Judge Rules Against BRU and NRDC. Fare Hikes Don’t Require EIS.

8_26_08_signs.jpgThe Bottleneck Blog reports that yesterday a Superior Court Judge ruled that Metro did not violate any laws when they raised fares last July without first completing an environmental review.  The thrust of the case was that because fare increases cause fewer people to ride transit, the increases will result in greater air pollution as more people turn to the automobile.

California law has a clear exemption from environmental reviews provided that the agency can show that the increased funds are going to operating costs.  However, the NRDC argued that you could see the clear effects of the increase on passengers.  Even while Metro rail experiences record ridership numbers, bus ridership has decreased 5%.

David Petit explains the basics in NRDC’s press release:

“Today’s ruling means more people will be forced to take potentially
more polluting forms of transportation to work, school or church. MTA
should make it easier, not harder, for riders to use public
transportation. When people switch from buses to cars due to higher bus
fares, the result will be dirtier air. There’s no question that the
cost of a bus ride impacts the environment."

There is no word from either the NRDC or the Bus Rider’s Union on whether or not there will be an appeal.

Photo: Damien Newton

  • anonymouse

    At some point, it just becomes about political micromanagement of how the agency runs its system, and that tends to lead to disaster. The solution is to pass legislation that sets up mandatory cost-of-living increases in fares. Portland has this policy, and it serves them well, depoliticizing the issue of regular fare increases.

  • I don’t disagree with #1; fare increases are a necessary thing in life. I disagree with their transfer policy, but overall the fare increases are reasonable, and fares are still cheaper than most big city transit systems. The concept that a fare increase requires an EIR is such a ludicrous concept that I was wondering if the BRU and NRDC were going to be sanctioned by the court. EIRs are powerful, but their purpose was meant for physical changes to the landscape.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

What Factors Are Causing Metro’s Declining Ridership? What Next?

|
In my circles, there has been a lot of discussion swirling around Wednesday’s Los Angeles Times article, Billions spent, but fewer people are using public transportation in Southern California, by Laura Nelson and Dan Weikel. The Times’ authors cast a disparaging light on recent downturns in ridership: “Despite a $9-billion investment in new light rail […]

A Preview of Metro’s $5.6 Billion Fiscal Year 2016 Budget

|
At 10 a.m. tomorrow, Saturday, April 25, the Metro Board of Directors is hosting a public meeting to receive input on the agency’s proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2016. It is expected that the Board of Directors will approve the budget at their May meeting. The agenda for tomorrow is slim, with no supporting materials. Since […]

BRU: No Fare Hikes Without Public Process

|
Image of "Times": Strategy Center/Flickr Earlier this morning, the Bus Rider’s Union rallied at the Wilshire/Western Transit Station to urge the Metro Board to not go forward with planned fare hikes for Metro bus and rail services until a full public hearing schedule is announced and executed. In May of 2007, the Metro Board adopted […]

Preliminary Federal Ruling Sides With Beverly Hills Against Metro Subway

|
Last week, United States District Judge George Wu issued a ruling [PDF] in Beverly Hills’ legal battles against Metro’s plans to tunnel the Purple Line subway beneath Beverly Hills High School. The Beverly Hills Courier portrayed the ruling as a victory for Beverly Hills in that Judge Wu chided subway proponents for “not properly considering the environmental effects […]

Spinning a Civil Rights Complaint

|
Late last week, most likely in response to a report by the Bus Riders Union and their community allies, a letter from Metro CEO Art Leahy dismissing the Civil Rights complaints of the BRU appeared on The Source.  The letter basically announced that the Title VI complaints against the agency announced last Spring were dismissed, […]