Unanimous BAC Votes for More Time to Review Draft Bike Plan

10_7_09_bwc.jpgThe Bike Writer’s Collective huddles at last night’s B.A.C Meeting. Photo: Stephen Box/Facebook

It may have been a few months late, but last night’s review of the proposed new bike plan by the Bicycle Advisory Committee had enough fireworks for the fourth of July.

From BAC Chair Glenn Bailey to a small, but passionate group of audience members, a number of people expressed their anger about the plan – particularly about the short amount of time allowed for public review.

As a result, the committee voted to request an extension of the comment period to January 8, 2010, rather than the current deadline of November 6 of this year. The unanimous vote reflected unusual agreement between committee members who voiced support for the plan and those who expressed problems with significant parts of it.

However, all agreed that after the seemingly endless delays in releasing the plan, the public deserved more time to review the 212 page document. As Stephen Box put it, noting that L.A. allows more time to review new sanitation plans, it makes it appear that in the city’s eyes, "Cyclists rate below trash."

While they said it might be possible to extend the deadline, none of the representatives of DOT in attendance claimed the authority to do so, nor did they explain the process required to get an extension.

A brief introduction to a very complex plan

The affable Jordann Turner from the Dept. of City Planning lead the council through a brief overview of the proposed bike plan, intended to replace the original 1996 bike plan that was reauthorized by the council in 2007 to remain eligible for federal funding.

As Turner noted, the goal of the plan is to create a continuous bicycle system that extends throughout the city, with a system of collector routes that would leave no resident more than a mile from the network. The plan also creates a technical design handbook that would provide design guidance for all bicycle types and roadway situations, and form a template for city agencies to follow.

He also touched on the conflicts inherent in off-road cycling within the city, as various groups, including cyclists, hikers and equestrians battle for limited trail space. Turner said the city had brought in a professional negotiator to try to develop recommendations that would accommodate all users.

In addition, the plan attempts to prioritize projects so they can be identified and move forward quickly as funding becomes available. And it was suggested that it’s not difficult process to amend the plan, so if anyone thinks something was missed, they should offer suggestions on how it can be changed.

There was also talk that one more workshop may be scheduled for East L.A., though no details were available.

A mixed reaction from the committee

While a handful of committee members expressed satisfaction with the plan – and one member even suggested cyclists should be grateful for "what they have now" – several of the panel members expressed serious concerns.

Brad House, representing the 15th Council District, asked why the Cyclist’s Bill of Rights wasn’t included in the bike plan. Michele Mowery, Senior Bicycle Coordinator for LADOT, said that portions of the CBOR that the city has jurisdiction over were incorporated into the plan, while some parts that the city doesn’t have jurisdiction over were left out.

That lead much eye rolling in the audience, particularly from Box, who later expressed amazement that any part of it would be "outside the city’s jurisdiction," and questioned just what those parts could be.

Thirteenth District representative Joe Linton voiced his frustration that the current plan included 50 fewer miles of bikeways than the plan adopted 13 years earlier. "That seems like a retreat from the ’96 plan, which was already a little whimpy." And he complained that streets that had formerly been listed as "designated" for bike lanes were now considered merely "proposed."

The real fireworks came from Chair Person Glenn Bailey, who showed visible anger as he complained about the short window for comments, noting that only a 6-day period was allotted for all four scheduled workshops. He went on to suggest that every Neighborhood Council in the city should receive the same bike plan CD that had been provided to the committee. "What would that cost? Twenty-five cents times 89? Let’s get it out there."

And he drew a round of applause from the audience for insisting that the bike plan should have the rule of law if it’s adopted by the council.

Police HQ bike parking, and other matters

While the bike plan took up most of the evening’s discussion, more sparks flew when a motion was made to hold the next meeting at Deaton Auditorium in the new police headquarters downtown.

Box complained about inadequate bicycle parking at the new building, pointing out that the street level parking was at the far edge of the facility, behind nine planters and completely out of view from any watchful eyes. His wife Enci pointed out that no woman would feel comfortable leaving her bike there, especially after dark.

Bailey explained out that additional bike parking was included in the plans for the parking garage; however, he was not allowed access when he attempted to examine it. A motion was finally passed to hold the next meeting at Deaton, but to request that LAPD provide safe and secure bike parking prior to the meeting; Bailey also suggested that riders be allowed to bring their bikes inside the auditorium.

