Can Greater L.A. Ever Embrace Cleaner Transportation? Regional Plan Says, “Yes, We Will”

In 2008, the State of California passed SB 375, a landmark environmental law that aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through better planning.  The state mandated that each of the mega-regions come up with a plan to reduce emissions by completing transit projects, mandating more walkable and bikeable communities and by developing walkable mixed-use communities.  At the time, critics complained that reaching these goals would be painful at best or just undoable at worst.

To read the plan in its entirety, click on the image.

But thanks to the passage of Measure R by L.A. County voters later that year and a new focus on building mixed use communities with improved bicycle and pedestrian networks, Los Angeles County and the surrounding counties can will meet those standards.   The region’s first draft Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), released today by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), shows that the region will meet its 2020 greenhouse gas reduction target and exceed the 2035 target, double the number of people who live near high-quality transit, and reduce traffic congestion — despite the fact that the population is expected to grow by 4 million by 2035.

The draft plan shows increases transit investments by 13 percent and even as the federal legislature debate slashing funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects, the Southern California region will triple.  The current long term plan shows a $1.8 billion investment in people powered transportation, but SCAG proposes over tripling that total to $6 billion. the funding for bike and pedestrian projects. On the transit side, it plans for the build-out of 12 new rail lines and other Measure R projects.  For the rest of the region: bus rapid transit projects in Orange, San Bernardino and Riverside counties and enhanced Metrolink service with the goal of doubling Metrolink ridership.

SCAG hardly has a reputation for progressive transportation planning, but in recent years that reputation has slowly begun the change.  Today, environmentalists and progressive transportation reformers alike praised the new draft plan for being a crucial step in creating a sustainable Southern California.

“The draft RTP/SCS shows the region is on track to meet air quality and GHG reduction goals, and to provide people with more choices about where to live and how to get around,” said Denny Zane, executive director of Move LA. “It also shows cities have been doing good planning, which will put Southern California ahead of national trends in the real estate market and the energy economy.”

The plan also shows that the number of new homes that will be built in neighborhoods with high-quality transit will increase from 34 percent of all homes to 51 percent. The number of new jobs near transit will increase from 39 percent to 53 percent.

“Clearly somebody’s been paying attention,” added Amanda Eaken, NRDC’s deputy director of sustainable communities. “This plan reflects the market realities of the 21st Century: Most people want to live closer to their jobs and shops, and don’t want to spend hours stuck in the car or looking for parking. This plan gives us more choices to get out of our cars and the freedom to spend the time and money on more enjoyable activities.”

The plan also shows that this more compact development will save 400 square miles of open space, and the plan results in other significant benefits, including:

  • Providing for transportation improvements that will create 4.2 million jobs;
  • Reducing VMT (vehicle miles traveled) by 10 percent;
  • Increasing investment in public transit by 13 percent;
  • Resulting in savings of $3,400 annually in costs for autos, fuels, water, energy;
  • Saving $5 billion in infrastructure costs to local governments;
  • Saving $1.5 billion in health costs.

A final plan will be adopted by SCAG’s 84-member Regional Council in April of 2012. SCAG is the nation’s largest metropolitan planning organization, representing six counties, 191 cities, and more than 18 million residents in six Southern California counties.

  • Seems like a good plan to me.
    What I find most interesting is SCAG clearly wants both high-speed rail AND making improvements to LOSSAN, Metrolink and growing out Metro Rail.

    They don’t see it as an either/or or another “bus vs. rail” false choice.  Instead, they see the systems as complementing each other.

  • DJB

    The plan may say “yes we will”, but what are individual cities and counties, who ultimately have land use authority, saying?

    There the bag is more mixed. Some places are embracing mixed-use zoning and density near transit, while others are fighting for the car-oriented status quo tooth and nail. I guess that’s a given in an immense SCAG region that encompasses places as diverse as Hollywood, Temecula, and Imperial County.

    There’s still a lot of work to do in making the case for land use policies that would compliment more progressive transportation investment.

  • DJB

    The plan may say “yes we will”, but what are individual cities and counties, who ultimately have land use authority, saying?

    There the bag is more mixed. Some places are embracing mixed-use zoning and density near transit, while others are fighting for the car-oriented status quo tooth and nail. I guess that’s a given in an immense SCAG region that encompasses places as diverse as Hollywood, Temecula, and Imperial County.

    There’s still a lot of work to do in making the case for land use policies that would compliment more progressive transportation investment.

  • Yeah, the plan says “yes, we will” but cities that aren’t just blowing smoke up your ass can say “yes, we have”. Long Beach excepted, the amount of empty talk and half-assed “solutions” (sharrows on crappy streets come to mind) are pathetic when cities like Portland, Berkeley, SF, etc. are actually making things better. LA (and Santa Monica) say they want to attract all those hip, sexy tech companies from the bay, but they’re not going to get the hip, sexy people who appreciate bikeable, walkable, and transit-able commutes and communities until they can at least manage to lie slightly more convincingly.

  • My comment wasn’t entirely fair. SM has done a fair amount with the bike center, and light sensors. LA, while I realize they added the 7th street lane, is still a horrid place to ride every time I try doing so.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

SGC Awards Grants to Boost Smarter Urban Planning in CA Cities

|
The Strategic Growth Council, a state committee made up of representatives from six California agencies, awarded over $40 million in planning grants last week for projects large and small that are aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. One of the grants went to the Los Angeles City Planning Department to help quantify the GHG emission reductions […]

Streetsblog Interview: Michael Woo

|
Michael Woo has a long history fighting for a cleaner Los Angeles.  In the late 1980’s, he was the rare City Councilman who was also a trained urban planner and had a strong showing in the 1993 Mayoral Election coming up short to Mayor Riordan.  He currently teaches urban planning at USC, and consultant to […]

“This Plan Will Make Air Pollution a Relic of Our History”

|
Earlier today, the Southern California Association of Governments unanimously passed the 2015-2035 Long Range Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy to guide local transportation planning and investment in the six county region SCAG oversees.  While past SCAG plans have focused on building out the highway network, this plan conforms to new state laws requiring that transportation planning […]