SBX211 Retro Active
Immunity given to California judges for openly taking bribes. Judges are
employees of the state they receive their pay and benefits from the state. The
Los Angeles Superior court judges are currently receiving an additional
$57.688,00 from the county of Los Angeles. there is no bigger user of the court
than L.A. County.(A party to the case and has a financial interest in most
cases in the courts) Those payments were found to be unconstitutional / illegal
in Sturgeon vs L.A. County. after that decision the judges paid a lobbyist to
pass SBX211 ( RETRO ACTIVE IMMUNITY )

SBX211 does not restore
due process

SBX211 violates Article 1
section 9

SBX211 violates the 14th
amendment (no equal protections)

SBX211 violate checks and
balances between legislative and Judicial powers

Judges do not disclose the
county payments at the onset of any trial where the county is either a party to
the case or has a financial interest. (Judges violate Judicial codes of ethics)

Judges refuse to recuse
themselves when requested under CCP170

Judges find themselves
unbiased and then file an order striking statement.

In the year of 2010 alone
$57,688.00 per year per judge X 460 judges = $26,709.544.00 paid to judges from
L.A. County from tax payer money to only have the judges rule against the tax
payer in favor of L.A. County or the County’s interest. THE BRIBES WORK.

 HISTORY OF RETRO ACTIVE IMMUNITY IN THE UNITED STATES

1. given for
unconstitutional use of torture

2. given for illegal
merger of banks (we can see the effects of that now)

3. given to telecom
company for illegal wire taps. (Fisa bill that led to the patriot act)

4. SBX211 given to Judges
for taking bribes.

SBX211 is evidence of
conspiracy of the California legislative branch of government to cover up the
multiple felony’s committed by the Judicial branch of government. By an act of
Legislation, California’s judicial branch has admitted to be corrupt.

SECTION FROM SBX211

This bill would provide
that no governmental entity, or officer or employee of a governmental entity,
shall incur any liability or be subject to prosecution or disciplinary action
because of benefits provided to a judge under the official action of a
governmental entity prior to the effective date of this bill on the ground that
those benefits were not authorized under law.

“FRAUD ON THE COURT”

If you want to really effectively piss people off for life, build something next to their house at 4AM. Metro doesn’t need any more enemies. This kind of stuff should be common sense.

Do unto others . . .

its 4:20 AM and every morning I am awakened by loud noise which is impacting my quality of life. The construction is right outside where I live and its causing me not to sleep. the last time I checked humans need sleep in order to function! If you have never sleeped through someone drilling or or loud equipment I would be willing to allow you to spend one night or a few hours in my place to see if your dumb comments about complaints would stay the same… if you live in some remote area far away from any busy streets then you should shut your dumb mouth… many people live in this area in lofts like I do and this construction is causing people not to sleep. Also, I definately plan to move before the train comes so I dont have to hear the f***in bell or horn blow everytime it will pass this street, It does it down the street so Im sure I will hear it when it passes my loft. Im going to contact the city and who ever is responsible for this and ask them to come stay in my place for a night and see if they can sleep… this is abusive and constuction should always be during the day… when the city is alive not at night when silence is golden.

I’ve lived in this neighborhood for 66 years; I remember the trains that used to run on those tracks. They did not make anything approaching the noise that the proposed project will make, and they did not disrupt traffic most of the day. They ran no more than twice a day, not over five hundred times a day.

It seems this would be very easy to get into law. When I bought my house near Long Beach Airport, I had to sign disclosures that I understood I was near an airport, as well as possibly military ordinance.

Anyway, this ROW was used for both rail transit and freight. Over half of the section between the 10 and the 405, the ROW is deep in a canyon, where there are no at-grade street crossings and where it is far enough away from most houses that people will barely hear anything.

The 10 freeway roars past their neighborhood 24-7: it will mask most train noise.

Anyway, these people live in the middle of America’s second-largest city. They can put up with a little city noise.

Can I suggest some phrasing for your law?:

“Any person who purchases or rents a dwelling within x feet of an existing railroad right of way thereby forefiets any future claim to reasonable mitigations which would enhance his/her quality of life. Said persons must suffer in silence no matter how inappropriate the design or what the prospects for mitigating its defects.”

I think there should be some kind of law passed where if someone buys a house next to existing railroad tracks, they automatically forfeit ALL rights to file any complaints. Period.

Neighbors in Cheviot Hills, West of Westwood, Westwood Gardens, and Rancho Park have written an excellent flier to correct misinformation and invite their neighbors to work constructively on fitting Phase 2 of the Expo Line into their neighborhoods.

You can download their “NEIGHBORS … WORKING WITH NEIGHBORS … FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD” flier, and read about the opponents’ lawsuit, at http://friends4expo.org/news.htm .

Please, they should be happy they aren’t just getting a damn overcrowded bus.