<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is It Time for California to Adopt the &#8220;3-Feet-Law?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/08/06/is-it-time-for-california-to-adopt-the-3-feet-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/08/06/is-it-time-for-california-to-adopt-the-3-feet-law/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: e.n</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/08/06/is-it-time-for-california-to-adopt-the-3-feet-law/comment-page-1/#comment-108971</link>
		<dc:creator>e.n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=6611#comment-108971</guid>
		<description>and just how does the LAPD interpret &quot;a safe distance?&quot; 

i once asked when reporting a road rage incident.  the answer is: &quot;if he didnt hit you, it was safe.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and just how does the LAPD interpret &#8220;a safe distance?&#8221; </p>
<p>i once asked when reporting a road rage incident.  the answer is: &#8220;if he didnt hit you, it was safe.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/08/06/is-it-time-for-california-to-adopt-the-3-feet-law/comment-page-1/#comment-19891</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=6611#comment-19891</guid>
		<description>Check out the link below the image of the bike jersey. I&#039;m not normally a big fan of bike jerseys, I thought the &quot;3 feet please&quot; jerseys are really cool and promote safety no matter where you live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the link below the image of the bike jersey. I&#8217;m not normally a big fan of bike jerseys, I thought the &#8220;3 feet please&#8221; jerseys are really cool and promote safety no matter where you live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJB</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/08/06/is-it-time-for-california-to-adopt-the-3-feet-law/comment-page-1/#comment-19871</link>
		<dc:creator>DJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=6611#comment-19871</guid>
		<description>This law would be good if it were enforced and people cared about it. It&#039;s clear that there&#039;s a long way to go.

Have you ever heard the term &quot;bike nazi&quot;? I have. In a class on transportation planning. It basically means a cyclist who is assertive: riding in a regular traffic lane and &quot;slowing everybody down&quot;. The war for hearts and minds is far from won, even among those who pay attention to these issues.

Given that a widespread change in popular consciousness is needed for laws like the 3-feet law to have any practical effect, how can this blog and other advocacy get more people&#039;s attention?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This law would be good if it were enforced and people cared about it. It&#8217;s clear that there&#8217;s a long way to go.</p>
<p>Have you ever heard the term &#8220;bike nazi&#8221;? I have. In a class on transportation planning. It basically means a cyclist who is assertive: riding in a regular traffic lane and &#8220;slowing everybody down&#8221;. The war for hearts and minds is far from won, even among those who pay attention to these issues.</p>
<p>Given that a widespread change in popular consciousness is needed for laws like the 3-feet law to have any practical effect, how can this blog and other advocacy get more people&#8217;s attention?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angle</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/08/06/is-it-time-for-california-to-adopt-the-3-feet-law/comment-page-1/#comment-19831</link>
		<dc:creator>angle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=6611#comment-19831</guid>
		<description>In my experience, a &quot;safe passing distance&quot; is interpreted by some drivers as &quot;I didn&#039;t hit the cyclist&quot;. Specifying three feet at least gives everyone a concrete standard of what a safe passing distance is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, a &#8220;safe passing distance&#8221; is interpreted by some drivers as &#8220;I didn&#8217;t hit the cyclist&#8221;. Specifying three feet at least gives everyone a concrete standard of what a safe passing distance is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bikinginla</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/08/06/is-it-time-for-california-to-adopt-the-3-feet-law/comment-page-1/#comment-19811</link>
		<dc:creator>bikinginla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=6611#comment-19811</guid>
		<description>This should be low hanging fruit. All it does is clarify existing law — instead of requiring a &quot;safe distance&quot; to pass, all it does is specify what that distance is. 

Yet for some reason, police and trade groups seem to fight it tooth and nail all over the country. You&#039;d think they&#039;d all get behind it, since it removes any confusion about what&#039;s safe, and makes it clear it&#039;s okay to cross divider lines to pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be low hanging fruit. All it does is clarify existing law — instead of requiring a &#8220;safe distance&#8221; to pass, all it does is specify what that distance is. </p>
<p>Yet for some reason, police and trade groups seem to fight it tooth and nail all over the country. You&#8217;d think they&#8217;d all get behind it, since it removes any confusion about what&#8217;s safe, and makes it clear it&#8217;s okay to cross divider lines to pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yangmusa</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/08/06/is-it-time-for-california-to-adopt-the-3-feet-law/comment-page-1/#comment-19801</link>
		<dc:creator>Yangmusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=6611#comment-19801</guid>
		<description>Given how poorly existing traffic laws are enforced (for example the ban on using cellphones while driving), I doubt that a 3-foot passing law would make any practical difference. 

That said - change comes gradually, and passing a law like this (even if it should be common sense!) is at least a start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given how poorly existing traffic laws are enforced (for example the ban on using cellphones while driving), I doubt that a 3-foot passing law would make any practical difference. </p>
<p>That said &#8211; change comes gradually, and passing a law like this (even if it should be common sense!) is at least a start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

