<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House Dems Agree: Climate Bill Can Help Pay for Greener Transportation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/06/24/house-dems-agree-climate-bill-can-help-pay-for-greener-transportation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/06/24/house-dems-agree-climate-bill-can-help-pay-for-greener-transportation/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin N</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/06/24/house-dems-agree-climate-bill-can-help-pay-for-greener-transportation/comment-page-1/#comment-7401</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=2511#comment-7401</guid>
		<description>Wait... so it&#039;s one hundreth of $70bn? That comes out to a whopping $700m, for all 50 states. Assuming allocation based upon population, that means California will get all of $87.5m, or a couple of miles of light rail for the whole state. It seems to me that, since transportation emissions constitute around half (49% acc. to CalPIRG figures) of our greenhouse gas emissions, this plan ought to allocate half of those monies for transportation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait&#8230; so it&#8217;s one hundreth of $70bn? That comes out to a whopping $700m, for all 50 states. Assuming allocation based upon population, that means California will get all of $87.5m, or a couple of miles of light rail for the whole state. It seems to me that, since transportation emissions constitute around half (49% acc. to CalPIRG figures) of our greenhouse gas emissions, this plan ought to allocate half of those monies for transportation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

