<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: San Gabriel Valley Pols Seek Compromise on I-210 Congestion Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:23:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Damien Newton</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1418</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/#comment-1418</guid>
		<description>As I understand it, the Gold Line extension is on the &quot;unfunded&quot; list of Metro&#039;s draft LRTP.  If the half cent sales tax proposal is placed on the ballot and passes, it gets funded.  If it doesn&#039;t, then there will be a food fight at the November Metro Board meeting.

That&#039;s why I find the posturing of the SGV folks so confusing.  Just get behind the sales tax proposal and they&#039;ll get what they want.  If they continue to be obstructionist then I doubt the Metro Board is going to move their proposal up the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it, the Gold Line extension is on the "unfunded" list of Metro's draft LRTP.  If the half cent sales tax proposal is placed on the ballot and passes, it gets funded.  If it doesn't, then there will be a food fight at the November Metro Board meeting.</p>
<p>That's why I find the posturing of the SGV folks so confusing.  Just get behind the sales tax proposal and they'll get what they want.  If they continue to be obstructionist then I doubt the Metro Board is going to move their proposal up the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wad</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>Wad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>Brayj, the answer is let&#039;s wait and see.

I see compelling arguments for and against getting the Gold Line extended. It can really go either way.

This is an interesting case, because Metro&#039;s bureaucrats have serious misgivings about the Gold Line extension. By the numbers, it is saying that the Gold Line will have a really low boarding density that will bring down the systemwide average. Even the Pasadena route that exists now -- the meat and potatoes of the line -- has badly underperformed.

The big worry is if Metro has to put in an application to the Federal Transit Administration and it comes back stamped with a &quot;not recommended.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brayj, the answer is let's wait and see.</p>
<p>I see compelling arguments for and against getting the Gold Line extended. It can really go either way.</p>
<p>This is an interesting case, because Metro's bureaucrats have serious misgivings about the Gold Line extension. By the numbers, it is saying that the Gold Line will have a really low boarding density that will bring down the systemwide average. Even the Pasadena route that exists now -- the meat and potatoes of the line -- has badly underperformed.</p>
<p>The big worry is if Metro has to put in an application to the Federal Transit Administration and it comes back stamped with a "not recommended."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubrayj02</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>ubrayj02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/#comment-1412</guid>
		<description>Wait, I&#039;m confused (really) when will the Gold Line be extended into the San Gabriel Valley into Monrovia? A lot of transit geeks have been saying bad things about this proposal - but having biked alongside the Metrolink right of way this past week, I think some of their criticism is unfair.

Would this back room compromise ensure that the Gold Line gets extended?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, I'm confused (really) when will the Gold Line be extended into the San Gabriel Valley into Monrovia? A lot of transit geeks have been saying bad things about this proposal - but having biked alongside the Metrolink right of way this past week, I think some of their criticism is unfair.</p>
<p>Would this back room compromise ensure that the Gold Line gets extended?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wad</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>Wad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/#comment-1411</guid>
		<description>I wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/02/senator-romero-wont-support-anything-without-guarantees-for-sgv/#comment-1380&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;about this&lt;/a&gt; in an earlier Gloria Romero post.

If there&#039;s any clue that politicians are just punching the clock on transportation, this was the case.

It&#039;s really funny that Metro has to buy high-capacity buses for the Harbor Freeway. To let you in on the punchline: The Harbor Transitway has the usage where you can fit every bus passenger and the driver into a roadster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote <a href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/02/senator-romero-wont-support-anything-without-guarantees-for-sgv/#comment-1380" rel="nofollow">about this</a> in an earlier Gloria Romero post.</p>
<p>If there's any clue that politicians are just punching the clock on transportation, this was the case.</p>
<p>It's really funny that Metro has to buy high-capacity buses for the Harbor Freeway. To let you in on the punchline: The Harbor Transitway has the usage where you can fit every bus passenger and the driver into a roadster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
