Westsiders Get Riled at Pico/Olympic Meeting

Everyone Opposed, Raise Your Hand…You in the Back, We’re Ony Counting That Once!

It seems that every time I go to a meeting focused on the Pico/Olympic Boulevard controversy the meeting gets a) more crowded and b) more confrontational. Last night, literally hundreds of residents and business owners packed a forum held by the Westside Neighborhood Council to hear about LADOT’s plan and loudly voice their objection. The plan would increase capacity on Pico and Olympic Boulevards by re-timing traffic signals, limiting left-hand turns and imposing restrictions on peak hour parking.

The format of the event was designed to limit direct interaction between LADOT and the audience to prevent an angry back-and-forth from dominating the meeting. Questions were written on cards and read by a moderator.

The crowd’s anger wasn’t just directed at DOT. The crowd jeered one of the plan’s chief proponents, and their local Councilman. Jack Weiss. Weiss was again conspicuous by his absence. The councilman’s representative did not speak to the crowd or attempt to answer any questions directed towards elected officials.

Also up for a verbal berating was Westside Neighborhood Council Chair and event moderator Terri Tippit, an opponent of the plan, who was under constant pressure to either read more questions, read less questions, explain what the question meant, or "shut up and let him (DOT representative John Fisher) answer the question.

I mention the crowd’s passion not as an condemnation of the event, which was as well moderated as could be expected, or the attendees; but to illustrate how heated this issue is for the people along the corridor.

If most of the emotion at last week’s meeting was over the issue of lost parking and its impact to the community, this meeting was dominated by fears of cut through traffic racing through local side streets. Fisher, repeatedly claimed that the plan was designed to reduce cut through traffic by increasing capacity on Pico/Olympic during rush hour so there would be no need to cut east/west through the community. Also, by limiting the left hand turns on intersections with smaller roads, north/south traffic will stay on larger roads such as Beverly Glen Blvd.

(ed: note: An original version of this article said "Motor Ave" instead of Beverly Glen Blvd. Motor Avenue will actually be seeing a decrease in cut through traffic because of signalization limiting left hand turns.)

The crowd was unimpressed, repeatedly questioning the proposal and wondering how bringing more traffic to the area (greater capacity=more traffic) will somehow help their current issues. Several times there were questions asking why traffic calming wasn’t used to keep cars off the local streets instead of this more complicated plan. The answer: traffic calming can help, but this plan will help more.

Business owners were similarly unimpressed with claims that the parking restrictions wouldn’t effect them in the long-term. Fisher pointed to dry cleaners along Pico Boulevard that currently thrive even with peak hour restrictions on parking. Locals noted that those cleaners have adequate off street parking, and that in a neighborhood that is mostly Jewish it’s pretty insulting to imply that they should pick up their laundry on weekends (when they can’t drive).

DOT couldn’t promise that the community would have a chance to do a full review of the plan before the City Council voted on it, after all the Council doesn’t report to LADOT; but did promise that they were not yet done their community outreach or tweaking the plan to meet the community’s approval. If "community approval" is the goal, they have a long way to go.

(editor’s note: The above picture is of a "straw poll" that was done at the end of the meeting. For the majority of the event, there were no empty seats and the standing room extended into the lobby.)

  • Anonymous

    Though the vast majority of your reporting on last night’s meeting was accurate from my perspective, you made one very glaring error. John Fisher said more than once, in response to questions re: N/S traffic and neighorhood cut through, that DOT would be ramping DOWN the metering on Motor Avenue (much to the dismay of many adjacent community members who would prefer that Motor become the solution to the excess commuter traffic on the Westside). You reported “by limiting the left hand turns on intersections with smaller roads, north/south traffic will stay on larger roads such as Motor Ave.” That is not at all what Mr. Fisher said. On the contrary, he reiterated on several occasions that DOT would be protecting Patricia, Prosser, Manning and Motor with left-turn light timing that would limit cut-through traffic on those RESIDENTIAL streets. Furthermore, he went into great detail to explain that residential streets will not be the recipients of spillover traffic from the Pico/Olympic proposal though the vast majority in the audience believe that is exactly what will result.

    It’s important to be accurate when you are reporting on a significant proposal, one that will impact thousands of businesses and residents.

  • DAYMEN

    A quick review of my notes shows you to be 100% correct. I’ve made a change above and apologize.

  • Anonymous

    Happy to see the corrected version! Given your excellent comprehensive reporting, my first thought was that you’d made an error. Thanks for making the change.

  • DAYMEN

    Yeah, it was an especially annoying error because I had a whole paragraph on Beverly Glen and took it out…

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Judge Slams, Stalls Pico-Olympic Plan

|
Maybe it’s not such a "done-deal" after all. Mayor Villaraigosa and Councilman Jack Weiss, the two elected proponents of speeding up traffic on Pico and Olympic Boulevards at the expense of local businesses and non-motorized travel, were dealt a setback yesterday when a Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge ruled that the city needs to […]

Community Slams Mayor, Weiss on Pico/Olympic Plan

|
"The medium is the message" is a well known saying among Public Relations theorists. In the story we’re about to discuss, the medium used to send the message was the traditional media. By choosing that medium, the unintended message that the community received was "up yours." When Mayor Villaraigosa and Councilman Jack Weiss held a […]

City/Locals Clash on Pico-Olympic Plan

|
Could there be a better illustration of the divide between the DOT and the community? As I sat and watched angry/scared locals from along the Pico-Olympic corridors testify against the Mayor’s Pico-Olympic plan, I suddenly felt bad for LADOT Transportation Engineer Ken Husting. Basically, it shouldn’t have been this way. The residents and business owners […]