<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Council Transportation Committee Moves to Remove Traffic Calming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/05/06/council-transportation-committee-moves-to-remove-traffic-calming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/05/06/council-transportation-committee-moves-to-remove-traffic-calming/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:23:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ubrayj02</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/05/06/council-transportation-committee-moves-to-remove-traffic-calming/comment-page-1/#comment-5628</link>
		<dc:creator>ubrayj02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=2108#comment-5628</guid>
		<description>Just heard Councilman Wiess, Mr. Would-Be-LA-Attorney, on KPCC. That guys pisses me off. He had this super freindly, &quot;pro-bike&quot; message a couple of weeks ago, and then he stands up in a public hearing to tear down traffic calming and increase car speeds. What the hell is pro-bike about that?

Freakin&#039; hypocrite. 

I&#039;m voting for Trutanich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just heard Councilman Wiess, Mr. Would-Be-LA-Attorney, on KPCC. That guys pisses me off. He had this super freindly, "pro-bike" message a couple of weeks ago, and then he stands up in a public hearing to tear down traffic calming and increase car speeds. What the hell is pro-bike about that?</p>
<p>Freakin' hypocrite. </p>
<p>I'm voting for Trutanich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn M</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/05/06/council-transportation-committee-moves-to-remove-traffic-calming/comment-page-1/#comment-5610</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 04:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=2108#comment-5610</guid>
		<description>There is no need for it near Palazzo. The apartments are only 20% occupied and this is on the side of the building that they enter. 

The entire project is a failure except Trader Joe&#039;s. Even Rite Aid has lost more than 50% of their business since the move from Westwood Blvd..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no need for it near Palazzo. The apartments are only 20% occupied and this is on the side of the building that they enter. </p>
<p>The entire project is a failure except Trader Joe's. Even Rite Aid has lost more than 50% of their business since the move from Westwood Blvd..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/05/06/council-transportation-committee-moves-to-remove-traffic-calming/comment-page-1/#comment-5602</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 21:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=2108#comment-5602</guid>
		<description>wow. While they are definitely two sides to this story that need to be reconciled and traffic calming needs to be done in a more wholistic neighborhood approach than it appears here - it&#039;s very disappointing that the infrastructure will be removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. While they are definitely two sides to this story that need to be reconciled and traffic calming needs to be done in a more wholistic neighborhood approach than it appears here - it's very disappointing that the infrastructure will be removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Kavanagh</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/05/06/council-transportation-committee-moves-to-remove-traffic-calming/comment-page-1/#comment-5601</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Kavanagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=2108#comment-5601</guid>
		<description>Tom LaBonge sucks as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom LaBonge sucks as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubrayj02</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/05/06/council-transportation-committee-moves-to-remove-traffic-calming/comment-page-1/#comment-5600</link>
		<dc:creator>ubrayj02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=2108#comment-5600</guid>
		<description>&quot;According to Councilman LaBonge ...&quot; followed by b.s. about transportation is no surprise.

I can&#039;t believe how horrible this City can be. Can we install low-cost safety devices on the roads to encourage walking, bicycling, and livability? Yes we can. We can also rip them out for no goddamned reason at any time to suit a bunch of pointy headed bosses at the LADOT and a corrupt city leadership. I wish it took a constantly re-defined super-majority for these incumbent bums to get re-elected - then they&#039;d see what it feels like to have a neighborhood that has been protected being re-opened to the speeding hordes based on totally arbitrary and illegal methods.

The DOT&#039;s policy is just that, a policy. The Neighborhood Protection Plan is a quasi-legal agreement between the developer and the community, which the City has violated the terms of. I think that a suit against the City by the public that voted for traffic calming is in order.

Shame on the Transpo. Committee. Those clowns have sacrificed a neighborhood for their own inter-office relationships in city hall. They are clowns indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"According to Councilman LaBonge ..." followed by b.s. about transportation is no surprise.</p>
<p>I can't believe how horrible this City can be. Can we install low-cost safety devices on the roads to encourage walking, bicycling, and livability? Yes we can. We can also rip them out for no goddamned reason at any time to suit a bunch of pointy headed bosses at the LADOT and a corrupt city leadership. I wish it took a constantly re-defined super-majority for these incumbent bums to get re-elected - then they'd see what it feels like to have a neighborhood that has been protected being re-opened to the speeding hordes based on totally arbitrary and illegal methods.</p>
<p>The DOT's policy is just that, a policy. The Neighborhood Protection Plan is a quasi-legal agreement between the developer and the community, which the City has violated the terms of. I think that a suit against the City by the public that voted for traffic calming is in order.</p>
<p>Shame on the Transpo. Committee. Those clowns have sacrificed a neighborhood for their own inter-office relationships in city hall. They are clowns indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
