<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/03/13/todays-headlines-36/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/03/13/todays-headlines-36/</link>
	<description>Covering Los Angeles&#039;s livable streets movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert Green</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/03/13/todays-headlines-36/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/03/13/todays-headlines-36/#comment-408</guid>
		<description>The Times has written one of the stupidest, worst researched, and inane articles I have ever seen. So, the condo market has softened. Some people may lose out. So what? The almost 20,000 people who have moved downtown in the past 5 years won&#039;t move out, the buildings that have been built won&#039;t be torn down or emptied out, the renters who have moved in (who make up the majority of the new residents) won&#039;t be affected by this at all.

It&#039;s speculators who drove these prices up and who will suffer by their fall. The rest of us can get back to the business of building our communities. I say it is a good thing, and will help the development of downtown, not hinder it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Times has written one of the stupidest, worst researched, and inane articles I have ever seen. So, the condo market has softened. Some people may lose out. So what? The almost 20,000 people who have moved downtown in the past 5 years won&#8217;t move out, the buildings that have been built won&#8217;t be torn down or emptied out, the renters who have moved in (who make up the majority of the new residents) won&#8217;t be affected by this at all.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s speculators who drove these prices up and who will suffer by their fall. The rest of us can get back to the business of building our communities. I say it is a good thing, and will help the development of downtown, not hinder it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Mercer</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/03/13/todays-headlines-36/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/03/13/todays-headlines-36/#comment-402</guid>
		<description>The Times sees smoke where there is no fire.

Sure, the downtown housing market is cooling off.  It&#039;s cooling everywhere in the WHOLE COUNTRY, not just southern California.

And if the average price is down 15% for downtown condos rather than 11% elsewhere, that is not a really big yawning gap of a difference.

Buildings are still going up, very few projects have been delayed or abandoned.  The Concerto is going up.  The Medallion is starting to be built.  The Meruelo project is going up.  GLO just opened.  Geoff Palmer is still building his Tuscan fortresses.  EVO is mostly sold and it&#039;s 26 stories.

By the time all of these projects are finished, the economy should be on somewhat of a rebound.  Methinks the Times is too ready to declare the death of Downtown, especially with that headline.  Why do they want to do that?  Isn&#039;t that where their office is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Times sees smoke where there is no fire.</p>
<p>Sure, the downtown housing market is cooling off.  It&#8217;s cooling everywhere in the WHOLE COUNTRY, not just southern California.</p>
<p>And if the average price is down 15% for downtown condos rather than 11% elsewhere, that is not a really big yawning gap of a difference.</p>
<p>Buildings are still going up, very few projects have been delayed or abandoned.  The Concerto is going up.  The Medallion is starting to be built.  The Meruelo project is going up.  GLO just opened.  Geoff Palmer is still building his Tuscan fortresses.  EVO is mostly sold and it&#8217;s 26 stories.</p>
<p>By the time all of these projects are finished, the economy should be on somewhat of a rebound.  Methinks the Times is too ready to declare the death of Downtown, especially with that headline.  Why do they want to do that?  Isn&#8217;t that where their office is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubrayj02</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/03/13/todays-headlines-36/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>ubrayj02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/03/13/todays-headlines-36/#comment-400</guid>
		<description>The budget cuts in L.A. make for an interesting opportunity.

I&#039;ve heard talk that Council staff might be losing their free cars (or the number of free cars they get).

I&#039;ve heard that they might start getting free bikes!

Also, now might be a good time to suggest turning the LADOT into a transit-only (along with taxicab licensing) agency, and pull all of its infrastructure staff into the Department of Public Works.

The roadway planning staff could be shoved into Planning - where they could use the help.

The meter maids could got to the LAPD or general services.

Getting rid of a department, and consolidating fleets and maintenance staff could be a huge savings. It would certainly make political decisions having to do with the roadway easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The budget cuts in L.A. make for an interesting opportunity.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard talk that Council staff might be losing their free cars (or the number of free cars they get).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that they might start getting free bikes!</p>
<p>Also, now might be a good time to suggest turning the LADOT into a transit-only (along with taxicab licensing) agency, and pull all of its infrastructure staff into the Department of Public Works.</p>
<p>The roadway planning staff could be shoved into Planning &#8211; where they could use the help.</p>
<p>The meter maids could got to the LAPD or general services.</p>
<p>Getting rid of a department, and consolidating fleets and maintenance staff could be a huge savings. It would certainly make political decisions having to do with the roadway easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david p.</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/03/13/todays-headlines-36/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>david p.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/03/13/todays-headlines-36/#comment-394</guid>
		<description>we gotta get kobe on the red line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we gotta get kobe on the red line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Newton</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/03/13/todays-headlines-36/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/03/13/todays-headlines-36/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just jealous of the NY&#039;ers getting to write about some Rangers and Knicks players taking transit to their games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just jealous of the NY&#8217;ers getting to write about some Rangers and Knicks players taking transit to their games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david p.</title>
		<link>http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/03/13/todays-headlines-36/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>david p.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.streetsblog.org/2008/03/13/todays-headlines-36/#comment-389</guid>
		<description>that was a stretch on that usc article damien... ;)

but, good for him.  $100 says it&#039;s a beach cruiser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that was a stretch on that usc article damien&#8230; ;)</p>
<p>but, good for him.  $100 says it&#8217;s a beach cruiser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

