Voter Guide: Residents Fight Hotel and Condo Development in Beverly Hills

10_24_08_waldorf.jpg

Commuters who have to pass the crowded intersection of Wilshire and Santa Monica Boulevards know that is one of the most congested intersections in Los Angeles.  When commuters find out that the City of Beverly Hills has approved plans to replace the Hilton that sits on one of the corners of that intersection with a larger Waldorf-Astoria complex that includes two condominium towers, they wonder, sometimes graphically, what in the world the city was thinking.

They’re not alone.  2,700 residents of Beverly Hills signed a petition to place Measure H on this fall’s ballot, which would revoke the city’s approval for the project, forcing the developer to redesign their plans and go through the approval and environmental review processes all over again.  For their part, the developers claim the project will have a minimal traffic impact and will generate hundreds of millions of dollars for the community.

The Times explains the proposal and the related transportation plans:

 

Oasis West wants to overhaul the nine-acre property, replacing the
Hilton with a 170-room, 12-story Waldorf-Astoria hotel – 47 fewer rooms
and four added stories. It would be the West Coast’s first version of
the New York icon.

Plans also include two condominium high-rises: a six- to eight-story
tower with 26 to 36 units and a 16- to 18-story tower with 64 to 74
units, according to a statement. A two-story conference center would be
replaced, and a new park added with 4.5 acres of landscaping
and gardens.

The Hilton has promised to spend as much as $10 million on traffic
improvements, and estimates that in 30 years, the project would
generate $750 million in revenue for the city.

The bulk of the traffic improvement funds would be spend on widening Wilshire Boulevard to allow easier access to the complex and left hand turns at the light.

The City of Beverly Hills has developed a website to help explain the proposition to voters.  For a complete breakdown of the arguments for and against the project, please read the pdf. here.

Image: LA Curbed

  • They might try grade separating that intersection. Put Santa Monica under Wilshire and have off-ramps to deal with turning traffic

  • Better yet, build the freaking Purple Line already.

  • Grade separation?

    Ay carumba. You want to decrease traffic in the face of real estate development? Cut off access to automobiles. Prevent left hand turns (like the one that killed a cyclist at this same intersection a year and a half ago).

    Widening a congested road like this only leads to one thing: a congested road that is wider.

    Give people going to the hotel complex more transportation options (light rail would be nice) like: protected bus lanes, protected bike lanes, wide sidewalks, pedicab and taxi standing areas. All of the above, integrated into a modestly larger transportation network, will truly reduce the demand for more private automobile space.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Preliminary Federal Ruling Sides With Beverly Hills Against Metro Subway

|
Last week, United States District Judge George Wu issued a ruling [PDF] in Beverly Hills’ legal battles against Metro’s plans to tunnel the Purple Line subway beneath Beverly Hills High School. The Beverly Hills Courier portrayed the ruling as a victory for Beverly Hills in that Judge Wu chided subway proponents for “not properly considering the environmental effects […]

First Leg of Wilshire Bus Only Lanes Finally Opens

|
Moments ago, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and representatives of the Federal Transit Administration celebrated tomorrow’s official opening of  1.8 miles of Bus Only Lanes on Wilshire Boulevard between Western Avenue and South Park View St. at MacArthur Park. The lanes open tomorrow morning at 7 am, just in time for the morning rush hour. The 1.8 miles of bus only […]