<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Superfund, Fault Lines, Groundwater All in the Way&#8230;Let&#8217;s Dig a Tunnel!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/18/superfund-fault-lines-groundwater-all-in-the-way-lets-dig-a-tunnel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/18/superfund-fault-lines-groundwater-all-in-the-way-lets-dig-a-tunnel/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Villani</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/18/superfund-fault-lines-groundwater-all-in-the-way-lets-dig-a-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-50651</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Villani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21211#comment-50651</guid>
		<description>Build it. I&#039;m a big mass transit supporter, too, but this isn&#039;t like other freeway expansion projects. This completes a gap that&#039;s caused problems for more than four decades. It&#039;s not a matter of &quot;golly, this freeway&#039;s crowded; let&#039;s make it bigger.&quot; It&#039;s a matter of improving connectivity and diverting traffic away from surface streets and downtown L.A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Build it. I&#8217;m a big mass transit supporter, too, but this isn&#8217;t like other freeway expansion projects. This completes a gap that&#8217;s caused problems for more than four decades. It&#8217;s not a matter of &#8220;golly, this freeway&#8217;s crowded; let&#8217;s make it bigger.&#8221; It&#8217;s a matter of improving connectivity and diverting traffic away from surface streets and downtown L.A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: limit</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/18/superfund-fault-lines-groundwater-all-in-the-way-lets-dig-a-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-50611</link>
		<dc:creator>limit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21211#comment-50611</guid>
		<description>Multi modal  solutions are key. However, I would also like to see additional options such as a cut and cover middle ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multi modal  solutions are key. However, I would also like to see additional options such as a cut and cover middle ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John F. Conroy</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/18/superfund-fault-lines-groundwater-all-in-the-way-lets-dig-a-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-50291</link>
		<dc:creator>John F. Conroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21211#comment-50291</guid>
		<description>Build a &quot;flyover&quot; like the Harbor Freeway downtown. Two lanes each way, and leave room for a Gold line connection. NO on or off ramps in South Pasadena. Over 30 years of NIMBY-ism is quite enough, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Build a &#8220;flyover&#8221; like the Harbor Freeway downtown. Two lanes each way, and leave room for a Gold line connection. NO on or off ramps in South Pasadena. Over 30 years of NIMBY-ism is quite enough, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spokker</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/18/superfund-fault-lines-groundwater-all-in-the-way-lets-dig-a-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-50271</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21211#comment-50271</guid>
		<description>There are better ways to opposing the 710 project than resorting to fear tactics. We don&#039;t like it when it&#039;s done to transit projects, so we shouldn&#039;t do it to freeway projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are better ways to opposing the 710 project than resorting to fear tactics. We don&#8217;t like it when it&#8217;s done to transit projects, so we shouldn&#8217;t do it to freeway projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/18/superfund-fault-lines-groundwater-all-in-the-way-lets-dig-a-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-50241</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21211#comment-50241</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true. Scare tactics delayed the Wilshire Subway a couple of decades and here we go again, deja vu, with this blog post.  Some things never change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true. Scare tactics delayed the Wilshire Subway a couple of decades and here we go again, deja vu, with this blog post.  Some things never change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Angeleno</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/18/superfund-fault-lines-groundwater-all-in-the-way-lets-dig-a-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-50221</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Angeleno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21211#comment-50221</guid>
		<description>This &quot;No We Can&#039;t&quot; attitude emerges only when a proposal offers to move cars more efficiently. I have yet to see any rational opposition to the 710 tunnel. Note the same people fighting the 710 tunnel support tunneling twice as many miles under Wilshire for a subway -- I support that too, by the way... we need a comprehensive approach: mass transit AND more freeway capacity to meet future demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8220;No We Can&#8217;t&#8221; attitude emerges only when a proposal offers to move cars more efficiently. I have yet to see any rational opposition to the 710 tunnel. Note the same people fighting the 710 tunnel support tunneling twice as many miles under Wilshire for a subway &#8212; I support that too, by the way&#8230; we need a comprehensive approach: mass transit AND more freeway capacity to meet future demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Morales</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/18/superfund-fault-lines-groundwater-all-in-the-way-lets-dig-a-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-50161</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Morales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21211#comment-50161</guid>
		<description>Watch KABCTV Channel 7 tongiht at 5:30pm &amp; at 11pm
They may be reporting on this subject!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch KABCTV Channel 7 tongiht at 5:30pm &amp; at 11pm<br />
They may be reporting on this subject!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/18/superfund-fault-lines-groundwater-all-in-the-way-lets-dig-a-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-50041</link>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21211#comment-50041</guid>
		<description>Really, they should just make an alternative that ends this around Huntington Drive.  A lot of the congestion in the area would vanish if they did so.  No use wasting the money to connect the 710 all the way to the 210, when the same benefits could be obtained by connecting to a more suitable road for the volumes on that freeway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, they should just make an alternative that ends this around Huntington Drive.  A lot of the congestion in the area would vanish if they did so.  No use wasting the money to connect the 710 all the way to the 210, when the same benefits could be obtained by connecting to a more suitable road for the volumes on that freeway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/11/18/superfund-fault-lines-groundwater-all-in-the-way-lets-dig-a-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-50001</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=21211#comment-50001</guid>
		<description>The expense and challenge of building a tunnel is exactly why the I-710 gap closure should be built as a surface freeway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The expense and challenge of building a tunnel is exactly why the I-710 gap closure should be built as a surface freeway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

