Comments on: Drunk Hit-and-Run Murderer in Santa Clarita Not First Time Offender

By: Arden

Arden — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:05:13 +0000

Thank you for keeping us informed. I copied all the links you posted to our Yahoo Group to spread the word.

By: Zane Selvans

Zane Selvans — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:03:15 +0000

I put it into the Bikewise database.

By: Brian

Brian — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:27:45 +0000

Jeff — I appreciate the links. There is SO much wrong in that second article, I just don’t know where to begin.

I feel less hopeful and less human.

PS. The back button and spam filter on this site do not get along. Fail.

By: Spokker

Spokker — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:21:31 +0000

At least when you’re drunk in the subway you only get the shit beaten out of you by an overzealous security guard. Much safer in my opinion.

By: DJB

DJB — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:44:42 +0000

Technically, Valencia is entitled to a presumption of innocence unless proven guilty in a court of law. I thought your tone was more appropriate in the previous post on the subject.

As we condemn reckless driving in general, we should keep this in mind. Although Valencia could very well be guilty, that is for a jury to decide in the context of a trial.

Also, it seems like partnering with Mothers Against Drunk Driving in this line of advocacy could be fruitful.

By: Jeff

Jeff — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:24:36 +0000

Actually this was a better article.

http://www.the-signal.com/news/article/15558/

By: Jeff

Jeff — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:19:57 +0000

It’s even worse. He was driving on a suspended license and had two prior DUIs.

The local newspaper found an eyewitness to the crash. Read his description of the driver and the accident, it will really anger you.

http://www.the-signal.com/news/article/15532/

I’m trying to help organize a Silent memorial ride. If anyone in Los Angeles is interested, watch for details on my blog, http://www.scvtalk.com.