<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Council Approves Moving Forward With Wilshire Bus Lanes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/09/22/council-approves-moving-forward-with-wilshire-bus-lanes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/09/22/council-approves-moving-forward-with-wilshire-bus-lanes/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Linton</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/09/22/council-approves-moving-forward-with-wilshire-bus-lanes/comment-page-1/#comment-38851</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Linton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=12281#comment-38851</guid>
		<description>I attended one of the public outreach meetings today. The slide show presentation is already on-line here:
http://www.metro.net/projects_studies/wilshire/images/WilshireBRT_Presentation_10-5-09.pdf

The most interesting thing was the alternatives which are on page 12 of the slide show link above. There&#039;re a couple where they would leave out small bits of the project (from Parkview to Valencia 0.7 miles at east end of project, and/or from Sepulveda to Veteran 0.3 miles at the 405 Freeway.)

The interesting alternative that I really like is that they would leave the jut-outs in the Comstock Hills area, and would use the money saved to do additional repaving. This would allow repaving on nearly the entire eastern section of Wilshire - from Beverly Hills (San Vicente) to MacArthur Park (Park View.) This alternative means no street widening in the &quot;condo canyon&quot; area - just using existing lanes. Much better in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attended one of the public outreach meetings today. The slide show presentation is already on-line here:<br />
<a href="http://www.metro.net/projects_studies/wilshire/images/WilshireBRT_Presentation_10-5-09.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.metro.net/projects_studies/wilshire/images/WilshireBRT_Presentation_10-5-09.pdf</a></p>
<p>The most interesting thing was the alternatives which are on page 12 of the slide show link above. There&#8217;re a couple where they would leave out small bits of the project (from Parkview to Valencia 0.7 miles at east end of project, and/or from Sepulveda to Veteran 0.3 miles at the 405 Freeway.)</p>
<p>The interesting alternative that I really like is that they would leave the jut-outs in the Comstock Hills area, and would use the money saved to do additional repaving. This would allow repaving on nearly the entire eastern section of Wilshire &#8211; from Beverly Hills (San Vicente) to MacArthur Park (Park View.) This alternative means no street widening in the &#8220;condo canyon&#8221; area &#8211; just using existing lanes. Much better in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik G.</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/09/22/council-approves-moving-forward-with-wilshire-bus-lanes/comment-page-1/#comment-34531</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=12281#comment-34531</guid>
		<description>Harold Katz has a response:

http://www.citywatchla.com/content/view/2732/75/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harold Katz has a response:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.citywatchla.com/content/view/2732/75/" rel="nofollow">http://www.citywatchla.com/content/view/2732/75/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik G.</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/09/22/council-approves-moving-forward-with-wilshire-bus-lanes/comment-page-1/#comment-34501</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=12281#comment-34501</guid>
		<description>Juan, 

What is the LADOT doing with all the maintenance money that should have been applied to Wilshire?  Save for a small portion around Wilton, I have seen no evidence of any repaving on Wilshire btween Vermont and the border with Santa Monica.  And yes I know where Wilshire passes through territory not IN the City of Los Angeles, such as Beverly Hills and the VA/Sodliers Home/Cemetary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Juan, </p>
<p>What is the LADOT doing with all the maintenance money that should have been applied to Wilshire?  Save for a small portion around Wilton, I have seen no evidence of any repaving on Wilshire btween Vermont and the border with Santa Monica.  And yes I know where Wilshire passes through territory not IN the City of Los Angeles, such as Beverly Hills and the VA/Sodliers Home/Cemetary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/09/22/council-approves-moving-forward-with-wilshire-bus-lanes/comment-page-1/#comment-33851</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=12281#comment-33851</guid>
		<description>Erik, I see you are an advocate of an increase in gasoline taxes to augment local transportation revenues.  Don&#039;t you think an increase in gasoline prices would make you more likely to take transit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erik, I see you are an advocate of an increase in gasoline taxes to augment local transportation revenues.  Don&#8217;t you think an increase in gasoline prices would make you more likely to take transit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik G.</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/09/22/council-approves-moving-forward-with-wilshire-bus-lanes/comment-page-1/#comment-33831</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=12281#comment-33831</guid>
		<description>Blah, blah, blah...

JUST PAVE THE DAMN ROAD!!!

I am tired of having those 8th grade shop projects from Hungary LA Metro calls &quot;busses&quot; break another axle while I am enroute to work!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blah, blah, blah&#8230;</p>
<p>JUST PAVE THE DAMN ROAD!!!</p>
<p>I am tired of having those 8th grade shop projects from Hungary LA Metro calls &#8220;busses&#8221; break another axle while I am enroute to work!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.418 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 10:55:00 -->

