San Fernando Valley Service Cuts Hearing Report

Francisca Sanchez didn’t testify but made her opinion known.

More than 60 people showed up to ask Metro to cancel or modify some of their proposed service cuts in San Fernando Valley earlier this evening (Wednesday). What wasn’t surprising was that so many members of the public came out on a Christian religious holiday, but that the members of the Service Sector Board (more on that tomorrow) seemed as aghast at the proposed cuts as the general public was.

Service cuts hearings are a rare time when the transit activist groups can all agree. A representative from the BRU wondered what happened to the promise that last year’s fare increase while the Transit Coalition raged that proposed cuts are "destroying the bus network." A representative for SO.CA.TA also spoke against some of the cuts, but I he was speaking so fast (to try and get his comments within the limit) and was speaking on so many different lines that I had trouble following him.

It wasn’t just the usual suspects blasting Metro’s plans. Advocates for the disabled, the elderly, college students at L.A. Mission College (who would lose the only transit line to their campus) and a representative for Assemblyman Felipe Fuentes all testified against parts or all of the planned cuts. There was even a cameo appearance from a representative for LADOT who called the proposal "premature" and noted the plan would "inconvenience a lot of people."

There were plenty of members of the riding public who weren’t there to move an agenda, but to plead for the lines that connect them from where they live to where they work, shop, worship, eat and play.

Sean Ewell Murphy, speaking on behalf of his wife, noted that cutting Line 224 would lead to his wife having to walk over a mile just to reach the bus stop and warned the board that "you would disenfranchise her from riding the bus." Bus rider Chuck Erickson noted that he rode line 154 to the hearing and "It didn’t seem empty to me." The 154 is one of the routes that may be eliminated.

Some of the commentors noted that previous cuts had left service so poor on lines that it isn’t a surprise that people are abandoning the lines. Others noted that some of the routes due to be cut are heading toward major trip generators in the future. For example, NBC Studios is moving many of its operations to Universal Studios who’s line from San Fernando is being cut.

The most popular lines that are facing the ax are the 154 and 155 out of Burbank Station, 168 (connecting San Fernando to Chatsworth) and the 634 (which is the aforementioned connection to L.A. Mission College.) While each line will be fought for individually by those that ride it, more than one person testifying that they could think of a way for Metro to trim a lot of the $100 million needed to close its operating deficit.

  • Kymberleigh Richards

    Of course, what most people who believe service could be preserved if construction projects were halted don’t know (because the BRU has done such a great job at blurring reality) is that money used for capital projects, such as rail construction, are a separate “pot” of money than that used to operate service.

    And capital funds cannot be used to operate service. There are legal restrictions on both the state and federal level which prevents the Metro Board of Directors from doing so.

    While I agree that the rail gating proposal is a bad idea, the money that would be used to install those gates would be capital funds. (The fact that there would be an annual operating cost, which would come from funds that could run bus service, is a different matter that doesn’t enter into the present discussion on bus service reductions.)

    So calling for a halt to capital projects as a “solution” to the service cuts is not going to find an audience at the Metro Board, because they already know it isn’t legally an option. In fact, every time the BRU insists that, they lose a little more credibility before the Board.

  • Pingback: What’s Next and What do the Results Mean?:City Council Edition | Streetsblog Los Angeles()

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Metro Proposes More Cuts to Bus System

|
Earlier this week, Metro announced another set of proposed cuts to its bus system.  Following so soon on the cuts from just last month, Metro CEO Art Leahy took to The Source to defend the changes.  Oddly, rather than defend the good work being done by the bus division at Metro and push for the […]

Less People, Same Passion at Westside/Central Sector

|
Planned Westside and Central Sector Changes Last night the Westside/Central Sector Council for the Metro Board held their public hearing on Metro’s planned service cuts. The meeting wasn’t as well attended as the one I attended last week in the San Fernando Valley, but nearly everyone that attended the meeting testified and the outcry was […]

Feedback from DASH Hearings: Cuts Bad, Hikes Reasonable

|
Photo: Fred Camino/Flickr Tonight is the last of the five hearings on the major service changes that have been proposed for LADOT’s transit services, DASH, Commuter Express, City Ride and Charter Bus Service.  The first four hearings have seen crowds of various sizes, with packed house’s at the hearings in the San Fernando Valley’s hearing […]

Metro Proposes More Changes to Bus Routes and Schedules

|
One year ago, during Metro’s bi-annual revision of its bus schedule, Metro released a schedule of proposed cuts, that was universally panned by pretty much every transit advocate in town, from Bart Reed, to Kymberleigh Richards to Damien Goodmon to the Bus Rider’s Union.  After a nearly universal bad reception, Mayor and Board-Chair-In-Waiting cut a […]

Sector Board Also Against Service Cuts

|
Residents Get on the Bus in the Valley Just before last night’s hearing was gaveled to a close, Board Member Kymberleigh Richards stopped the chairman before the meeting was ended. It was a good thing she did, because each board member took a turn discussing their views on the service cuts (all were negative in […]