L.A. Bikeway Implementation Improved But Short of Stated 40 Miles Annually

(Update, July 7: Jane Choi from the Planning Department called me to inform me that the “40 miles per year” goal didn’t start until July 1, 2011, the start of the fiscal year.  While it seems an odd date to start an implementation plan for the 2010 Bike Plan, it is the start of the first fiscal year after the Mayor promised cyclists “40 miles per year.”  Regardless, this means the clock is ticking.  L.A., you have 358 days to provide 40 new miles of bike facilities. – DN)

The city of Los Angeles’ “2010” bike plan was approved March 1st 2011. The overdue passage received praise from the media, who called it “comprehensive“, “historic” and “[if built, marks] one of the most lasting achievements of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s tenure.” The bike plan won an award from the Los Angeles section of the American Planning Association.

Are the new MLK Bike Lanes the exception or the rule?

Mayor Villaraigosa and others have touted the plan’s 1600 miles of bikeways, and pledged to implement 40 miles each year. Last week, the mayor released a July 1st 2011 Executive Directive on Implementation of the 2010 Bike Plan. The directive reiterates the 40 miles/year commitment, and commits other city departments to include bikes in various city projects.

With the new directive, and the start of a new fiscal year, Streetsblog takes a look at how the “2010” plan implementation is going so far. Streetsblog readers will recall that the city bike plan includes a “5-year” implementation plan. As noted in the initial Streetsblog review of the implementation plan, the “5-year” plan, based on planned completion dates is actually an 8-9 implementation plan. The implementation plan online includes dates – ie: includes “Year 0” for “Project Year 2010”, through “Year 5” for “Project Year 2015.” Though in the final council file version, the dates have been scrubbed and replaced by priority 1 through 3, with no dates specified.

Given that it’s now July 2011, the “2010” bike plan is, theoretically, a year and a half into its implementation plan timeline, which began with “project year 2010.” Just how many miles of bike lane is the city of Los Angeles implementing? Are L.A. cyclists seeing that “commitment to build 40 miles of bikeway a year” in themayor’s directive? How does recent implementation compare to past performance?

While, overall, the city has been exceeding its past (lackluster) performance, it appears that the 40 miles annually remains elusive.

From 1996 until late 2009, under the city’s 1996 Bicycle Master Plan, Los Angeles implemented a total of 66.7 new miles of bike lane. Dividing the 66.7 miles by the 13 years, the city implemented an average of about 5.1 miles of bike lane each year.

In 2009, the city implemented a total of 4.09 miles of bike lane: (Bike lane projects listings below are in rough date order, with from/to limits in parenthesis.)

In 2010, the city did significantly better, roughly triple its yearly average with15.3 miles of bike lane:

In 2010, in addition to 15.3 miles of bike lanes, the city implemented 8.3 miles of “enhanced bike routes” (sharrows) and 2.6 miles of bike paths (L.A. River), for an overall 2010 total of 26.2 new miles of bikeway.

With 2011 halfway through, the city has so far striped 5.54 miles of bike lane.

There are additional projects anticipated in 2011. These include 7th St, Vermont Ave (in South L.A.), additional mileage on York Blvd, Reseda Blvd, and Main St (in Venice),  and some others. Even if all those come through, it appears that the city is on a trajectory to fall short of 40 miles in 2011. To get 40 in 2011,  the city will need to implement bike facilities about seven times more quickly in the second half of 2011 than it has done in the first half… which runs somewhat counter to the city’s plan to subject many relatively straightforward projects to lengthy and costly environmental review studies.

In addition to quantity, quality is important. From 2009 through mid-2011, the city has striped two-thirds of its new bike lanes (~17 miles out of ~25 miles, listed above) in the San Fernando Valley, predominantly in the northwest Valley, arguably the city’s most suburban communities. Plenty of Valley folks bike, and bike lanes are welcome and needed in the Valley… but it appears that the city is not necessarily responding to increased levels of bicycling in the northwest Valley, but instead tending to implement bike lanes where there are excessively wide suburban streets that, often, accommodate bike lanes without removing any car lanes.

