<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solve the Congestion Crisis And Win $50,000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/06/01/solve-the-congestion-crisis-and-win-50000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/06/01/solve-the-congestion-crisis-and-win-50000/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean  Wise</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/06/01/solve-the-congestion-crisis-and-win-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-6245</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean  Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=2209#comment-6245</guid>
		<description>Wow, great ideas above.
But if you don&#039;t get them in,
then they can&#039;t win!

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, great ideas above.<br />
But if you don&#8217;t get them in,<br />
then they can&#8217;t win!</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walker_0</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/06/01/solve-the-congestion-crisis-and-win-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-6065</link>
		<dc:creator>walker_0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=2209#comment-6065</guid>
		<description>Subsidize bike ownership and make people pay 10% of their wealth or 15% of their income each year, whichever is more, for the privilege of owning a car. Increase the rate 5% a year until everyone sells their cars and rides bikes or walks. Once people see that cars are totally unnecessary and know the true value of exercise they will be happy.  Mobile phones can be cut next. People don&#039;t realize how much C02 is released because of our cumulative use of mobile phones. These are luxury items. How did we ever survive before cars and mobile phones?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subsidize bike ownership and make people pay 10% of their wealth or 15% of their income each year, whichever is more, for the privilege of owning a car. Increase the rate 5% a year until everyone sells their cars and rides bikes or walks. Once people see that cars are totally unnecessary and know the true value of exercise they will be happy.  Mobile phones can be cut next. People don&#8217;t realize how much C02 is released because of our cumulative use of mobile phones. These are luxury items. How did we ever survive before cars and mobile phones?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stats Dude</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/06/01/solve-the-congestion-crisis-and-win-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-6047</link>
		<dc:creator>Stats Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=2209#comment-6047</guid>
		<description>A brief background on ITS. It stands for Intelligent Transportation Systems. An example is the coordination of L.A. street signals from a central location from the movie &quot;The Italian Job&quot; (yes, it really exists).

It also includes GPS on buses for better tracking, the use of tritter by MetroLink to notify passengers if there are any problems, and the preemption of traffic signals for the Metro Rapid buses. 

Having traffic signals recognize bicycles would be considered ITS.

If there ever is a Vehicle Miles Traveled tax (beyond the gas tax, such as for electric cars), then ITS will likely be used to send odometer information out to who knows where. 

Anyway, I digress. The purpose of ITS is to use new and innovative technologies to make the existing transportation work more efficiently without having to resort to expensive capital improvements like adding lanes or more freeways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A brief background on ITS. It stands for Intelligent Transportation Systems. An example is the coordination of L.A. street signals from a central location from the movie &#8220;The Italian Job&#8221; (yes, it really exists).</p>
<p>It also includes GPS on buses for better tracking, the use of tritter by MetroLink to notify passengers if there are any problems, and the preemption of traffic signals for the Metro Rapid buses. </p>
<p>Having traffic signals recognize bicycles would be considered ITS.</p>
<p>If there ever is a Vehicle Miles Traveled tax (beyond the gas tax, such as for electric cars), then ITS will likely be used to send odometer information out to who knows where. </p>
<p>Anyway, I digress. The purpose of ITS is to use new and innovative technologies to make the existing transportation work more efficiently without having to resort to expensive capital improvements like adding lanes or more freeways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJB</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/06/01/solve-the-congestion-crisis-and-win-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-6046</link>
		<dc:creator>DJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=2209#comment-6046</guid>
		<description>How to reduce traffic? I don&#039;t think that should be our first priority and I don&#039;t agree that the methods are obvious to the general public.

But anyway, you could . . .

1) Make driving more expensive (through fuel, road and parking charges)
2) Invest more in alternatives to driving (transit, &quot;complete&quot; streets that accommodate all modes of transportation)
3) Support alternative transportation with dense and mixed land uses (more people per unit of area and housing closer to the stuff people do)
4) Give out subsidies for living close to work (instead of subsidizing home ownership in general)

People tend to want less traffic so that they can drive their car unobstructed. They get angry at other people on the road, but fail to consider their own impact.

The bigger problem is the environmental degradation that comes from automobile use, not to mention the death toll (on the order of 40,000 per year, or about 13 9/11s) . . .

Good luck getting people to see that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to reduce traffic? I don&#8217;t think that should be our first priority and I don&#8217;t agree that the methods are obvious to the general public.</p>
<p>But anyway, you could . . .</p>
<p>1) Make driving more expensive (through fuel, road and parking charges)<br />
2) Invest more in alternatives to driving (transit, &#8220;complete&#8221; streets that accommodate all modes of transportation)<br />
3) Support alternative transportation with dense and mixed land uses (more people per unit of area and housing closer to the stuff people do)<br />
4) Give out subsidies for living close to work (instead of subsidizing home ownership in general)</p>
<p>People tend to want less traffic so that they can drive their car unobstructed. They get angry at other people on the road, but fail to consider their own impact.</p>
<p>The bigger problem is the environmental degradation that comes from automobile use, not to mention the death toll (on the order of 40,000 per year, or about 13 9/11s) . . .</p>
<p>Good luck getting people to see that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik G.</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/06/01/solve-the-congestion-crisis-and-win-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-6045</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=2209#comment-6045</guid>
		<description>It always amazes me how much less traffic there is on the Toll Roads in OC than there is on the parallel &quot;Free&quot;ways.

Look at SR73 versus I-405

Look at SR133 plus SR241 versus SR55 or SR57.

So what would happen if we made everyone pay a buck or two at the on-ramp?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always amazes me how much less traffic there is on the Toll Roads in OC than there is on the parallel &#8220;Free&#8221;ways.</p>
<p>Look at SR73 versus I-405</p>
<p>Look at SR133 plus SR241 versus SR55 or SR57.</p>
<p>So what would happen if we made everyone pay a buck or two at the on-ramp?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/06/01/solve-the-congestion-crisis-and-win-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-6042</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=2209#comment-6042</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t understand why we&#039;re looking for innovative solutions to traffic congestion when we don&#039;t have the political will to implement the obvious and mundane ones...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t understand why we&#8217;re looking for innovative solutions to traffic congestion when we don&#8217;t have the political will to implement the obvious and mundane ones&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

