<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expo Board Approves FEIR for Phase II.  Off to Construction or Off to Court?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/05/expo-board-approves-feir-for-phase-ii-off-to-construction-or-off-to-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/05/expo-board-approves-feir-for-phase-ii-off-to-construction-or-off-to-court/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hitienseque</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/05/expo-board-approves-feir-for-phase-ii-off-to-construction-or-off-to-court/comment-page-1/#comment-539103</link>
		<dc:creator>Hitienseque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=31541#comment-539103</guid>
		<description>Houston, TX - The Houston Texans signed Andre Johnson to a two-year develop magnitude on Thursday, a see to that, according to the Houston Chronicle, makes him the highest paid far-reaching receiver in the NFL.

Johnson, 29, led the NFL in receiving yards the mould two seasons and had five years and $35 million surviving on his existing contract.

The Account reported the increase to be worth $38.5 million, including $13 million guaranteed. On normal, Johnson resolution in the present circumstances order $10.5 million per year settled the next seven seasons, not including effectuation incentives.

&quot;I in any case said I wanted to put on in compensation one cooperate, and to be skilful to depict representing the Houston Texans as a remedy for my in one piece profession is a tremendous honor,&quot; Johnson said. &quot;I each time said I wanted to be part of something memorable, and I knew that coming to a altered organization, things were going to be a slight disrespectful in the origin, and with it I have a hunch like things are attractive that turn for the benefit of us.&quot;

The University of Miami-Florida yield has burnt- his thorough seven-year m‚tier in Houston after the Texans selected him with the third blanket pick in the 2003 NFL Draft.

Johnson has recorded back-to-back 1,500-yard receiving seasons, including a 101-catch, 1,569-yard campaign pattern year. He also scored nine touchdowns in 2009 to up his race mount up to to 42 TDs in 102 games.

&quot;As a service to the mould two years, cipher has played to the honest that this girlish cover shackles has as long that I&#039;ve been around, other than at one other person,&quot; said nut cram Gary Kubiak. &quot;What he&#039;s been doing has been special, and there&#039;s a collection more to come. So, that&#039;s prospering to be exciting.&quot;

He has caught 587 passes for the sake of 7,948 yards as a remainder the passage of his career, just two of the numerous club records he owns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Houston, TX &#8211; The Houston Texans signed Andre Johnson to a two-year develop magnitude on Thursday, a see to that, according to the Houston Chronicle, makes him the highest paid far-reaching receiver in the NFL.</p>
<p>Johnson, 29, led the NFL in receiving yards the mould two seasons and had five years and $35 million surviving on his existing contract.</p>
<p>The Account reported the increase to be worth $38.5 million, including $13 million guaranteed. On normal, Johnson resolution in the present circumstances order $10.5 million per year settled the next seven seasons, not including effectuation incentives.</p>
<p>&#8220;I in any case said I wanted to put on in compensation one cooperate, and to be skilful to depict representing the Houston Texans as a remedy for my in one piece profession is a tremendous honor,&#8221; Johnson said. &#8220;I each time said I wanted to be part of something memorable, and I knew that coming to a altered organization, things were going to be a slight disrespectful in the origin, and with it I have a hunch like things are attractive that turn for the benefit of us.&#8221;</p>
<p>The University of Miami-Florida yield has burnt- his thorough seven-year m‚tier in Houston after the Texans selected him with the third blanket pick in the 2003 NFL Draft.</p>
<p>Johnson has recorded back-to-back 1,500-yard receiving seasons, including a 101-catch, 1,569-yard campaign pattern year. He also scored nine touchdowns in 2009 to up his race mount up to to 42 TDs in 102 games.</p>
<p>&#8220;As a service to the mould two years, cipher has played to the honest that this girlish cover shackles has as long that I&#8217;ve been around, other than at one other person,&#8221; said nut cram Gary Kubiak. &#8220;What he&#8217;s been doing has been special, and there&#8217;s a collection more to come. So, that&#8217;s prospering to be exciting.&#8221;</p>
<p>He has caught 587 passes for the sake of 7,948 yards as a remainder the passage of his career, just two of the numerous club records he owns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/05/expo-board-approves-feir-for-phase-ii-off-to-construction-or-off-to-court/comment-page-1/#comment-149411</link>
		<dc:creator>A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=31541#comment-149411</guid>
		<description>Thank you for reporting on this matter! Its a great synopsis!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for reporting on this matter! Its a great synopsis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gokhan</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/05/expo-board-approves-feir-for-phase-ii-off-to-construction-or-off-to-court/comment-page-1/#comment-148321</link>
		<dc:creator>Gokhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=31541#comment-148321</guid>
		<description>Shot with my iPhone, these four clips of ten minutes each are the last 40 minutes of the board meeting that approved Expo Phase 2, which have the comments of the seven board members.

