<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: San Gabriel Valley Pols Seek Compromise on I-210 Congestion Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Newton</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1418</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/#comment-1418</guid>
		<description>As I understand it, the Gold Line extension is on the &quot;unfunded&quot; list of Metro&#039;s draft LRTP.  If the half cent sales tax proposal is placed on the ballot and passes, it gets funded.  If it doesn&#039;t, then there will be a food fight at the November Metro Board meeting.

That&#039;s why I find the posturing of the SGV folks so confusing.  Just get behind the sales tax proposal and they&#039;ll get what they want.  If they continue to be obstructionist then I doubt the Metro Board is going to move their proposal up the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it, the Gold Line extension is on the &#8220;unfunded&#8221; list of Metro&#8217;s draft LRTP.  If the half cent sales tax proposal is placed on the ballot and passes, it gets funded.  If it doesn&#8217;t, then there will be a food fight at the November Metro Board meeting.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I find the posturing of the SGV folks so confusing.  Just get behind the sales tax proposal and they&#8217;ll get what they want.  If they continue to be obstructionist then I doubt the Metro Board is going to move their proposal up the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wad</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>Wad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>Brayj, the answer is let&#039;s wait and see.

I see compelling arguments for and against getting the Gold Line extended. It can really go either way.

This is an interesting case, because Metro&#039;s bureaucrats have serious misgivings about the Gold Line extension. By the numbers, it is saying that the Gold Line will have a really low boarding density that will bring down the systemwide average. Even the Pasadena route that exists now -- the meat and potatoes of the line -- has badly underperformed.

The big worry is if Metro has to put in an application to the Federal Transit Administration and it comes back stamped with a &quot;not recommended.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brayj, the answer is let&#8217;s wait and see.</p>
<p>I see compelling arguments for and against getting the Gold Line extended. It can really go either way.</p>
<p>This is an interesting case, because Metro&#8217;s bureaucrats have serious misgivings about the Gold Line extension. By the numbers, it is saying that the Gold Line will have a really low boarding density that will bring down the systemwide average. Even the Pasadena route that exists now &#8212; the meat and potatoes of the line &#8212; has badly underperformed.</p>
<p>The big worry is if Metro has to put in an application to the Federal Transit Administration and it comes back stamped with a &#8220;not recommended.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubrayj02</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>ubrayj02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/#comment-1412</guid>
		<description>Wait, I&#039;m confused (really) when will the Gold Line be extended into the San Gabriel Valley into Monrovia? A lot of transit geeks have been saying bad things about this proposal - but having biked alongside the Metrolink right of way this past week, I think some of their criticism is unfair.

Would this back room compromise ensure that the Gold Line gets extended?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, I&#8217;m confused (really) when will the Gold Line be extended into the San Gabriel Valley into Monrovia? A lot of transit geeks have been saying bad things about this proposal &#8211; but having biked alongside the Metrolink right of way this past week, I think some of their criticism is unfair.</p>
<p>Would this back room compromise ensure that the Gold Line gets extended?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wad</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>Wad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/08/san-gabriel-valley-pols-seek-compromise-on-i-210-congestion-plan/#comment-1411</guid>
		<description>I wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/02/senator-romero-wont-support-anything-without-guarantees-for-sgv/#comment-1380&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;about this&lt;/a&gt; in an earlier Gloria Romero post.

If there&#039;s any clue that politicians are just punching the clock on transportation, this was the case.

It&#039;s really funny that Metro has to buy high-capacity buses for the Harbor Freeway. To let you in on the punchline: The Harbor Transitway has the usage where you can fit every bus passenger and the driver into a roadster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote <a href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/07/02/senator-romero-wont-support-anything-without-guarantees-for-sgv/#comment-1380" rel="nofollow">about this</a> in an earlier Gloria Romero post.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s any clue that politicians are just punching the clock on transportation, this was the case.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really funny that Metro has to buy high-capacity buses for the Harbor Freeway. To let you in on the punchline: The Harbor Transitway has the usage where you can fit every bus passenger and the driver into a roadster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

