<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expansion of I-710, One of Worst Highway Projects in the Country</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/17/expansion-of-i-710-one-of-worst-highway-projects-in-the-country/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/17/expansion-of-i-710-one-of-worst-highway-projects-in-the-country/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metro Charcoal Line Extension</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/17/expansion-of-i-710-one-of-worst-highway-projects-in-the-country/comment-page-1/#comment-552364</link>
		<dc:creator>Metro Charcoal Line Extension</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1519#comment-552364</guid>
		<description>When is the new Metro Charcoal Line Extension of the Interstate 710 Freeway Projects from Cal State L.A. to Long Beach Transit Mall?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is the new Metro Charcoal Line Extension of the Interstate 710 Freeway Projects from Cal State L.A. to Long Beach Transit Mall?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calwatch</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/17/expansion-of-i-710-one-of-worst-highway-projects-in-the-country/comment-page-1/#comment-3460</link>
		<dc:creator>calwatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1519#comment-3460</guid>
		<description>On the other hand, you could run a tunnel for cars and buses only quite easily. Congestion price the hell out of it and it could pay for itself. Let&#039;s see if this tunnel, and the Palmdale-La Crescenta tunnel, can at least pay for operating and construction costs (excluding externalities) from user fees. I think it could, but the only way to find out is through a study.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, you could run a tunnel for cars and buses only quite easily. Congestion price the hell out of it and it could pay for itself. Let&#8217;s see if this tunnel, and the Palmdale-La Crescenta tunnel, can at least pay for operating and construction costs (excluding externalities) from user fees. I think it could, but the only way to find out is through a study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Linton</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/17/expansion-of-i-710-one-of-worst-highway-projects-in-the-country/comment-page-1/#comment-3455</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Linton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1519#comment-3455</guid>
		<description>This is an ugly project, in my opinion.  Not just the tunnel, but also the expansion planned for the lower 710 - if that goes through it&#039;s going to be massive - 10 regular lanes and 4 truck lanes.  Groan.  It&#039;s going to be hell for the LA River, too, which runs along it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an ugly project, in my opinion.  Not just the tunnel, but also the expansion planned for the lower 710 &#8211; if that goes through it&#8217;s going to be massive &#8211; 10 regular lanes and 4 truck lanes.  Groan.  It&#8217;s going to be hell for the LA River, too, which runs along it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubrayj02</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/17/expansion-of-i-710-one-of-worst-highway-projects-in-the-country/comment-page-1/#comment-3453</link>
		<dc:creator>ubrayj02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1519#comment-3453</guid>
		<description>The &quot;air quality will improve with vehicle speeds&quot; argument is so frustratingly stupid it makes my blood boil.

Yes, on a given highway, faster cars mean less air pollution BUT if there is no highway, there are no cars! If there are no cars, there is even less pollution! I think we should take proponents of the 710 and force them to dig the tunnel themselves if they like the idea so much. I&#039;ve got a shovel in my garage you yahoos can use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;air quality will improve with vehicle speeds&#8221; argument is so frustratingly stupid it makes my blood boil.</p>
<p>Yes, on a given highway, faster cars mean less air pollution BUT if there is no highway, there are no cars! If there are no cars, there is even less pollution! I think we should take proponents of the 710 and force them to dig the tunnel themselves if they like the idea so much. I&#8217;ve got a shovel in my garage you yahoos can use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/17/expansion-of-i-710-one-of-worst-highway-projects-in-the-country/comment-page-1/#comment-3450</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1519#comment-3450</guid>
		<description>I imagine people living near I-5 will be happy to have a lot of the diesel trucks going by their homes move to the 710.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine people living near I-5 will be happy to have a lot of the diesel trucks going by their homes move to the 710.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Gabbard</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/17/expansion-of-i-710-one-of-worst-highway-projects-in-the-country/comment-page-1/#comment-3446</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Gabbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1519#comment-3446</guid>
		<description>Sadly South Pasadena has eased its historic fight against the project as long as it is in a tunnel.

http://www.ci.south-pasadena.ca.us/transportation/710.html

I still think the staggering cost will kill this stupid project. Despite the ongoing campaign of Alhambra and Pasadena on its behalf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly South Pasadena has eased its historic fight against the project as long as it is in a tunnel.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ci.south-pasadena.ca.us/transportation/710.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ci.south-pasadena.ca.us/transportation/710.html</a></p>
<p>I still think the staggering cost will kill this stupid project. Despite the ongoing campaign of Alhambra and Pasadena on its behalf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