The last 40 minutes were a drama, during which Expo Phase 2 was being threatened by Ridley-Thomas&#039;s motion not to approve it. His motion had asked for an initial three-month-long Metro grade-crossing study, which would then require redoing the EIR, which would take at least an additional year, and who knows what would happen afterwards. Phase 2 would likely be killed or long-delayed.

But Zev made his impressive speech and we also heard good speeches from other board members. At the end the project got approved 6 - 0.

Comments are most welcome.

Individual links to the four clips:

(Click on the expanding arrows to watch in full screen and choose 480p for better video and sound quality)

Part 1:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbGLfKsrXMM

Part 2:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jH0UAPB9khM

Part 3:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4V8BrG5aW7Y

Part 4:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6l-3YxnRNs

Or click on this link to play the entire playlist:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbGLfKsrXMM&amp;feature=PlayList&amp;p=31A4641CB4B6C7A9&amp;index=0&amp;playnext=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shot with my iPhone, these four clips of ten minutes each are the last 40 minutes of the board meeting that approved Expo Phase 2, which have the comments of the seven board members.</p>
<p>The last 40 minutes were a drama, during which Expo Phase 2 was being threatened by Ridley-Thomas&#8217;s motion not to approve it. His motion had asked for an initial three-month-long Metro grade-crossing study, which would then require redoing the EIR, which would take at least an additional year, and who knows what would happen afterwards. Phase 2 would likely be killed or long-delayed.</p>
<p>But Zev made his impressive speech and we also heard good speeches from other board members. At the end the project got approved 6 &#8211; 0.</p>
<p>Comments are most welcome.</p>
<p>Individual links to the four clips:</p>
<p>(Click on the expanding arrows to watch in full screen and choose 480p for better video and sound quality)</p>
<p>Part 1:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbGLfKsrXMM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbGLfKsrXMM</a></p>
<p>Part 2:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jH0UAPB9khM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jH0UAPB9khM</a></p>
<p>Part 3:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4V8BrG5aW7Y" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4V8BrG5aW7Y</a></p>
<p>Part 4:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6l-3YxnRNs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6l-3YxnRNs</a></p>
<p>Or click on this link to play the entire playlist:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbGLfKsrXMM&#038;feature=PlayList&#038;p=31A4641CB4B6C7A9&#038;index=0&#038;playnext=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbGLfKsrXMM&#038;feature=PlayList&#038;p=31A4641CB4B6C7A9&#038;index=0&#038;playnext=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gokhan</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/05/expo-board-approves-feir-for-phase-ii-off-to-construction-or-off-to-court/comment-page-1/#comment-147961</link>
		<dc:creator>Gokhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=31541#comment-147961</guid>
		<description>The meeting went so orderly and well-conducted because it was the most important transit meeting in LA, whether Metro, Expo, or anything else, of all time.

I don&#039;t think NFSR will necessarily file a lawsuit. Because:

(a) There is a 98% chance that it will fail anyway.

(b) It will make them look very bad in the public eye for trying to derail a very strongly supported project.

