http://la.streetsblog.org/2007/11/30/latino-urban-forum-backs-goldline-extension-connecting-parks/ Covering Los Angeles's livable streets movement Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://la.streetsblog.org/2007/11/30/latino-urban-forum-backs-goldline-extension-connecting-parks/comment-page-1/#comment-214181 erardigma Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:59:33 +0000 http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=104#comment-214181 Ого Ого

]]> http://la.streetsblog.org/2007/11/30/latino-urban-forum-backs-goldline-extension-connecting-parks/comment-page-1/#comment-44 TransitBoy Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:58:00 +0000 http://la.streetsblog.org/?p=104#comment-44 So we're supposed to support a rail path because on summer weekends some people might take it to go to a park? <br/><br/>Where along 60 are we going to put a TOD? When I drive along 60 to the east of Atlantic I recall it going through uninhabited hills.<br/><br/>Clearly a southern route is the preferred route for the Gold Line extension, as there are many transit dependent people in Montebello and Whittier who will welcome such a project. In addition, a southerly route could theoretically connect with Metrolink at the Norwalk station, greatly increasing LA/OC transit mobility. So we’re supposed to support a rail path because on summer weekends some people might take it to go to a park?

Where along 60 are we going to put a TOD? When I drive along 60 to the east of Atlantic I recall it going through uninhabited hills.

Clearly a southern route is the preferred route for the Gold Line extension, as there are many transit dependent people in Montebello and Whittier who will welcome such a project. In addition, a southerly route could theoretically connect with Metrolink at the Norwalk station, greatly increasing LA/OC transit mobility.

]]>