When a bicyclist is slain in a crash, advocates such as Danny Gamboa, Aktive, the Eastside Riders, and Los Ryderz, the city’s bicycle co-ops or any number of people or groups may chain up a haunting white “ghost bike” at the crash site.
How a city should respond to roadside memorials for pedestrians, car passengers and cyclists killed in crashes has been a difficult question. How long is too long? At what point does a memorial become a nuisance? When should a city step in and clean it up?
While my personal answer to such a question is “never,” unless it poses a safety hazard of some sort, the lack of firm rules often leads to police, or sanitation officials, or just a local resident or business taking down a memorial without notice. This leaves the family of the victims feeling angry and violated again.
Sometimes a memorial goes back up. Sometimes it doesn’t.
Councilmembers Mitch Englander and Joe Buscaino have written a motion calling on the city to create rules regarding the maintenance and removal of memorials. Current law orders the Bureau of Sanitation to remove “all items blocking the public right-of-way.” In New York City, a 2010 law allowing the removal of “derelict” bicycles was amended to all “ghost bikes” to stay up, so there is precedent for major cities to enact memorial friendly legislation.
A common time frame for removal is “90 days” in other cities. Tempe, Arizona has such an ordinance, but the memorials often last much longer. But when San Diego removed the ghost bike dedicated to a popular activist nearly half-a-year after the memorial was created, the community reacted with outrage. Read more…