Portland Gets a Cycle Track, and All That Comes With It

In Portland, Oregon, already one of America’s best cycling cities, a
new amenity was unveiled this past weekend: a cycle track, or
physically separated bike lane, near Portland State University. For
several blocks, it provides a protected place for bikers to ride — by
taking a lane from motor vehicle traffic and changing the place where
cars are supposed to park.

But as Bike Portland‘s
Jonathan Maus notes in a post on the unveiling ceremony, negative
feedback is threatening to drown out positive reaction. It’s a scenario all too familiar to New Yorkers:

cycletrack_big.jpgPortland’s new (and first-ever) cycle track has been installed on SW Broadway near Portland State University. Photo © J. Maus.

[S]ome local TV reports…seem to want to turn this into the latest front in the battle of "cars vs. bikes." One report, by Anne Yeager on KGW-TV

seemed to actually encourage negative feedback when she said on their
6:00 newscast: "If you love the idea, that’s great — but if you don’t,
contact the mayor’s office."


On
other local media websites, the comments are flying in. The majority of
them that I’ve read are negative. There are all the usual concerns that
bikes are getting a free ride, that cars are being
relegated to the margins, that the city is going insane, and so on.

The Oregonian’s coverage led to so many thoughtfully negative comments that reporter Joe Rose decided to post another story on his Hard Drive blog to stick up for the project. Rose dusted off the old “Green Dividend” study
by Portland economist Joe Cortright (which shows that our region saves
$2.6 billion annually because we drive fewer miles on average).

Even here on BikePortland, several commenters are staunchly opposed to the project.

To
combat concerns and negative feedback, the City stresses that this is
nothing more than an "experiment." I wonder though, what would happen
if they heard more negative than positive feedback on their experiment?
Is the City losing the PR battle on this one?

So
what do you think? Are cycle tracks worth the backlash they sometimes
inspire? Will they ever become common enough — as they are in many
European cities — that they will be widely accepted, and respected, by
users of all different modes? Or are you one of the people who opposes
physically segregated bicycle facilities altogether?

More coverage of the cycle track can be found at Portland Transport,
which hails it as the harbinger of "the second era of Portland
bicycling infrastructure." Lots of interesting comments there as well.

A related post from the Streetsblog Network today: the FABB Blog
links to a report that says local governments should do a better job of
providing bicycle infrastructure to help prevent childhood obesity.

  • “Are cycle tracks worth the backlash they sometimes inspire?”

    Since when was anyone around here afraid of backlash? ;)

  • It’s a bad idea because it’s a failed attempt to provide a segregated infrastructure for bikes. Cyclists need to look at what segregated bike infrastructure does and says to cyclists. On the surface it appears to be a welcoming gesture, but in reality endangers cyclists at the expense of appeasing motorists. Look at the picture above and take into consideration drivers taking a right turn at the green light. With all those parked cars keeping cyclists out of view, drivers really won’t see a cyclist before they hit one. Forget cycle tracks and bike lanes in the city. Keep everyone driving/riding in the same, easy-to-understand way instead of creating conflicts which pit a human body against thousands of pounds of metal. Maybe that doesn’t attract as high of a number of new cyclists, but safety of cyclists should come first instead of using them as statistics for bragging purposes.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

Touring Portland’s Brand New Car-Free Bridge

|
Okay, it seems like now Portland is just showing off. The city is putting the finishing touches on the Tilikum Bridge, a multi-modal span that will serve buses, cyclists, pedestrians and trains — but no cars. This bridge has it all: a safe walking and biking path, transitways free of traffic congestion, sleek design, bike counters, a […]

Long Beach’s Leap Toward Livability – Part 2 of 2

|
(There’s a lot of great bike and walk improvements happening in Long Beach, so L.A. StreetsBlog has covered it in two parts, for now. Last week’s article featured the past and present; today’s features exciting plans for the future.) Photo: Joe Linton Long Beach’s mobility coordinator Charlie Gandy has big plans. During L.A. Streetsblog’s interview […]

All Eyes on Portland at Bike Summit

|
An organized ride on one of Portland’s bike boulevards. If there was a star at yesterday’s National Bike Summit, it was Portland, Oregon. After Earl Blumenauer, one of the city’s congressional reps and a former county commissioner, delivered the morning address, Portland’s bike planners and advocates shared their strategies at some of the more urban-focused […]
STREETSBLOG USA

In Portland, Construction Can’t Kill a Bike Lane

|
This temporary bike lane is actually wider than the permanent one that’s being blocked by construciton. (Photo: Portlandize) Here’s an indicator of how important bike lanes are in the city of Portland. From Streetsblog Network member Portlandize comes a report on a case in which a bike lane was recently closed because of streetcar construction. […]