<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Economic Potential of Portland’s New Bike Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/16/32991/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/16/32991/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umberto Brayj</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/16/32991/comment-page-1/#comment-158161</link>
		<dc:creator>Umberto Brayj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=32991#comment-158161</guid>
		<description>This is the sort of argument that will help make LA more bike friendly. When you account for all the benefits, and the low cost, of building more bike-friendly surface streets vs. car-only sewer pipes the bikes tend to win out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the sort of argument that will help make LA more bike friendly. When you account for all the benefits, and the low cost, of building more bike-friendly surface streets vs. car-only sewer pipes the bikes tend to win out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

