<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Biking in LA: The Pedestrian Free Crosswalk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/02/09/from-biking-in-la-the-pedestrian-free-crosswalk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/02/09/from-biking-in-la-the-pedestrian-free-crosswalk/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/02/09/from-biking-in-la-the-pedestrian-free-crosswalk/comment-page-1/#comment-4143</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1728#comment-4143</guid>
		<description>This sounds like Bush&#039;s plan to reduce forest fires - cut down all the trees!
I have a better idea to improve cross walk safety: remove the cars instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like Bush&#8217;s plan to reduce forest fires &#8211; cut down all the trees!<br />
I have a better idea to improve cross walk safety: remove the cars instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Newton</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/02/09/from-biking-in-la-the-pedestrian-free-crosswalk/comment-page-1/#comment-4136</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1728#comment-4136</guid>
		<description>I have a couple of emails into LADOT asking for clarification.  I&#039;ll let you all know if/when I hear anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a couple of emails into LADOT asking for clarification.  I&#8217;ll let you all know if/when I hear anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WestSiderRider</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/02/09/from-biking-in-la-the-pedestrian-free-crosswalk/comment-page-1/#comment-4135</link>
		<dc:creator>WestSiderRider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1728#comment-4135</guid>
		<description>Wow... just wow.

I&#039;m new to LA Streetsblog and this is just an incredible sight.

I wonder if anyone has received a ticket for crossing at this crosswalk.  The sign is meaningless without enforcement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; just wow.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m new to LA Streetsblog and this is just an incredible sight.</p>
<p>I wonder if anyone has received a ticket for crossing at this crosswalk.  The sign is meaningless without enforcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umberto Brayj</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/02/09/from-biking-in-la-the-pedestrian-free-crosswalk/comment-page-1/#comment-4132</link>
		<dc:creator>Umberto Brayj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1728#comment-4132</guid>
		<description>Yes, this does make sense:

&quot;TDM&quot; and &quot;Live/Work&quot; are obviously double speak for &quot;stuff to make people shut up and let us keep on designing roads for cars&quot;.

There are no standard in the General Plan, or any extant plan I am aware of, that call for &lt;b&gt;measurement&lt;/b&gt; of pedestrian access. The LADOT barely measures car throughput (relying on old models for LOS, ADT, and VMT), and in a domain where only civil engineers are called on for design standards (not sociologists, urban planners, anthropologists, or locals) this, I gues, is no surprise at all.

The crosswalk is eye candy in L.A., like those ridiculous bits of &quot;nature&quot; stapled to the outside perimeter of strip malls that &quot;mitigate&quot; the sheer ugliness of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this does make sense:</p>
<p>&#8220;TDM&#8221; and &#8220;Live/Work&#8221; are obviously double speak for &#8220;stuff to make people shut up and let us keep on designing roads for cars&#8221;.</p>
<p>There are no standard in the General Plan, or any extant plan I am aware of, that call for <b>measurement</b> of pedestrian access. The LADOT barely measures car throughput (relying on old models for LOS, ADT, and VMT), and in a domain where only civil engineers are called on for design standards (not sociologists, urban planners, anthropologists, or locals) this, I gues, is no surprise at all.</p>
<p>The crosswalk is eye candy in L.A., like those ridiculous bits of &#8220;nature&#8221; stapled to the outside perimeter of strip malls that &#8220;mitigate&#8221; the sheer ugliness of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cochon</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/02/09/from-biking-in-la-the-pedestrian-free-crosswalk/comment-page-1/#comment-4131</link>
		<dc:creator>cochon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1728#comment-4131</guid>
		<description>fail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarence Eckerson</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/02/09/from-biking-in-la-the-pedestrian-free-crosswalk/comment-page-1/#comment-4130</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarence Eckerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1728#comment-4130</guid>
		<description>WTF?  This might be screaming for a Streetfilm!  I mean, most crosswalks aren&#039;t done that nicely with beautiful pavers and such....and then to have it illegal to cross?  Wow.  Crazy times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF?  This might be screaming for a Streetfilm!  I mean, most crosswalks aren&#8217;t done that nicely with beautiful pavers and such&#8230;.and then to have it illegal to cross?  Wow.  Crazy times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bikinginla</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/02/09/from-biking-in-la-the-pedestrian-free-crosswalk/comment-page-1/#comment-4129</link>
		<dc:creator>bikinginla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1728#comment-4129</guid>
		<description>It makes sense to me to tear the signs down -- there are at least three No Pedestrian signs there -- but the question is, why did they go up in the first place? This intersection has always had a crosswalk there, and now that they&#039;ve built a supposedly pedestrian-friendly live/work complex on that corner, they try to actively discourage pedestrians. Does that make sense to anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes sense to me to tear the signs down &#8212; there are at least three No Pedestrian signs there &#8212; but the question is, why did they go up in the first place? This intersection has always had a crosswalk there, and now that they&#8217;ve built a supposedly pedestrian-friendly live/work complex on that corner, they try to actively discourage pedestrians. Does that make sense to anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mechazawa</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/02/09/from-biking-in-la-the-pedestrian-free-crosswalk/comment-page-1/#comment-4127</link>
		<dc:creator>mechazawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1728#comment-4127</guid>
		<description>its not going to improve traffic. which is big motivator for the city to make odd policies. but this right here...why are they trying to restrict people? Or is it that they did not get what is happening when they made it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its not going to improve traffic. which is big motivator for the city to make odd policies. but this right here&#8230;why are they trying to restrict people? Or is it that they did not get what is happening when they made it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umberto Brayj</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/02/09/from-biking-in-la-the-pedestrian-free-crosswalk/comment-page-1/#comment-4126</link>
		<dc:creator>Umberto Brayj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1728#comment-4126</guid>
		<description>Gaaahh!!!

WTF?!

Would it really be that wrong to just rip that stupid sign down? I&#039;ll pay for the darn tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaaahh!!!</p>
<p>WTF?!</p>
<p>Would it really be that wrong to just rip that stupid sign down? I&#8217;ll pay for the darn tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