(c) A $224-million subway station at Westwood would lead to rezoning of Rancho Park as multiresidential and heavy commercial, what NFSR dreads most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The meeting went so orderly and well-conducted because it was the most important transit meeting in LA, whether Metro, Expo, or anything else, of all time.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think NFSR will necessarily file a lawsuit. Because:</p>
<p>(a) There is a 98% chance that it will fail anyway.</p>
<p>(b) It will make them look very bad in the public eye for trying to derail a very strongly supported project.</p>
<p>(c) A $224-million subway station at Westwood would lead to rezoning of Rancho Park as multiresidential and heavy commercial, what NFSR dreads most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan K. Weeks</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/05/expo-board-approves-feir-for-phase-ii-off-to-construction-or-off-to-court/comment-page-1/#comment-147651</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan K. Weeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=31541#comment-147651</guid>
		<description>The Expo Board Meeting was a major victory for this Light Rail Project. There will be smaller battles to come but this was truly a turning point.
I was surprised by how orderly the Meeting was. Everyone got to speak their
1 minute. I was sorry to see that the two leading opponents of the line had to resort to verbal abuse of City Councilman Parks. This was the second time I have seen this tactic used on officials. Perhaps when your arguments are weak, abuse is the last chance. As for a law suit. They most likely will try to get an injuction to stop the line. Maybe they will waste thousands on a loosing battle. The Gold Line opponents spent 100&#039;s of thousands trying to stop that line but ended up loosing it all. Truly this was a victory for common sense and rationality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Expo Board Meeting was a major victory for this Light Rail Project. There will be smaller battles to come but this was truly a turning point.<br />
I was surprised by how orderly the Meeting was. Everyone got to speak their<br />
1 minute. I was sorry to see that the two leading opponents of the line had to resort to verbal abuse of City Councilman Parks. This was the second time I have seen this tactic used on officials. Perhaps when your arguments are weak, abuse is the last chance. As for a law suit. They most likely will try to get an injuction to stop the line. Maybe they will waste thousands on a loosing battle. The Gold Line opponents spent 100&#8242;s of thousands trying to stop that line but ended up loosing it all. Truly this was a victory for common sense and rationality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poncho</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/05/expo-board-approves-feir-for-phase-ii-off-to-construction-or-off-to-court/comment-page-1/#comment-147101</link>
		<dc:creator>poncho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=31541#comment-147101</guid>
		<description>smells like Palo Alto HSR corridor NIMBYs... we&#039;re against it unless you give us an expensive tunnel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>smells like Palo Alto HSR corridor NIMBYs&#8230; we&#8217;re against it unless you give us an expensive tunnel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph E</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/05/expo-board-approves-feir-for-phase-ii-off-to-construction-or-off-to-court/comment-page-1/#comment-145671</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=31541#comment-145671</guid>
		<description>NFSR&#039;s potential lawsuit is the best justification for the new station planned at Farmdale. I think a pedestrian bridge for the Farmdale High School students would have been best for the majority of people (the riders who are going to lose 40 seconds of time each way because of that extra station), but the precedent would have helped NFSR to push for grade-separations. Now Metro has a precedent for at-grade rail in a poor, black neighborhood, so it is only fair that the rich, white neighborhood get at-grade light rail as well.

Once this thing gets built, I think many of the opponents will realize the benefits. It will not be loud or visually obtrusive at ground level, and the extra traffic delays will blend in to the background of lousy traffic on Sepulveda, Overland and Westwood. As long as the trains get signal preemption or quad gates, the grade crossings won&#039;t necessarily slow down the trains at all in normal operation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NFSR&#8217;s potential lawsuit is the best justification for the new station planned at Farmdale. I think a pedestrian bridge for the Farmdale High School students would have been best for the majority of people (the riders who are going to lose 40 seconds of time each way because of that extra station), but the precedent would have helped NFSR to push for grade-separations. Now Metro has a precedent for at-grade rail in a poor, black neighborhood, so it is only fair that the rich, white neighborhood get at-grade light rail as well.</p>
<p>Once this thing gets built, I think many of the opponents will realize the benefits. It will not be loud or visually obtrusive at ground level, and the extra traffic delays will blend in to the background of lousy traffic on Sepulveda, Overland and Westwood. As long as the trains get signal preemption or quad gates, the grade crossings won&#8217;t necessarily slow down the trains at all in normal operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Newton</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/05/expo-board-approves-feir-for-phase-ii-off-to-construction-or-off-to-court/comment-page-1/#comment-145361</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=31541#comment-145361</guid>
		<description>Sorry Jarrett, here you go.

