<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portland Gets a Cycle Track, and All That Comes With It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/portland-gets-a-cycle-track-and-all-that-comes-with-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/portland-gets-a-cycle-track-and-all-that-comes-with-it/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Columbusite</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/portland-gets-a-cycle-track-and-all-that-comes-with-it/comment-page-1/#comment-29481</link>
		<dc:creator>Columbusite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=9641#comment-29481</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a bad idea because it&#039;s a failed attempt to provide a segregated infrastructure for bikes. Cyclists need to look at what segregated bike infrastructure does and says to cyclists. On the surface it appears to be a welcoming gesture, but in reality endangers cyclists at the expense of appeasing motorists. Look at the picture above and take into consideration drivers taking a right turn at the green light. With all those parked cars keeping cyclists out of view, drivers really won&#039;t see a cyclist before they hit one. Forget cycle tracks and bike lanes in the city. Keep everyone driving/riding in the same, easy-to-understand way instead of creating conflicts which pit a human body against thousands of pounds of metal. Maybe that doesn&#039;t attract as high of a number of new cyclists, but safety of cyclists should come first instead of using them as statistics for bragging purposes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a bad idea because it&#8217;s a failed attempt to provide a segregated infrastructure for bikes. Cyclists need to look at what segregated bike infrastructure does and says to cyclists. On the surface it appears to be a welcoming gesture, but in reality endangers cyclists at the expense of appeasing motorists. Look at the picture above and take into consideration drivers taking a right turn at the green light. With all those parked cars keeping cyclists out of view, drivers really won&#8217;t see a cyclist before they hit one. Forget cycle tracks and bike lanes in the city. Keep everyone driving/riding in the same, easy-to-understand way instead of creating conflicts which pit a human body against thousands of pounds of metal. Maybe that doesn&#8217;t attract as high of a number of new cyclists, but safety of cyclists should come first instead of using them as statistics for bragging purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spokker</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/portland-gets-a-cycle-track-and-all-that-comes-with-it/comment-page-1/#comment-29011</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=9641#comment-29011</guid>
		<description>&quot;Are cycle tracks worth the backlash they sometimes inspire?&quot;

Since when was anyone around here afraid of backlash? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Are cycle tracks worth the backlash they sometimes inspire?&#8221;</p>
<p>Since when was anyone around here afraid of backlash? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

