<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Build a Better Infrastructure Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/03/how-to-build-a-better-infrastructure-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/03/how-to-build-a-better-infrastructure-plan/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:36:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dana Gabbard</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/03/how-to-build-a-better-infrastructure-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-3226</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Gabbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1454#comment-3226</guid>
		<description>&#039;setting strict criteria ... a real assessment of economic benefits and costs that consider environmental, energy, and social impacts&quot;. That sounds great but like any analysis how you measure these things and prioritize isn&#039;t always all that easy. This is a political process and to make it less so means taking on some sacred cows. Not impossible but we should not fool ourselves about how rough this fight will be. I think the idea of targting the states and metropolitan planning organizations for accountability is an excellent idea - far too often they are overly compliant by fudging the numbers to make sure the project lists match the local politicians&#039; wish lists...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>'setting strict criteria ... a real assessment of economic benefits and costs that consider environmental, energy, and social impacts". That sounds great but like any analysis how you measure these things and prioritize isn't always all that easy. This is a political process and to make it less so means taking on some sacred cows. Not impossible but we should not fool ourselves about how rough this fight will be. I think the idea of targting the states and metropolitan planning organizations for accountability is an excellent idea - far too often they are overly compliant by fudging the numbers to make sure the project lists match the local politicians' wish lists...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