http://www.buildexpo.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Jarrett, here you go.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buildexpo.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.buildexpo.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrett at HumanTransit.org</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/05/expo-board-approves-feir-for-phase-ii-off-to-construction-or-off-to-court/comment-page-1/#comment-145171</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrett at HumanTransit.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 11:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=31541#comment-145171</guid>
		<description>Am I hallucinating, or is there no mention of this project on metro.net ?  Streetsblog&#039;s usually good about linking to these things ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I hallucinating, or is there no mention of this project on metro.net ?  Streetsblog&#8217;s usually good about linking to these things &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/05/expo-board-approves-feir-for-phase-ii-off-to-construction-or-off-to-court/comment-page-1/#comment-144631</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=31541#comment-144631</guid>
		<description>I was struck by the many Cheviot speakers who said they supported light rail but wanted it below ground. That is an oxymoron: light rail is inherently largely at-grade.

The remedy sought, a long, deep tunnel below the existing railroad right-of-way, would be unprecedented special treatment for one neighborhood that has never been built on any modern U.S. light rail line.

Good luck convincing a court that they were treated unfairly because they were not granted something that does not exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was struck by the many Cheviot speakers who said they supported light rail but wanted it below ground. That is an oxymoron: light rail is inherently largely at-grade.</p>
<p>The remedy sought, a long, deep tunnel below the existing railroad right-of-way, would be unprecedented special treatment for one neighborhood that has never been built on any modern U.S. light rail line.</p>
<p>Good luck convincing a court that they were treated unfairly because they were not granted something that does not exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Gabbard</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/05/expo-board-approves-feir-for-phase-ii-off-to-construction-or-off-to-court/comment-page-1/#comment-144371</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Gabbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=31541#comment-144371</guid>
		<description>As I posted on Wednesday, I do expect a lawsuit to be filed and that it eventually achieve little of what the opponents want. A similar type suit against the Orange Line delayed the project as some environmental documents were redrafted but the NIMBYs finally accepted a settlement basically for their legal costs being covered by Metro. We&#039;ll see if a suit even progresses beyond the initial first hearing...

http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/03/expect-plenty-of-debate-before-tomorrows-vote-on-the-expo-line-feir/#comment-141221</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I posted on Wednesday, I do expect a lawsuit to be filed and that it eventually achieve little of what the opponents want. A similar type suit against the Orange Line delayed the project as some environmental documents were redrafted but the NIMBYs finally accepted a settlement basically for their legal costs being covered by Metro. We&#8217;ll see if a suit even progresses beyond the initial first hearing&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/03/expect-plenty-of-debate-before-tomorrows-vote-on-the-expo-line-feir/#comment-141221" rel="nofollow">http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/03/expect-plenty-of-debate-before-tomorrows-vote-on-the-expo-line-feir/#comment-141221</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Burger</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/05/expo-board-approves-feir-for-phase-ii-off-to-construction-or-off-to-court/comment-page-1/#comment-144361</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Burger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=31541#comment-144361</guid>
		<description>Typo: Ridley-Thomas needed a surrogate to do son
Should read: Ridley-Thomas needed a surrogate to do so</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typo: Ridley-Thomas needed a surrogate to do son<br />
Should read: Ridley-Thomas needed a surrogate to do so</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.283 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-06 07:26:49 -->

