<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Build a Better Infrastructure Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/03/how-to-build-a-better-infrastructure-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/03/how-to-build-a-better-infrastructure-plan/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Gabbard</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/12/03/how-to-build-a-better-infrastructure-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-3226</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Gabbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=1454#comment-3226</guid>
		<description>&#039;setting strict criteria ... a real assessment of economic benefits and costs that consider environmental, energy, and social impacts&quot;. That sounds great but like any analysis how you measure these things and prioritize isn&#039;t always all that easy. This is a political process and to make it less so means taking on some sacred cows. Not impossible but we should not fool ourselves about how rough this fight will be. I think the idea of targting the states and metropolitan planning organizations for accountability is an excellent idea - far too often they are overly compliant by fudging the numbers to make sure the project lists match the local politicians&#039; wish lists...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;setting strict criteria &#8230; a real assessment of economic benefits and costs that consider environmental, energy, and social impacts&#8221;. That sounds great but like any analysis how you measure these things and prioritize isn&#8217;t always all that easy. This is a political process and to make it less so means taking on some sacred cows. Not impossible but we should not fool ourselves about how rough this fight will be. I think the idea of targting the states and metropolitan planning organizations for accountability is an excellent idea &#8211; far too often they are overly compliant by fudging the numbers to make sure the project lists match the local politicians&#8217; wish lists&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

