D.C. City Government Considers “Cash for Close-in Urban Living”

The nation’s capital is proposing to use money from the Obama
administration’s economic stimulus law for a pilot program that would
give grants of up to $3,000 for suburban commuters to move closer to
transit or their place of work.

washington_metro_washington_d_c_dc123.jpgThe interior of a D.C. Metro station. (Photo: PlanetWare)

The Live Near Your Work grants being weighed by D.C. would use
$90,000 to offer incentives for 30 local workers to move within 1.5
miles of their office, a half-mile of a Metro rail station or a
quarter-mile of a bus stop.

The program would be an "experiment" along the lines of "cash for clunkers," the city’s Department of the Environment director told the Washington Examiner:

"The biggest driver of how much energy somebody uses is where they
live," said George Hawkins, DDOE director. "We’re trying to get people
to live closer to where they work. It’s not a lot of money, but it’s
something we want to pilot to see how it goes."

Incentive programs that aim to encourage work-accessible living patterns are already in place in Baltimore, Minneapolis, and Chattanooga, Tennessee.

  • DJB

    This sounds promising. One challenge is identifying a stable source of funding to make the program permanent (and expand it nationally). At the risk of sounding like a broken record may I suggest taxing fossil fuels? This would make it a double incentive: you move to avoid the higher expense of commuting and to take advantage of the subsidy.

    There’s no guarantee that living close to transit means people will use it (although it probably makes it more likely that they will, other things equal). Also, it doesn’t do much good to move close to your job for a month or something to cash in on a subsidy and then go right back to long-distance commuting.

    Therefore, it seems like it would be best to pay for the program through a carbon tax and require people to live within a certain radius of their job for some specific amount of time to get any subsidy (or base the amount of subsidy on the duration of residence) and possibly give a higher subsidy for living within that radius AND close to transit.

    On the other hand, what about people who are living close to work and transit already? Do they get anything?

  • This is a fantastic idea – Cyndi Lauper called it, money changes everything

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Metro Extends Reach With Its New First Last Mile Strategic Plan

|
At its April 2014 meeting, the Metro board approved its First Last Mile Strategic Plan & Planning Guidelines. For readers unfamiliar with “first last mile” terminology, it’s planner-speak for looking at the portion of a transit trip between a transit stop and one’s final destination, most often a home or work place. Generally every transit trip […]

Metro Committee Approves All-Paid Parking For 3 New Expo Stations

|
Yesterday, Metro’s Planning and Programming Committee approved the initial phase of the agency’s new Parking Management Pilot Program. The program is anticipated to begin with three new Expo station parking lots in May: Sepulveda, Bundy, and 17th Street. The pilot is anticipated to expand to nine rail station parking lots by Winter 2016. Here is how it […]
STREETSBLOG USA

US DOT Awards 72 TIGER Grants, But the Program Remains in Jeopardy

|
(Los Angeles editor’s note: The L.A. Register reports that California was awarded six TIGER grants, including two for L.A. Metro to improve first/last mile connections to rail stations. The two Metro stations to receive TIGER-funded improvements are the existing Metro Blue/Green Line Willowbrook/Rosa Parks Station, and the under-construction Regional Connector line’s Little Tokyo station at […]