Alarcón to Metro: I Don’t Trust You Guys

Public comment for Metro’s planned service cuts ended nearly two weeks ago, but that didn’t stop the City Council from taking its turn yesterday questioning the cuts. The results weren’t pretty.

During a pointed discussion of the impact cutting bus routes would have on ridership on Metro’s rapid lines, Councilmember (and former Metro Board Member) Richard Alarcón bluntly told Metro staff that he didn’t believe their numbers. Looking Metro Staffer Carolyn Flowers straight in the eyes, the Councilmember said, "I don’t trust you guys" when told that Metro’s planned changes will actually result in a 1 percent increase in seat capacity. Both the Bus Rider’s Union (370,000 hours) and the Transit Coalition (more than 200,000 hours) have estimated that the "service changes" will result in a massive loss of service hours for buses.

Alarcón has been a leading critic of Metro throughout his career. Recently he questioned their role in ending the free transfer between Metro and DASH services and has long maintained that Metro has shifted resources away from the San Fernando Valley. As an Senator, Alarcón earmarked funds for a San Fernando Valley Rapid Line nearly a decade ago.

Councilmember Tom LaBonge also skewered Metro’s cuts noting that many changes would reduce service on the "School Tripper" program. He was particularly agitated about changes to line 175 which "carries 700 students" to school every day.

Flowers blamed federal funding policies for the proposed cuts. She claimed that having trips just for school students violates a federal mandate that public transit provide a benefit for all riders. Metro is working with LAUSD to continue this program.

Councilmember Bill Rosendahl summed up the feelings of most of the audience as the Q and A was wrapping up by arguing that now was a terrible time to be cutting bus service. "We should be spending a lot more on buses. The Subway to the Sea is great; but only buses can be done quickly when a need arises."

  • You’ve got to wonder where the billions spent by the MTA each year go. Since I have not studied the issue too deeply, I am often left scratching my head. They already get one whole cent of sales tax in L.A. County – which equals billions of dollars every year.

    The prime directive in their bi-annual Call For Projects is “move cars”, so perhaps these service cuts are not much of a surprise. Building and maintaining car infrastructure is expensive.

    The MTA measures a bus holding 90 people and a single occupant car as equals (i.e. both are equal to “one vehicle” in their traffic measures). This reduction in service is likely predicted to “relieve congestion” because it is taking a “vehicle” off the road.

  • Damien Newton

    Thanks to the Councilmember’s staff for catching that he was indeed a Senator when earmarking funds for a San Fernando Rapid Bus line.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

LADOT Questions Metro’s Bus Cuts

|
Last month, the Metro Board passed a resolution requiring staff to prepare a memo outlining total service cuts from 2007 and expected cuts for 2008 and 2009. Board Members wanted to put the proposed bus service changes for this June into a larger context to better understand the impact on local economies and Metro’s ridership. […]

Metro in 2010: More Rail, BRT and Highways. Less Bus Service

|
Photo: Marco Siguenza/Flickr Even with Measure R, not even Metro is immune to bus service cuts. At 2:30 this afternoon, Metro will hold its public hearing on the staff-proposed 2010 budget.  The budget will also be heard at next week’s Full Board Meeting before being voted on.  The budget doesn’t contain a lot of surprises, […]

A Peek Into Metro’s Frequent Bus Network Proposal

|
Metro is currently considering some pretty big bus service changes. Basically Metro is considering a cost-neutral scheme that would eliminate multiple relatively low-performing bus lines and would add more frequent service on a core network. More details below. Overall it looks like a step in a positive direction, though the devil may be in the details. And […]

What Factors Are Causing Metro’s Declining Ridership? What Next?

|
In my circles, there has been a lot of discussion swirling around Wednesday’s Los Angeles Times article, Billions spent, but fewer people are using public transportation in Southern California, by Laura Nelson and Dan Weikel. The Times’ authors cast a disparaging light on recent downturns in ridership: “Despite a $9-billion investment in new light rail […]