At the same time, the city has neglected to implement any bikeways in the urban core. The bike lane closest to Los Angeles City Hall (Hoover Street beginning at Venice Blvd) is just over 3 miles bike ride from City Hall. As has been advocated by the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition, new bikeways are especially needed in population-dense core communities. In these neighborhoods, where shorter trips are conducive to cycling, many families lack access to cars and large number of working-class residents depend on the bicycle as their primary mode of transportation.

Another quality issue might be widespread downgrading of bike lanes to bike routes. If the city chooses to meet its 40 mile per year commitment primarily by merely posting bike route signage, or by merely adding sharrows, not only would this demonstrate a lack of commitment to safe effective facilities, but it would be a clear attempt to undermine the bike plan. The City Council’s approved implementation priorities include predominantly bike lanes, and some bike boulevards, called “bike friendly streets.”

While it’s good to see the city’s bike facility implementation trend upward, the overall totals don’t quite match city promises. If the mayor and council intend to make good on the 40 new bikeway miles per year they have pledged, it appears that the city needs to step up its bikeway implementation.

  • Don’t forget:
    Anahiem Street (Henry Ford to Long Beach City Limit) – 1.30 miles

  • Also:
    Riverside Drive (Fulton Avenue to Coldwater Canyon Avenue) 0.54 miles
    Riverside Drive (Woodman Avenue to Sunnyslope Drive) 0.25 miles
    Wentworth Street (Wheatland Avenue to Foothill Boulevard) 1.52 miles
    Sheldon Street (Glenoaks Boulevard to Wentworth Street) 0.30 miles

  • One more:
    Plummer Street (Reseda Boulevard to Etiwanda Avenue) 0.25 miles – linking Reseda bike lanes to Cal State Northridge.

  • Thanks for the three comments/updates – I am happy to hear that there are, by your count, a total of some 4.16 new miles that I didn’t include. Even if you were entirely correct (something I’ve learned not to expect, given the LADOT Bike Blog’s record of past lies and/or errors), it still doesn’t quite look like the city is on target for 40 miles. And by my count, you’re wrong on at least two counts.

    There are at least two errors in what you’ve listed.

    – Sheldon from Glenoaks to Wentworth, at least as of about a month ago, has no bike lanes. There’s an old fog lane southbound for part of the way, and no bike lane at all northbound.

    Regarding “Anahiem [sic] Street” – That stretch of Anaheim Street was striped prior to the 1996 bike plan. It was listed as complete in 1996… and the paint deteriorated to the point where in some areas the lane is difficult to see (similar to the city’s neglect of the 98th Street bike lanes.) Though it’s good news if the city has actually re-striped this facility – it needed it… I just don’t count maintaining existing facilities in the new mileage category. (Don’t take my word for it, look at these Google earth images: http://tinyurl.com/anaheimstbl1 and http://tinyurl.com/anaheimstbl2 – The bike plan claims existing facilities as future new in a few places, including Anaheim Street, and streets inside Griffith Park, too. I submittted this in my comments way back when I was working for CICLE, but the input was ignored.)

    I am not sure if you’re correct or not about the other 2.5 miles you’ve listed… I will check them out.

  • Allenlulu

    I bike the Expo line every week. While the eastbound side is smooth and new, I can safely say that the westbound side…well, let’s just say you can paint a line over a series of cracks and potholes but that don’t make it a bike lane. The road is almost as treacherous as Wilshire. After 40 years of riding, I busted my first spoke on that “lane”.

  • @ Joe – if you can point out any point where I have intentionally lied, please show me and I will apologize.  If not, please refrain from ad hominem.

  • @ Christopher K. The earliest LADOT Bike Blog lie I remember was
    “Most cities make sidewalk riding illegal, but LA is an exception.” 

    The most recent LADOT Bike Blog lie I remember is:
    “Many of the bike lanes in the 1996 Bike Plan were listed as “experimental corridors”, meaning that they too would have needed environmental review before implementation. Needless to say, almost none of them were built, with lack of environmental clearance as one of their biggest stumbling blocks.”

  • Off-topic, but what do cyclists think about motorcyclists anyway? They are more vulnerable on the road than automobile drivers yet they use gas-powered vehicles. Sympathize or screw ’em?

  • Roadblock

    As a bicyclist, I completely sympathize with motorcyclists because they are vulnerable users just like us.

  • MarkB

    Some of us are both. 

