<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Will It Take for Caltrans to Decide to &#8220;Fix-It-First?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/what-will-it-take-for-caltrans-to-decide-to-fix-it-first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/what-will-it-take-for-caltrans-to-decide-to-fix-it-first/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Chow</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/what-will-it-take-for-caltrans-to-decide-to-fix-it-first/comment-page-1/#comment-62791</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=22121#comment-62791</guid>
		<description>Well maintained roads are essential to safety and improve ride quality for bus riders.

I would like to see what could be done to soften the economic impacts on transit agencies, especially on operating costs. I would like to see increased funding to maintain operations, and deny highway funding to cities that are cutting transit service but want more money for highways (OCTA is one of those).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well maintained roads are essential to safety and improve ride quality for bus riders.</p>
<p>I would like to see what could be done to soften the economic impacts on transit agencies, especially on operating costs. I would like to see increased funding to maintain operations, and deny highway funding to cities that are cutting transit service but want more money for highways (OCTA is one of those).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Parvo</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/what-will-it-take-for-caltrans-to-decide-to-fix-it-first/comment-page-1/#comment-53751</link>
		<dc:creator>David Parvo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=22121#comment-53751</guid>
		<description>What I find unbelievable is that folks think we should continue building more and more roadways rather than funding such things as lightrail when this country can&#039;t even afford to maintain the roads it already has.

Our infrastructure is quite literally falling apart, which means that among other things freight (one main component in the recent spike in freight costs is the increasing need to maintain eighteen wheelers or VMT upticks due to such things as dilapidated bridge closings) will no longer be able to move in its current manner. Nor will people. Furthermore, most of our foodstuffs are imported as are most other goods, and our whole global system of economic growth is predicated upon GDP (Simon Kuznets: &quot;The welfare of a nation can scarcely be inferred from a measure of national income&quot; ) and subsidized-so-it-can-be-cheap consumption of energy. The global production of oil has nearly reached its peak point (some illustrious thinking folk well-connected in the biz argue that it already has in Saudi Arabia), which is going to have extreme ramifications, one of the effects obviously being our society becoming much less global and much more local in nature.

It&#039;s a shame, how those towns beyond a fifty mile proximity to Interstates have been allowed to die (i.e. America’s Heartland). It&#039;s a shame, how both our domestic agricultural and industrial capacity has been so extensively desiccated via outsourcing. And it&#039;s a shame, how our intraurban and Interstate Rail System was destroyed, an act that among others General Motors and Standard Oil were convicted for conspiring against the public&#039;s welfare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find unbelievable is that folks think we should continue building more and more roadways rather than funding such things as lightrail when this country can&#8217;t even afford to maintain the roads it already has.</p>
<p>Our infrastructure is quite literally falling apart, which means that among other things freight (one main component in the recent spike in freight costs is the increasing need to maintain eighteen wheelers or VMT upticks due to such things as dilapidated bridge closings) will no longer be able to move in its current manner. Nor will people. Furthermore, most of our foodstuffs are imported as are most other goods, and our whole global system of economic growth is predicated upon GDP (Simon Kuznets: &#8220;The welfare of a nation can scarcely be inferred from a measure of national income&#8221; ) and subsidized-so-it-can-be-cheap consumption of energy. The global production of oil has nearly reached its peak point (some illustrious thinking folk well-connected in the biz argue that it already has in Saudi Arabia), which is going to have extreme ramifications, one of the effects obviously being our society becoming much less global and much more local in nature.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame, how those towns beyond a fifty mile proximity to Interstates have been allowed to die (i.e. America’s Heartland). It&#8217;s a shame, how both our domestic agricultural and industrial capacity has been so extensively desiccated via outsourcing. And it&#8217;s a shame, how our intraurban and Interstate Rail System was destroyed, an act that among others General Motors and Standard Oil were convicted for conspiring against the public&#8217;s welfare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calwatch</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/what-will-it-take-for-caltrans-to-decide-to-fix-it-first/comment-page-1/#comment-51691</link>
		<dc:creator>calwatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=22121#comment-51691</guid>
		<description>Aggressive maintenance is necessary, but it&#039;s not as sexy as opening another carpool lane that is useless to transit riders and single occupancy drivers. The gas tax absolutely needs to go up, but that is political suicide. Instead we get bright ideas like using money returned from TARP loans to banks to juice up the highway bill with more projects (as reported by the OCTA board chairman at yesterday&#039;s OCTA board meeting). 

