Metro Considers Raising "Senior Discount" Age to 65

At yesterday’s meeting of Metro’s Finance and Budget Subcommittee staff raised the specter of changing the age needed to receive the "Senior Discount" from 62 to 65. All residents currently receiving the discount would be grandfathered in. In response to a question from the audience, Board Member John Fasana clarified that such a change would not constitute a fare increase and would not require a public outreach process.

Long-time transit advocate John Walsh disagreed, "If you think you’ve had protesters at meetings before, you’ll have 5,000 angry people if you go ahead and do this…and we’ll see you in court!" (Incidently, every Metro meeting I go to has at least one angry member of the public shout "I/we’ll see you in court!")

One reason Metro is considering changing the discount is the aid requirements created by the state and federal government. As explained by a Foothill Transit staffer during their fare increase, changing local and base fares reduces the amount of state aid you (an agency) can receive.

While there may not be a formal process to review such a plan, there are two ways to voice your opinion: Metro’s monthly board meeting is next Thursday at their headquarters and the next online chat with the Board chair is scheduled for noon, next Wednesday.
  • radical transportation engineer

    Wow, that’s unbelievable. Good to see Metro feeding on the elderly yet again. Didn’t they just take away some of their discounts also? What are they going to do when the baby boomers turn 65, raise it to 80? Way to go Metro, you guys rule!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Metro Board Changes Course on Senior Fares

|
Last week, Street Heat was the only media source of any kind to cover that Metro was considering raising the age necessary to receive a "senior discount" to 65. This week, Metro’s board reversed course completely, not only rejecting the plan to raise the age to receive a discount on cash fares during rush hour, […]

APTA Metro Review: Raise Fares, Consolidate Service, Charge For Parking

|
When the Metro board approved fare hikes last May, it also directed Metro to engage experts from the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) to study Metro’s fares and look into other revenue strategies. APTA experts completed their review recently, and presented their findings at last week’s Metro board meeting. Though the APTA review recommended approving Metro’s proposed […]

Opposition and Confrontation at Metro Fare Increase Hearing

|
On Saturday, Metro held a public hearing on proposed changes to its fare policy. Metro is proposing to raise its $1.50 base transit fare to $1.75 starting September 2014. From there, it would be raised again to $2.00 in 2017, and to $2.25 in 2020. This would include a 90-minute free transfer, but only when the […]

This Time, It Really Would Be a Restructuring

|
One of the more maddening parts of covering and discussing the mass transit system in Los Angeles is a fare structure that, quite honestly, doesn’t make a lot of sense. Fares vary wildly depending on whether one is riding Metro or a local system. Transfers are rare among agencies, and difficult for new riders to […]

Once-ler of the Week

|
Congratulations to Governor Schwarzenegger for being the first winner of the Once-ler of the week award. So far he’s managed to avoid any blame for Foothill Transit’s fare hike, but the root cause of the hike and the structure of the hike can be traced directly to state policy. At the end of the speaker’s […]

Thoughts on Metro’s Fare Restructuring

|
(I want to be explicit this is solely my own opinion, and in no way endorsed by either Streetsblog or Southern California Transit Advocates – DG But I can’t help notice that So.CA.TA. has a special meeting just to discuss the changes this Saturday. – DN) Metro staff recently released two options for fare restructuring […]