Bundy Triangle Park Revisited: Is One of These Not Like the Other?

Palisades Triangle Park succeeds at being the neighborhood's living room. Can Bundy Triangle Park do the same?

This spring, livable streets activists on the Westside began working with L.A. City Councilman Bill Rosendahl’s office to reopen Bundy Triangle Park. A May 9 Streetsblog article titled, “Open Space Behind Bars,” looked at the history of the park: when it opened, why it closed, and what can be done to transform it into a vibrant public space.

Part of the challenge of opening the Bundy Triangle Park has been figuring out how to keep it in active use, in order to allay concerns about it becoming a place for the homeless to seek shelter. (That said, to address the problem of homelessness, I’d hope public officials would work to address the underlying causes, instead of “treating” its symptoms by closing off dearly needed public spaces.)

Compounding that challenge, in West L.A. it seemed that there were few, if any, models for how to make a small slice of public green space a dynamic gathering point. After all, Bundy Triangle doesn’t have the scale or facilities of a full-fledged park. Rather, it’s ideal role would be as the public front porch of the community — a place for residents to congregate and linger as they go about their daily business.

Google bird's-eye view of Palisades Triangle Park

And then it hit me: Palisades Triangle Park.

The similarities between the two were striking: older public spaces with mature trees and extensive shade; grassy patches and benches for seating; surrounded by retail and coffee shops; bordered by a major east-west arterial served by Metro and Big Blue Bus; and the presence of homeless individuals — even more so in the Palisades.

And perhaps most importantly politically speaking, both parks are in Councilman Rosendahl’s district — to Rosendahl’s credit, he’s voiced qualified support for opening Bundy Triangle.

The similarities between the two parks begs two questions: What are the differences, then, between the two communities and two parks? And why can’t this West L.A. neighborhood have a great public space like the Palisades does?

With respect to the first question, the Bundy Triangle Park has been closed since the 1990s, so it’s not entirely clear how the community would embrace it and thus compare it to its fellow triangle park. But clearly Bundy has potential.

One of the keys, as demonstrated in the Palisades, is for local businesses to embrace the open space as a unique asset and use it to their advantage.

At Bundy and Santa Monica there’s a Starbucks and IHOP across the street; how about an expansion of alfresco dining? There are also hundreds of bus boardings every day on six bus lines; Bundy Triangle Park could serve as a Westside multi-modal transportation hub.

Most important of all, there’s a critical mass of Westside residents surrounding Bundy Triangle Park — upwards of 30,000 per square mile according to Census data — and these Angelenos are starved for vibrant public green space.

With such a good model already in place, let’s embrace the lessons it can offer and leverage this underutilized community resource in Bundy Triangle Park to create a truly livable community.

  • ry

    I’d also love to see a triangular urban micropark placed at the confluence of Traction Ave, E. 3rd St, and Rose St, in the Arts District:
    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=34.045868,-118.236891&ll=34.04601,-118.236676&spn=0.006525,0.009173&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=23.875,57.630033&num=1&z=17

  • Eric B

    One option might be to reconfigure Ohio such that the park feels less like a traffic island with cars all around and more like a “front porch” to the businesses fronting on Ohio.  This could also free up some real estate for an active commercial use.  Too bad Starbucks is on the opposite side of the street.

    Keep up the good fight and tear down those bars!

  • CarltonGlub

    Originally, Ohio wasn’t as wide at that segment and the triangle was much larger, but LADOT punched a hole in the triangle park to, you guessed it, add car capacity.

  • Irwinc

    The solution seems pretty obvious to me… close off Ohio (it’s redundant) and make it part of the park. The little stub of Ohio is only being used by cars turning right on to Santa Monica from Bundy… These cars can queue up at the intersection of Bundy/Santa Monica like all other intersections. Take the 200 feet of pavement and put grass on it (so the “triangle” becomes a parallelogram) and we can enlarged the park and connected to pedestrians paths and residential neighborhood to the south.

  • So crazy! I live two blocks from there and I always wondered why it was perpetually closed. 

    Ohio is pretty useless and people don’t know you can use that for a left turn. 

    One major difference, that was kind of noted in the article, is the surrounding community and businesses. The palisades has concentrated and high density of businesses in one area–the only businesses in the area, encouraging a walkable community. In contrast, the area around the bundy triangle is COMPLETELY spread out. There just isn’t much to keep people in one area. 

    The answer? Sure we can say “more mixed use!” but concentration is the missing ingredient here.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Today’s Headlines

|
Judge Denies Restraining Order, Allows Metro Regional Connector Construction To Proceed (LAT) Adam Ruins Everything Podcast Interviews LADOT GM Seleta Reynolds Nine Great Things About Metro Bike Share (Medium) …The DTLA Bike-Share System Has Room To Grow (NextCity) Highland Park Tennants Planning Rent Strike (KPCC) L.A. Plans Transit-Oriented Communities Along Future Van Nuys Blvd Rail […]

Today’s Headlines

|
Garcetti Traffic Plan: $1 Million for Best Idea. “Experts” Scoff (LA Weekly) Supes: Would Opening Grand Park to Free Filming Squeeze the Public? (LAT) West L.A. Neighborhood Council Hears Proposal on Bundy Boulevard Widening (Curbed) HSR Construction Contractor Says They’ll Build Central Valley Segment Under Budget (CAHSR Blog) Another Feature on the L.A. Media’s Favorite […]

Today’s Headlines

|
Driver Who Crashed Into Expo Tracks Was Drunk (LAist, LAT) Bike-Share Coming To Downtown L.A. 2016, Pasadena 2017 (L.A. Magazine) Overview Of Expo/Bundy TOD Martin Expo Town Center (Urbanize) How To Inter-Agency Transfer From Foothill Transit To Metro Rail (Footnotes) Carnage: Motorcyclist Dies Crashing Into Tree in Elysian Valley (Eastsider) West Hollywood’s $18M 200-Space Robo-Garage Opens […]