<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “No More Cars” vs. “Not More Cars”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/08/12/%e2%80%9cno-more-cars%e2%80%9d-vs-%e2%80%9cnot-more-cars%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/08/12/%e2%80%9cno-more-cars%e2%80%9d-vs-%e2%80%9cnot-more-cars%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spokker</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/08/12/%e2%80%9cno-more-cars%e2%80%9d-vs-%e2%80%9cnot-more-cars%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-21461</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=7201#comment-21461</guid>
		<description>Exactly, Fred. 

Last night there was a meteor shower. If someone wants to see it they have to get out to Joshua Tree or something. That&#039;s a perfect reason to rent a ZipCar and go drive out there. 

But to commute into Downtown every day in a car? That&#039;s the dumbest idea in the history of dumb ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, Fred. </p>
<p>Last night there was a meteor shower. If someone wants to see it they have to get out to Joshua Tree or something. That&#8217;s a perfect reason to rent a ZipCar and go drive out there. </p>
<p>But to commute into Downtown every day in a car? That&#8217;s the dumbest idea in the history of dumb ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Camino</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/08/12/%e2%80%9cno-more-cars%e2%80%9d-vs-%e2%80%9cnot-more-cars%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-21421</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Camino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=7201#comment-21421</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad he came out and said it.  There&#039;s nothing inherently wrong with cars and they can be a fantastic way to travel.  Certainly they are great for transporting light cargo and for traveling to rural areas.  The problem is that a great form of transportation was deemed the de-facto national form of transportation and huges amounts of resources went into making it the de-facto form (in a VERY socialized manner by the way, to all the anti-socialism peeps on the right and pro-socialism peeps on the left).  100 years later we discover that by virtually making the car the only option, we&#039;ve lost many advantages of the car (freeways were once supposed to be faster than surface streets) and are left without any other good options.  Sad tale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad he came out and said it.  There&#8217;s nothing inherently wrong with cars and they can be a fantastic way to travel.  Certainly they are great for transporting light cargo and for traveling to rural areas.  The problem is that a great form of transportation was deemed the de-facto national form of transportation and huges amounts of resources went into making it the de-facto form (in a VERY socialized manner by the way, to all the anti-socialism peeps on the right and pro-socialism peeps on the left).  100 years later we discover that by virtually making the car the only option, we&#8217;ve lost many advantages of the car (freeways were once supposed to be faster than surface streets) and are left without any other good options.  Sad tale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