  • Anonymous

    My plumber lost his leg while riding a motorcycle, so, yeah, I sympathize. It wasn’t an accident — someone ran him off the road.

  • Marcotico

    Fight Fight Fight!   This is a perfect situation in which to use the grade school standard “I’ll meet you at the BIKE RACKS!” 

    …except of course if activists get their way the bike racks will no longer be located out back where teachers can’t break up the fight!

  • Rick Risemberg

    Joe, you said of Chris  Kidd: ‘@ Christopher K. The earliest LADOT Bike Blog lie I remember was
    “Most cities make sidewalk riding illegal, but LA is an exception.” ‘
    But you are wrong here. The Los Angeles Municipal Code 56.15 states: “1.     No person shall ride, operate or use a bicycle, unicycle, skateboard, cart, wagon, wheelchair, rollerskates, or any other device moved exclusively by human power, on a sidewalk, bikeway or boardwalk in a willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property.”

    In fact, LA does permit riding on the sidewalk; you just have to be considerate of other users. Bikes are included with skateboards, wheelchairs, et al as legitimate sidewalk users.

    On this one, you’re definitely wrong. Or lying yourself.

    You’ve been calling a lot of people liars in public lately, Joe. Including folks like Kang Hu at a recent BPIT meeting–someone who’s putting his ass on the line to get multi modal LOS accepted in LADOT, something that would help our cause tremendously.

    Pretty sad, and ineffective to boot.

  • What’s not true is the “Most cities make sidewalk riding illegal” part. It’s not true for L.A. County… nor for California, nor the US, nor the world. What you state about the L.A. sidewalk riding law is, of course, correct – but not what’s at issue here. I find it irritating that LADOT Bike Blog publishes false information that makes it sound like most cities make sidewalk riding illegal when that’s not true.

    When you say I’ve been “calling a lot of people liars in public” whom are you referring to? (and have I been calling the “liars in public” or have I been publicly calling people liars? looks like a misplaced modifier to me.) Who are the “lot” of people?

    What I recall saying to LADOT’s Kang Hu was that I don’t trust opaque decisions by the LADOT because the LADOT has lied to us in the past, most prominently regarding the Reseda bike lanes lies, story detailed here, with very clear LADOT lying: http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/08/14/does-ladot-headquarters-know-whats-happening-in-district-offices/ 

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Looking into Los Angeles Draft Bike Plan Implementation Strategy

|
The city of Los Angeles is in the process of releasing the components of its 2010 draft Bicycle Plan, available at the city’s website. The plan’s chapters and most of its maps were released in early June 2010. On Thursday July 22nd, the city released its "Five Year Implementation Strategy." Still remaining unreleased is the actual […]

LADOT’s FY11-12: A Banner Year for Bikeways

|
Back in a January 2012 L.A. Streetsblog article, Joe Linton stated that LADOT was “not quite on track” to complete Mayor Villaraigosa’s pledge for 40 new miles of bikeway each year. In that article, Linton projected only 31 new miles to be completed during Fiscal Year 2011-2012. The fiscal year ended two weeks ago, and LADOT […]

LADOT Releases Annual Report, New Bikeway Mileage Declining

|
Last week, the L.A. City Department of Transportation (LADOT) released its Annual Report for the 2015-2016 Fiscal Year [PDF]. There are plenty of worthwhile accomplishments detailed in the annual report, but some disappointing news in that LADOT bikeway implementation has slowed. Among the good news are some features that Streetsblog readers may be familiar with: […]

Villaraigosa Celebrates Bike Plan Progress, Rallies for More

|
Two years ago, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and a host of city officials stood at the podium announcing a new day for cyclists in Los Angeles. Today, he was back in the same place, at the same time, to announce that the city is making progress. “CicLAvia’s success and the breakneck pace of bikeway construction demonstrate […]

A Look at LADOT’s Annual Report and Bike Lane Implementation

|
The city of Los Angeles Transportation Department (LADOT) released its fiscal year 2014-2015 Annual Report [PDF] last week. From the LADOT General Manager’s message introducing the report: This year alone, we responded to 18,381 citizen requests, installed 38.2 miles of bikeways, helped Angelenos get to 300 special events, and kept Metro on track to deliver 26 new […]