Did You Miss Streetsblog’s Coverage of the Metro Board?

Way back when I first started writing Street Heat, one of the way that I attracted readers was to do long, in-depth coverage of Metro Board meetings.  I would write a preview beforehand and a review afterward.  When Street Heat moved to Streetsblog, I continued the practice even though the other Streetsblogs would just cover any news that came out of their local MTA meetings.

So here’s the deal, when I looked at this week’s agenda, I noticed it was somewhat lacking in high profile decisions compared to some of the others.  Sure, there was Ridley-Thomas’ motion to audit Metro’s legal division, a plan to delay implementation of HOT Lanes, and the official addition of an underground option to the environmental reviews of the Downtown Connector; but The Source and other news outlets more than delivered the news.  So, I decided to take a month off from doing the full Metro Board analysis to see what the reaction would be.

Here’s my question to you: Did you miss my coverage?  Next month, do you want me to go back to writing a preview earlier in the week and a full recap afterward?  Did you miss my sarcastic coverage of all the contradictory things Metro Board members say?  Or would you rather me spend my time on other articles and just covering the major news out of Metro?  Were the other stories I wrote on Tuesday and Thursday better than my usual Metro Board coverage?

Let me know in the comments section.  Remember, I’m not talking about possible not covering Metro and its Board Meetings, just focusing on the news stories from the meetings only.  And if you tell me you want the "old" Board coverage back, well, that’s what we’ll do.

  • I actually did miss the preview coverage, but only because I have come to rely on Streetsblog and the Metro Library’s transportation headlines for all of my transportation news. If you had just linked The Source I could have figured it out.

  • Really, this last meeting was not very eventful. The two things of interest to passengers were an even greater restriction on public comment (moving public comment on Consent Calendar items to the general public comment period, prior to a majority of the MTA board members sitting in their seats) and the motion to have the MTA staff evaluate placing pay toilets at some of the outlying Metro stations. Oh, and Tom LaBonge had the bright idea of putting a subway station at Sixth Street right next to the subway yard – I fail to see the purpose of that, other than having trains waste time to get to a station that very few people want to go to.

  • LAofAnaheim

    I think LaBonge’s plan for a new downtown station by the Arts District would be great. The infrastructure is there and there is a growing population with the Arts District. A new station could really help densify a part of LA that should be dense. If the station would be used as a catalyst for development, then I say go with it!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Metro’s Stealth "Short Term" Fare Hike

|
We’ve spent a lot of time on this blog praising many of Metro’s transit expansion plans, but out of today’s City Council Transportation Committee Hearing came news that the administration, not board, of Metro has unilaterally decided to terminate its fare reimbursement agreement with LADOT. This means that starting January 1, commuters who use both […]

The Week in Livable Streets Events

|
Wow, there are some important head to head meetings on Tuesday and Wednesday night. Tuesday – The City of Santa Monica wants to officially shame Los Angeles on bike infrastructure in every possible way. While L.A. waits for Bike Nation to get it’s act together, remember when kiosks were going to be on the ground […]

Memories of Julian Burke

|
Kudos to the Los Angeles Times for its excellent obituary memorializing former Metro CEO Julian Burke. His tenure was during the period when I actually attended Metro Board meetings. These days I figure between Steve Hymon of The Source, Laura Nelson of the Los Angeles Times and our own Damien Newton you don’t have to […]

The Week in Livable Streets Events

|
Do you like Metro public meetings? What if I were to tell you they were meetings for the I-710 Big Dig and the High Desert Corridor? Not excited? Well, good news! There are also meetings for Metro Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday – We’ve written that despite being the largest highway expansion project being debated in the […]

Thoughts on Metro’s Fare Restructuring

|
(I want to be explicit this is solely my own opinion, and in no way endorsed by either Streetsblog or Southern California Transit Advocates – DG But I can’t help notice that So.CA.TA. has a special meeting just to discuss the changes this Saturday. – DN) Metro staff recently released two options for fare restructuring […]