Then again, with trillion dollar deficits on the federal level, what&#039;s another $100 billion or so on keeping our roads functional and our bridges safe? Better than going into Wall Street bonuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aggressive maintenance is necessary, but it&#8217;s not as sexy as opening another carpool lane that is useless to transit riders and single occupancy drivers. The gas tax absolutely needs to go up, but that is political suicide. Instead we get bright ideas like using money returned from TARP loans to banks to juice up the highway bill with more projects (as reported by the OCTA board chairman at yesterday&#8217;s OCTA board meeting). </p>
<p>Then again, with trillion dollar deficits on the federal level, what&#8217;s another $100 billion or so on keeping our roads functional and our bridges safe? Better than going into Wall Street bonuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bikinginla</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/what-will-it-take-for-caltrans-to-decide-to-fix-it-first/comment-page-1/#comment-51641</link>
		<dc:creator>bikinginla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=22121#comment-51641</guid>
		<description>When I moved to California in the late &#039;80s, I thought this was the only state I&#039;d ever seen where the roads were worse than in Louisiana. And they&#039;ve only deteriorated further in the years since.

On the other hand, maybe it&#039;s all just a clever ploy to get more people to walk, bike and use mass transit. After all, once the streets are impassible, people won&#039;t have any other choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I moved to California in the late &#8217;80s, I thought this was the only state I&#8217;d ever seen where the roads were worse than in Louisiana. And they&#8217;ve only deteriorated further in the years since.</p>
<p>On the other hand, maybe it&#8217;s all just a clever ploy to get more people to walk, bike and use mass transit. After all, once the streets are impassible, people won&#8217;t have any other choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clutch J</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/what-will-it-take-for-caltrans-to-decide-to-fix-it-first/comment-page-1/#comment-51581</link>
		<dc:creator>Clutch J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=22121#comment-51581</guid>
		<description>Fix-it-first is a wonderful umbrella for complete streets.  The argument is that existing roads need to be brought up to a state of good repair for all users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fix-it-first is a wonderful umbrella for complete streets.  The argument is that existing roads need to be brought up to a state of good repair for all users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/what-will-it-take-for-caltrans-to-decide-to-fix-it-first/comment-page-1/#comment-51461</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=22121#comment-51461</guid>
		<description>To be fair, CalTrans doesn&#039;t maintain all roads. A lot of them fall under local city agencies&#039; responsibilities.

But our cities are just as guilty of neglecting the roads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, CalTrans doesn&#8217;t maintain all roads. A lot of them fall under local city agencies&#8217; responsibilities.</p>
<p>But our cities are just as guilty of neglecting the roads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Gabbard</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/what-will-it-take-for-caltrans-to-decide-to-fix-it-first/comment-page-1/#comment-51381</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Gabbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=22121#comment-51381</guid>
		<description>State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) has been woefully underfunded for years. You read the annual reports by the California Transportation Commission and they document this sad state of affairs. And yet the policymakers continue to stall at finding a way to get our roads toward any reasonable timeline to be returned to a state of good repair.

Neglecting pavement maintenance is a bad idea as eventually repair costs skyrocket beyond a certain point. I&#039;ve compiled a resource page on the SO.CA.TA website on this topic: http://socata.net/26.html

People rail about the evils of taxes. Isn&#039;t your car or bike being damaged by potholes a tax when you have to shell out money to fix the damage? It is so shortsighted to underfund this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) has been woefully underfunded for years. You read the annual reports by the California Transportation Commission and they document this sad state of affairs. And yet the policymakers continue to stall at finding a way to get our roads toward any reasonable timeline to be returned to a state of good repair.</p>
<p>Neglecting pavement maintenance is a bad idea as eventually repair costs skyrocket beyond a certain point. I&#8217;ve compiled a resource page on the SO.CA.TA website on this topic: <a href="http://socata.net/26.html" rel="nofollow">http://socata.net/26.html</a></p>
<p>People rail about the evils of taxes. Isn&#8217;t your car or bike being damaged by potholes a tax when you have to shell out money to fix the damage? It is so shortsighted to underfund this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

