Introducing, the “Measure J Page”

For a much larger version of the Measure J map, in a high resolution pdf, ##http://www.metro.net/images/measurej/project_map.pdf##click here.##

As we approach election day, there’s going to be a lot of discussion of Measure J. Measure J is the proposed extension of the 2008 Measure R transit tax that is set to expire in 2039. Measure J would extend, not increase, the tax until 2069 allowing Metro to bond against future revenue to build the projects promised by Measure R in a shorter timeline.

To best inform our readers, we’re launching a new page on Streetsblog, the Measure J Page. The purpose of the page isn’t to endorse or oppose Measure J, but to provide a non-biased informational page with outgoing links to news and views on the ballot measure.

The Streetsblog Editorial Board has not discussed taking a position on Measure J, so it’s unlikely we’ll have an official position before November 6th. As a result, you won’t see us pushing for or against the ballot measure. We will try to inform voters, politicians, opinion makers and even other journalists. A major part of that effort will be continuing to update and promote this page.

If you have any links or other information you’d like us to add, please let me know in the comments section or by emailing damien at streetsblog dot org. Every time we update the page, we’ll make announcements on social media and in the next day’s Today’s Headlines.

8 thoughts on Introducing, the “Measure J Page”

  1.  The Valley gets nothing? I guess the Sepulveda Pass corridor which would connect to a Van Nuys Corridor and the Orange Line that will be accelerated is a meaningless project to the Valley

  2. There is no way I am voting to give Metro a blank check for another 30 years to 2069.
    They have already spent money on their own special interests with much of the money we gave them in 2008.
    In other words, Metro lied to us.
    Instead of the promises they made the last time, they gave us little progress.
    Metro is a self interest outfit that only cares about themselves.
    They do not care about your community or you.
    Their own history proves that fact.
    Metro claims that more money will ease traffic and bring swift progress to transportation.
    If that is true, then why was that not done already?
    The only ease of traffic will be their own road to the bank if you vote yes.
    Wake up and look at Metro for what it is.
    A corrupt money making machine that feeds off of your believing in them.
    VOTE NO ON MEASURE J.

    George Vreeland Hill

  3. I get that there are legitimate grievances against Metro, but calling Measure J a ‘blank check’ is nonsensical. Everything’s spelled out in the expenditure plan, and there are restrictions on transferring funds between different projects. I’m curious to know what examples you have to offer of Metro’s ‘special interests’ being funded at the expense of other priorities, because I’m not aware of any.

    If giving Metro money to deliver clearly specified highway and rail projects, subject to independent monitoring and auditing, is a ‘blank check’, then so is any other allocation of money, for any purpose, to any government agency in the history of civilization.

  4. No way mta. Keep packing minorities in your buses like sardines. Audit small businesses that are not paying taxes. More money for mta encourages an out of control pension system for over paid bus drivers. Concentration of buses in downtown LA means that the tax should be born there by business in dtla. Businesses in south central, the east valley, north east sgv and other communities don’t benefit. Don’t tax small business in a recession. Don’t tax our children’s children either. Mta mistakenly underestimated their needs in 09. Why trust them anew when clearly, they can’t count. Mta… too large to fail?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Who Is Lining Up to Fight Measure M

|
So far, most of Streetsblog L.A.’s coverage of Measure M, Metro’s sales tax proposal that will be on the fall ballot, has been positive. With our eyes fixed on graphics showing the growth of our rail and rapid bus network, a robust active transportation funding program, and some flexibility in the language allocating highway funding; […]

Beyond the Spin, Breaking Down Measure J

|
On Monday, October 15, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa was feeling good. The Los Angeles Times and the Los Angeles Newspaper Group, which includes the Daily News, Daily Breeze, Long Beach Press-Telegram, SGV Tribune and Pasadena Star-News, had endorsed Measure J. In front of the hundreds of transit advocates and professionals at Railvolution, a sales tax extension […]

Measure J and the future of [transit in] L.A.

|
(This is the third of four op/eds on Measure J that Streetsblog will publish this week. Monday, Gloria Ohland of Move L.A. made the case for Measure J, yesterday the BRU made their case for a no vote. – DN) I am writing this quickly as I pack for a return trip to the land of aggressive […]

Five Things I’m Thinking About Transportation

|
When I last took a paternity leave, I returned with a brief column on some stories I would never get to flesh out that occured during my time off. Sometime after that, Steve Hymon started running an occasional “5 Things I’m Thinking About Transportation” series. I’ve rarely done it, but if it’s good enough for […]