Other matters included requesting that space for bikes be maintained on Westwood Blvd during and after construction of the Expo line, and that bikes be accommodated in any redesign of Pico and Olympic Boulevards.

Tuesday night also marked the first meeting for Ramona Marks, the panel’s newest member, and currently, the only woman on the panel, representing District 1. Marks is the current membership coordinator for the Friends of the Los Angeles River and has served as Treasurer for the Bicycle Kitchen.

4 thoughts on Unanimous BAC Votes for More Time to Review Draft Bike Plan

  1. Damn, I arrived right when it was all concluding (approximately on time!). I got a fun tour of the inadequacies of the LAPD HQ’s bike parking problems after the meeting:

  2. i’m curious as to why bike parking at lapd hq is such a hot button issue. do people really plan on making lots of bike trips there? or is it the issue of a city building, not providing adequate bicycling facilities in general?

    cause if its the former i don’t get it, the latter, i do.

  3. Immediately after reading Ted’s observation that “Enci pointed out that no woman would feel comfortable leaving her bike [outside the new LAPD headquarters], especially after dark” and “Ramona Marks, the panel’s newest member [is] currently, the only woman on the panel” a fellow rider sent me an article from Scientific American entitled, “How to Get More Bicyclists on the Road, To boost urban bicycling, figure out what women want” (http://tinyurl.com/kpmzdt)

    It is a must read — hopefully one of LA’s great bike bloggers will pick up on it. The article opened my eyes, although it states the obvious. (Some brief quotes below.) I will try to be even more sensitive to the women’s point of view whether hear it on the BAC (Ramona Marks) or from BAC speakers or I read it in a blog (e.g., Bike Girl LA, Green LA Girl, Enci’s post “A Woman’s Comfort on Our Streets” on this site).

    I did not read that the Draft Bike Plan considered women in particular. It should.

    Now some quotes from the Scientific American:

    An emerging body of research suggests that a superior strategy to increase pedal pushing could be had by asking the perennial question: What do women want?

    “Despite our hope that gender roles don’t exist, they still do,” says Jennifer Dill, a transportation and planning researcher at Portland State University. Addressing women’s concerns about safety and utility “will go a long way” toward increasing the number of people on two wheels, Dill explains.

    So far few cities have taken on the challenge. In the U.S., most cycling facilities consist of on-street bike lanes, which require riding in vehicle-clogged traffic, notes John Pucher, a professor of urban planning at Rutgers University and longtime bike scholar. And when cities do install traffic-protected off-street bike paths, they are almost always along rivers and parks rather than along routes leading “to the supermarket, the school, the day care center,” Pucher says.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Streets Notes for the Upcoming Bike Plan Meetings

|
I’ll be going to the Westside Meeting.  If anyone wants to write about the other ones, let me know. Starting on Thursday, the City of Los Angeles will hold the first of five "official" public meetings on the Draft Bike Plan that was released for public viewing after some draft maps were released earlier this […]

Less Anger, More Posterboard at 2009 Bike Plan Meeting

|
There was no power point presentation. Instead LADOT, City Planning and Alta Planning just made mini-presentations in front of a series of poster board. The balloons were not related to the presentation. For more images, visit the Streetsblog Flickr page. The first thing I noticed when I arrived at last night’s Bike Plan meeting for […]

A Broad Section of Cyclists Descend on City Hall, LAPD No-Shows

|
Post meeting, the Ridazz headed over to check out the Lakers Outgoing Transportation Committee Chair Wendy Greuel held what was supposed to be her swan song to the bicycling community at an almost-all-bikes Transportation Committee meeting earlier today.  It’s true, there were some low points, such as only Councilman Bill Rosendahl joining Greuel on the […]

Cyclists Unhappy with LADOT’s Public Process

|
A growing chorus is building in the cycling/activist community that the LADOT’s public outreach for its Bike Master Plan is insufficient, and perhaps the harbringer of a bad plan. Stephen Box, of the Bike Writer’s Collective, Illuminate LA, and Soapbox LA wrote an article today for LAist comparing LADOT’s outreach plans with those in Portland […]

Monrovia City Council Unanimously Approves New Bicycle Master Plan

|
On a unanimous 5-0 vote last night, the Monrovia City Council approved the city’s new bicycle master plan. Monrovia’s bicycle plan was developed in consultation with Alta Planning + Design. The plan calls for 3.7 miles of bike paths (along the Sawpit and Santa Anita Washes), 5.1 miles of bike lanes, 17.9 miles of sharrowed bike routes, […]