Activists Respond to DASH Cuts and Hikes. LADOT Schedules Public Hearings

As the Los Angeles Department of Transportation prepares for five public hearings next month and in early March, activists are responding to their proposed series of cuts and fare hikes that will close the city’s budget hole…at least when it comes to it’s transit services.  Unlike the reaction we saw two years ago when Metro outlined a series of major cuts to its bus service, transit advocacy groups are not nearly as unified in opposing these cuts as they were two years ago.  For more information on LADOT’s public outreach and other options to submit testimony, read the LADOT press release, available on Streetsblog here.

Each of the three major groups in Los Angeles, Southern California Transit Advocates, the Transit Coalition and the Bus Rider’s Union each take a different approach.

Kymberleigh Richards’ statement on behalf of the Southern California Transit Advocates crystallizes the difference in how advocates view the LADOT’s bus service as compared to Metro.  Remember that two years ago, Richards was one of the leaders opposing Metro’s proposed cuts, even threatening the Metro Board with retaliation if they went through with their plans:

So.CA.TA is okay with a lot of this.  The three Commuter Express
lines proposed for cancellation have very low ridership and displaced
passengers still have options.  On the lines proposed for
modifications, we believe 422 and 423 should continue to Thousand Oaks
Transit Center (a hub location) and that late night service on 142 should
continue at less frequency…

…We’re also okay with the proposed fare increases. although we think DASH
fares should go directly to 50 cents (no interim step) as it has been
unrealistically low as a quarter for far too long.  We do think the
interagency transfer (IAT) should be part of DASH’s fare structure,
though, especially to facilitate transferring to Metro where a DASH line
has been canceled or realigned to avoid route duplication.  It may
well be that adding the IAT will be a condition of LADOT becoming an
"eligible operator" for county sales tax subsidies anyway, so
we think they should just go ahead and do it.

Fellow So.CA.TA. executive Dana Gabbard also pointed to the need to cut waste in the DASH system.

Overall my impression is DASH is using the budget crisis as leverage to
address some long overdue issues regarding glaringly poorly performing
services that politics made it impossible to touch heretofore. Can you
think of any other transit service where the timetables list the names
of the Mayor AND every council members whose district the route goes
through? Plus every council member seems to have a pet new route that
they constantly call for implementation even though LADOT has been
tapped out of funding to do additional service for some years now, and
has warned before of impending deficits and a need to trim what it
already runs.

Speaking for the Transit Coalition, executive director Bart Reed takes the middle ground between support and opposition and offers a third way.  While not rejecting the idea that DASH needs some major changes to its operating structure, Reed offers the media-friendly line that the answer "is not the slash DASH!."  He also pointed to the excellent series of articles on restructuring at Metro Rider written by our friend Wad, aka LA Wad, aka HercWad.  Using Open Source data, Wad constructs his own, improved, DASH Service for Central L.A., the San Fernando Valley, and the East and Northeast.

While they haven’t responded to my email requests for comment, staff for the Bus Rider’s Union has made clear in previous conversations the disdain they hold for cutting bus service while expanding other city services such as the LAPD.  Organizers have vowed to educate their members about the cuts and I expect a more public showing from them in the leadup to the hearings.

  • Ed Greenberg

    I notice nobody has mentioned the proposed 50% cut in benefit to disabled Citiride users. Where previously, a $15 payment brought $84 in benefit per quarter, the amount has been cut in half to $42. This is a pretty big cut for some of our most vulnerable citizens.

  • Mr. Greenberg, the acivists for disabled users who most likely would want to organize in re the Citiride proposal is Lilibeth Navarro at Communities Actively Living Independent & Free:

    http://www.calif-ilc.org/

    Just remember funds are tight and taking a stance of no cuts will probably be a non-starter.

  • Anyone know the process for determining bus routes? Is it demand? Political will? Community input? Most likely a combination of factors, but if someone could direct me towards how, for example, DOT determined to cut the lines it has plans to in the above case, I’d appreciate it.

    As I was riding the red line home today, I was stunned at the crowds standing in the rain waiting for buses all around Broadway and 6th in contrast to the massive, nearly empty underground Red Line station…how is it we can build palatial multi-layer rail stops but we can’t build the most simple bus shelters?

    Finally, any links to info on transit pricing based on distance traveled, especially how such a system might be implemented at the street level?

  • “Anyone know the process for determining bus routes?”

    A wizard does it.

    Bus routes are not being cut because demand has dropped. They are being cut due to financial hardship. When you cut multiple lines and slash service on surviving routes all at once, there’s little science to it. It’s all about survival now.

    “how is it we can build palatial multi-layer rail stops but we can’t build the most simple bus shelters?”

    Rain is not a major problem in Los Angeles save for the big storms that happen once every year or two. Bus shelters with too much shelter become less bus shelter and more homeless shelter.

  • In the mid-decade a Community DASH Need Assessment Study was undertaken and likely provided a lot of the data used to determine what changes to propose.

    http://transit-insider.org/ladot/index.htm

    And as I was quoted, LADOT has known for years what lines haven’t been doing well but until now the politics meant cuts were fairly verboten. While the process is being driven by financial hardship, as Spokker noted, it is being done based on actual use and is fairly logical.

    Spokker is also right in re downtown L.A. and bus shelters becoming homeless encampments which is why they are scarce there.

    “transit pricing based on distance traveled…” TAP (and the gates) are supposed to facilitate that. Metro Board member JohnFasana of Duarte has been esepcially eager to explore this idea. Expect it to be a topic later this year as Metro will again examine its fare structure and route system.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Thanks Gov., Even with Prop A City Facing Long-Term Transit Cuts

|
Photo: Divwerf/Flickr It may be 16 months away, but thanks in large part to the Governor’s and legislature’s complete victory over transit riders when they re-worked the budget and completely eliminated the transit operating deficit back in February; either fare hikes or service cuts or both are coming to the City of Los Angeles’ transit […]

Feedback from DASH Hearings: Cuts Bad, Hikes Reasonable

|
Photo: Fred Camino/Flickr Tonight is the last of the five hearings on the major service changes that have been proposed for LADOT’s transit services, DASH, Commuter Express, City Ride and Charter Bus Service.  The first four hearings have seen crowds of various sizes, with packed house’s at the hearings in the San Fernando Valley’s hearing […]

Today’s Headlines

|
Northeast L.A. Getting the City’s First Bike Friendly Business District (LADOT Bike Blog, Curbed) Coincidence? NELA Police District Conducting Dangerous Driving Sting (Eastsider) Want to Beat Car Traffic? Ride a Bike Train (Voice of America) Plenty of 911 Calls on Woman Driving Wrong Way Before She Crashed and Killed (LAT) LAUSD Requested Traffic Guard At […]

LADOT Seeking Input on Plan to Offer Discount to TAP Users

|
Are reduced fares on the way for users of LADOT’s TAP on DASH bus service? The LADOT recently held public hearings seeking comments on proposed new Electronic Payment Incentive Fares along with sharing new Disparate Impact and Disproportionate Burden Fare Policies that it says “are supportive of the incentive fares, and also establish criteria for how […]