<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wiki Wednesday: “Shovel-Ready” Pedestrian Safety Plans?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/01/07/wiki-wednesday-%e2%80%9cshovel-ready%e2%80%9d-pedestrian-safety-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/01/07/wiki-wednesday-%e2%80%9cshovel-ready%e2%80%9d-pedestrian-safety-plans/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:23:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linda Wei</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/01/07/wiki-wednesday-%e2%80%9cshovel-ready%e2%80%9d-pedestrian-safety-plans/comment-page-1/#comment-3716</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Wei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1585#comment-3716</guid>
		<description>i fully agree with you on your conclusion.

i live in Los Angeles and i&#039;m appalled at the pedestrian amenities presently available in the city. there are pedestrian crosswalks without either in-street warning lights or stop lights to back them up. coupled with insufficiently lit streets all throughout the city (or streets that are being re-vamped - which means the street lights are out anyway), the all pedestrians are pretty much just walking into death traps. i guess pedestrians means everybody cause at one time or another, everyone is a pedestrian.

what&#039;s so sad is that pedestrian amenities, just like bike amenities, can be the least labor and fiscally intensive projects to implement -- but always gets shafted up the ass when it comes to prioritization.

dude... WHAT the F^&amp;^.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i fully agree with you on your conclusion.</p>
<p>i live in Los Angeles and i'm appalled at the pedestrian amenities presently available in the city. there are pedestrian crosswalks without either in-street warning lights or stop lights to back them up. coupled with insufficiently lit streets all throughout the city (or streets that are being re-vamped - which means the street lights are out anyway), the all pedestrians are pretty much just walking into death traps. i guess pedestrians means everybody cause at one time or another, everyone is a pedestrian.</p>
<p>what's so sad is that pedestrian amenities, just like bike amenities, can be the least labor and fiscally intensive projects to implement -- but always gets shafted up the ass when it comes to prioritization.</p>
<p>dude... WHAT the F^&amp;^.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
