House and Senate Agree on $2.5B for High-Speed Rail — And More

(Editor’s Note: At the end of Elana’s article, I’m attaching a statement by CALPIRG declaring partial victory)

After lengthy negotiations, the House and Senate agreed last night on a massive "omnibus" spending bill [PDF]
that includes $2.5 billion for high-speed rail — a compromise between
the two chambers — as well as $150 million for the Obama
administration’s sustainable communities effort and $150 million for the Washington D.C. Metro system.

Olver_signs.jpgRep. John Olver (D-MA), chairman of the House appropriations panel for transportation (Photo: MA Power Shift)

The final legislation omits the $5 billion the White House had sought for its proposed
National Infrastructure Bank, with Appropriations Committee members
noting in a statement that "due to the complexity of this proposal, it
should be considered through the regular authorization process."

In addition, the new bill resolves a politically charged clash
over allowing guns on Amtrak trains by removing language that would
have threatened the rail network’s federal funding if it did not allow
firearms in checked baggage.

Instead, the House-Senate
agreement requires Amtrak to report to Congress within 180 days on a
weapons screening plan and to implement the policy within one year,
while consulting with the Department of Homeland Security. The bill
makes no mention of possible loss of federal aid.

The House
and Senate bills varied widely in their treatment of high-speed rail,
with the latter reserving $1.2 billion for bullet trains in 2010 while
the former upped the ante to $4 billion.

Transportation reform groups and local planners had lobbied hard for the higher number but appeared to consider $2.5 billion an acceptable midpoint.

"While
the
figure is still short of the full $4 billion recommended by the
House, it is a significant step in the right direction," Phineas
Baxandall, senior budget analyst at the U.S. Public Interest Research
Groups (PIRG), said in a statement. "It sends a
clear message to the country that high-speed rail is on the move."

The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) would receive $10.73 billion for 2010 under the new deal, more than the House-passed
level. Washington D.C.’s Metro, facing fare hikes after a June crash
that killed nine passengers, would receive $150 million for safety and
maintenance.

The $150 million for the administration’s
inter-agency sustainable communities plan matches the White House
request. The U.S. DOT also stands to receive $600 million for
competitive, merit-based grants in line with the popular TIGER stimulus program, which is being eyed for this winter’s coming jobs bill.

Finally, the new legislation also addresses the congressional investigation into Amtrak management’s stormy relationship with its inspector general.

Language
in the bill states that the U.S. DOT "shall not make grants for" Amtrak
operating in the third and fourth quarters of 2010 until a member of
the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
certifies that the rail network is collaborating successfully with its
watchdog.

Late Update: Transportation for America, which had joined U.S. PIRG in pressing for a $4 billion high-speed rail investment, released a statement hailing the agreement and its lead negotiator in the House. T4A co-chairman John Robert Smith said:

This $2.5 billion would not be possible without the efforts of
Congressman John Olver, a friend of public transportation throughout
his 18 years in Congress. We applaud Congressman Olver’s efforts and
look forward to our continued partnership.

CALPIRG Statement:

CALPIRG Applauds
Increased
Investment in High-Speed Rail

Statement by Erin Steva, Transportation
Advocate, on
the Consolidated Appropriation Committee’s Increased Allocation for
High-Speed
Rail

“This
week, CALPIRG joined labor, environmental, and academic advocates with
local
officials to call for greater investment in high-speed rail. We’re glad
to see
that Congress has responded.

“On
Tuesday the Consolidated
Appropriations Committee bill
included $2.5 billion for high-speed
rail for
fiscal year 2010, more than doubling President Barack Obama’s original
recommendation of $1 billion and the Senate’s original $1.2 billion
figure, but
still short of the $4 billion recommended by the House.

“While
the figure is still short of the full $4 billion recommended by the
House, it
is a significant step in the right direction. It sends a clear message
to the
country that high-speed rail is on the move.

“The
decision will create jobs in the short-term by spurring high-speed rail
investment and development near future stations. Over the longer term,
the
decision adds momentum to forge a 21st century
transportation system
with a robust network of high-speed rail that will connect metropolitan
areas,
boost national productivity, and reduce our dependence on oil.

“It’s
clear now that the Economic Recovery bill’s initial down payment for
high-speed
rail is being followed up by sustained commitment from Congress.”

Citizens
groups and transportation advocates around the country had rallied
together to
support the higher house figure on a national
website
and at local
events
.

  • Jamal

    Its a shame we couldn’t get the full $4B, but its still double what Obama originally asked for.

  • Mark W

    Timely, considering China today unveiled the world’s fastest train.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8406910.stm?ls

  • walker o

    wouldn’t it be better to use those billions on local light rail? Doesn’t HSR just encourage more dispersed metropolitan and extra-metropolitan development. Here in LA, this will make it realistic to live in central valley and commute to work. That will induce sprawl into the central valley which is california’s local food source.

  • I don’t have any problem if this increases development in the Central Valley or Lancaster/Palmdale where there is open space and room to grow.

    According to SCAG, we are likely to have three million more people expected to migrate here over the next three decades. They will still have the first/last mile issue to/from rail and that will increase demand for quality local transit for all of us.

  • Walker, while I am not worried about High Speed Rail enabling the car culture, I do think the debate over which type of rail construction is a higher priority — Federal/State High Speed Rail or Regional/Local light/heavy/commuter rail — will continue.

  • Mark –

    Clicking on that link is just downright depressing.

    And $2.5B for high speed rail?

    $5B for a *national* infrastructure bank?

    Is this some kind of a joke. What do we get to build a few residential roads with that crap. We could use $5B in South L.A. ALONE!!!

    How about we provide for municipalities and state transport agencies the same low rates that we’re giving the investor class (0%), backed by the full weight of the treasury?

    This country is so royally screwed.

  • welcome me sc

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

Senate Saves a Sliver For High-Speed Rail

|
President Obama had sought $8 billion for high-speed rail in 2012. The House-passed budget had exactly zero. The Senate bill approved by the Transportation subcommittee Tuesday followed suit. But the full Appropriations Committee yesterday put $100 million back into next year’s budget for the president’s signature transportation initiative. That’s still starvation wages for the program, […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Senate Offers a More Multi-Modal 2014 Transportation Budget Than House

|
Last week, a House panel envisioned some big cuts to next year’s transportation budget. TIGER and high-speed rail would get nothing, Amtrak would get slashed, and ixnay on all that green “livability” crap. (And that’s practically a quote.) The Senate Appropriations Committee voted this morning on the budget its own transportation subcommittee put together, and the end […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Senate Strips High-Speed Rail Funding

|
The Senate’s transportation budget proposal is still under wraps, but we’re getting some clues about what’s in it. This morning, a subcommittee marked up the transportation and HUD appropriations bill, and the full committee will consider it tomorrow afternoon. Only after that will the draft bill be released. During this morning’s subcommittee markup, though, a […]
STREETSBLOG USA

How Will the House Answer the Senate’s Transportation Funding Bill?

|
The full Senate passed a major appropriations bill yesterday, including funding levels for transportation and housing. The Senate put the kibosh on Sen. Rand Paul’s attempt to strip bike/ped funding from the federal transportation program, as we reported yesterday. Here’s the lowdown on the bill as a whole. The upper chamber maintained funding for several key livability programs, teeing up a […]