Metro Memo Quietly Responds to Board and Public Fare Increase Concerns

Dana Gabbard testifying before the Metro Board fare restructuring hearing in March 2014. Photo: Metro's The Source
Dana Gabbard testifying before the Metro Board fare restructuring hearing in March 2014. Photo: Steve Hymon via Metro’s The Source

On March 29th, Metro held a public hearing on its proposal to restructure fares. At that meeting, I presented the position of Southern California Transit Advocates.

Among other stakeholders at the March 29th hearing was the Sierra Club Angeles Chapter Transportation Committee, represented by its co-chair Darrell Clarke. He pointedly asked why Metro would raise fares while continuing to have mostly free parking at its rail stations and park and ride lots, a question that this blog has also raised.

Toward the conclusion of the hearing, several Metro board members posed questions of their own. Metro CEO Art Leahy responded, and promised to have agency staff research and provide written responses in “a week to 10 days”  (Meeting Audio File at 4:15:50).

I recently submitted a request to Metro’s Records Management Department to obtain a copy of the response which I thought likely had been distributed directly to the board members as a “board box” communication. I soon discovered it was only this past Friday, May 9th, that the memo titled Response to Inquiries From March 29 2014 Public Hearing (Fare Restructuring) was belatedly ready for distribution. 

Metro’s  response memo addresses not only the queries of its board members, but also issues and questions raised repeatedly by the public in their comments.

Many members of the Metro board have raised various concerns regarding agency revenue. Among these are:

From these concerns, it’s clear to me that many on the Metro Board hope that some source of additional revenue can be found to allow at least a partial reduction in the size of the fare increase. I think it is possible, but it looks like it will be a complicated, and likely contentious, process to navigate.

All in all, I am sure the Board meeting on Thursday, May 22nd, at which the fare changes will be discussed will be a very long one.

  • Joe B

    The “Response to Inquiries” claims that parking lot revenue will be $500K and will eventually increase to $1M. But it does not address why this number falls far short of the $3.5M estimated by Joe Linton on this blog.
    Clarke’s question wasn’t, “How much money do you make from parking?”. His question was, “Why are you raising fares while continuing to raise far less money than you could from parking?”.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Thoughts on Metro’s Fare Restructuring

|
(I want to be explicit this is solely my own opinion, and in no way endorsed by either Streetsblog or Southern California Transit Advocates – DG But I can’t help notice that So.CA.TA. has a special meeting just to discuss the changes this Saturday. – DN) Metro staff recently released two options for fare restructuring […]

Opposition and Confrontation at Metro Fare Increase Hearing

|
On Saturday, Metro held a public hearing on proposed changes to its fare policy. Metro is proposing to raise its $1.50 base transit fare to $1.75 starting September 2014. From there, it would be raised again to $2.00 in 2017, and to $2.25 in 2020. This would include a 90-minute free transfer, but only when the […]

The History Thats Led Us to This Weekend’s Special Metro Board Meeting

|
Photo: biofriendly/Flickr (Everyone knows that Dana is one of the Board members for the Southern California Transit Advocates, right?  Good. – DN) May 24, 2007 the Metro Board held a public hearing to consider what the agency termed euphemistically "fare restructuring". Tumultuous is word that best captures what the six hours of public hearing held in the Metro […]

Metro Considers Raising "Senior Discount" Age to 65

|
At yesterday’s meeting of Metro’s Finance and Budget Subcommittee staff raised the specter of changing the age needed to receive the "Senior Discount" from 62 to 65. All residents currently receiving the discount would be grandfathered in. In response to a question from the audience, Board Member John Fasana clarified that such a change would […]

Are Free and Low Cost Transfers the Key to Fixing Metro’s Operations Mess?

|
Photo:CJaneBuy/Flickr Without some shocking turn of events, 48% of Metro passengers (seniors and students are exempted…this time) will see a fare increase this July.  For whatever reason, last Saturday’s "Special Board Meeting" held at Metro’s headquarters was sparely attended.  Perhaps because the hikes were viewed as inevitable, perhaps because the hearing was on a Saturday, […]

State Avoids Blame As Metro Prepares Service Cuts

|
The public process is over, and now the cuts can begin. Tonight marks the first meeting of Metro’s Regional Service Sector Council where local boards are expected to endorse the staff recommended service cuts. State Senators, advocacy groups and Metro’s riders have all panned the service cuts, calling them everything from "inconvenient" to "racist." However, […]