Gauging a Transpo Bill’s Chances in the Senate

It remains to be seen whether lawmakers will move on a new long-term federal transportation bill
this year. If they do, what might the opposition look like, and how
will legislators react? These are the questions posed today by Yonah
Freemark at The Transport Politic.

Senate3.jpg

To
get an idea of how a new funding package might fare in the Senate,
Freemark has compiled a scorecard of key transportation votes — which
he’s dubbed the Transport Index 2009. As with most issues, the Index
finds that support for investment in sustainable modes and maintenance
of existing infrastructure is split along party lines.

In response to the President’s State of the Union Address in February, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal (R) criticized the stimulus, arguing that it was "larded with wasteful spending."
He pointed to the $8 billion devoted to high-speed rail as a
specifically unnecessary expenditure. It became clear at that moment
that the road to an improved American transportation system would not
be a straight shot. How will the members of the Senate react when they
are forced to consider expanding the federal commitment to
transportation? That’s what this Transport Index is intended to
anticipate.

The health reform debate of the last several
weeks has made evident the fact that Republicans in Congress will be
able to rile up an intimidating opposition to legislation proposed by
the Democratic Party. Though Democrats have 60 seats in the Senate — a
number that is large enough to vote down a potentially fatal filibuster
— the sudden arrival of thousands of right-wing demonstrators on scene
at town hall meetings has slowed down and problematized the passage of
any legislation.

Would Republicans stage a similar temper
tantrum if the Congress embarked on a massive transportation program?
It’s unclear, but Mr. Jindal’s reaction in February indicates that it’s
a distinct possibility.

What do you think of this ranking
system? Can Democratic senators from Montana, North Dakota, and
Arkansas be counted on to support a bill that invests in urban transit?

More on the Network: Hard Drive details how a bike shop owner in Portland, Oregon has instituted his own Cash for Clunkers program; Urban Review STL looks at how towns are messing up Main Street; Copenhagenize anticipates the arrival of "bicycle superhighways"; and Plan Philly reports on a city plan to speed bus travel.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

Sneak Preview: 2013 in Transit

|
Bus rapid transit projects in Austin, Tampa, and the Twin Cities. Streetcars in St. Louis, New Orleans, and Detroit. Those are just a few of the transit projects beginning construction or entering service in 2013, which looks to be a pretty good year for transit expansion in the U.S., says Yonah Freemark at the Transport […]

Suburban Poverty and the Transit Connection

|
Today on the Streetsblog Network, Yonah Freemark of The Transport Politic looks at the new Brookings Institution report on suburban poverty levels and the connection to future transportation planning in those regions. Freemark, who recently wrote about how the city of Paris is extending its transit infrastructure to its traditionally lower-income suburbs, points out that […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Putting the Price of California HSR in Perspective

|
The American transportation industry collectively raised its eyebrows this week when the California High-Speed Rail Authority released its revised business plan. The sticker price for the 220mph line along the California coast rose to $98 billion, three times the original estimate of $33 billion. The authority’s revised plan also included a new completion date of […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Ready to Fight? The House GOP Bill Leaves Little Choice

|
Well, the cards are on the table now, as far as national transportation policy is concerned. The Senate managed to put together bipartisan support for legislation that weakens biking and walking programs while including a few progressive reforms to transit policy. House Republicans, meanwhile, have lined up behind a draconian vision for highways-only transportation policy […]