Rail Expert Reutter: CA and FL Deserve More HSR Funding

Mark Reutter, author of the industrial tome Making Steel and a veteran editor of Railroad History, can safely be called an expert on the train industry. And in a new memo for the Progressive Policy Institute, he is issuing a warning to the Obama administration on its high-profile push for high-speed rail.

speeding_train.jpgCalifornia’s high-speed rail project, above, got $2.25B last month for a line expected to cost at least $40B. (Photo: CAHSRA)

If high-speed rail thinkers can be divided into two
schools of thought — one envisioning an all-in push for nationwide
service, as epitomized by U.S. PIRG, and another preferring to focus on building out one or two successful systems — Reutter is strongly in the latter camp.

He
argues that the U.S. DOT misspent its first round of high-speed rail
funds by focusing too much on upgrades of existing Amtrak line that are
not expected to top 150 miles per hour, putting most U.S. projects a
cut below true bullet trains in Europe and China.

Reutter
asks why Florida and California — the only two states pursuing
dedicated passenger rail lines that reach international speed standards
— did not receive more significant amounts of money, and he lays the
blame at the feet of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA):

There was no precedent for what it had been tasked to do by
President Obama. Awarding high-speed passenger projects was a new
responsibility for which the agency was largely unprepared and
unequipped.

Because it lacked personnel with backgrounds in HSR, the FRA fell
back on what it knew best – conventional railway operations – to
evaluate grant applications from the states. And the state applications
were mostly dusted-off commuter-rail or incremental Amtrak projects,
because most state DOTs have no more experience in executing HSR
projects than the federal government.

Out of this confluence of modest state applications chasing humble
FRA guidelines came a welter of small-scale upgrades – fixing signal
systems here and adding a new siding there – that collectively do
little to advance a new mode of intercity travel in America.

We have to do better.

Will Reutter’s criticism sway the course of future federal rail investments?

Much
may depend on how quickly infrastructure companies move forward with
new factories and other job-creating work in states with bullet-train
money to spend. If the private sector holds off until Florida and
California can show that their rail projects are fiscally viable in the
long term, the next round of $2.5 billion in high-speed grants may well look more targeted.

  • We’ll add a link to Mr. Rutter’s commentaries to the information page on the state high speed rail program on the SO.CA.TA website. Nice to have some informed analysis to list…

    http://socata.net/18.html

  • Blaine Peterson

    I could not agree more with Mr. Reutter’s comments related to the type of system the gov’t should pursue. I don’t believe the FRA is to blame, however.
    I’m a career Railroad (Civil) engineer. I’ve been involved in the design, construction and maintenance of all forms of track from freight railway, to LRT to international High Speed Rail (HSR) systems over the past 25 years. The absolute best approach is related to bringing a single functioning system to the American people to sample. Florida represents an ideal setting. Most Americans look at the variety of existing passenger rail systems operating in the U.S. today as indictative of what they might expect from a “true” HSR system. These systems differ more substantially than even public buses and personal automobiles.
    “True” HSR systems, such as those planned in Florida and California promise levels of service well above those possible in personal automobiles. And contrary to the numerous claims and concerns by stakeholders and opponents, “true” HSR systems enjoy a much higher fare-box return and lower operating ratio than conventional railway and LRT systems.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

High-Speed Rail: Do We Have the Will?

|
Tomorrow morning, I’m getting on a train from Washington, DC to New York. It’s going to take me almost three-and-a-half hours to get there. Sure, I could pay more for an Acela and get there in less than three hours. But why can’t it take 90 minutes? Yesterday, Amtrak unveiled a plan [PDF] to build […]
STREETSBLOG USA

One More Reason Not to Trust Reason’s Attacks on Rail

|
The Reason Foundation is one of the most persistent rail opponents in the United States. With remarkable consistency, Reason condemns high-speed rail, private intercity rail projects, and local transit expansions. No matter how shaky its numbers may be, you can count on Reason to undermine any transit project that runs on rails. Shane Phillips at Better Institutions was […]